| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Made with
```shell
git restore .
fd '\.nix$' pkgs/ --type f -j1 -x bash -xc "$(cat <<"EOF"
typos --no-check-filenames --write-changes "$1"
git diff --exit-code "$1" && exit
#( git diff "$1" | grep -qE "^\+ +[^# ]") && git restore "$1"
count1="$( bat --language nix --diff --style changes "$1" --theme "Monokai Extended" --color always | aha --no-header | grep -E '^<span style="color:olive;">~</span> ' | wc -l )"
count2="$( bat --language nix --diff --style changes "$1" --theme "Monokai Extended" --color always | aha --no-header | grep -E '^<span style="color:olive;">~</span> (<span style="color:#f8f8f2;"> *</span>)?<span style="color:#75715e;">.*</span>$' | wc -l )"
[[ $count1 -ne $count2 ]] && git restore "$1"
EOF
)" -- {}
```
and filtered with `GIT_DIFF_OPTS='--unified=15' git -c interactive.singleKey=true add --patch`
I initially tried using the tree-sitter cli, python bindings and even ast-grep through various means, but this is what I ended up with.
|
|
After final improvements to the official formatter implementation,
this commit now performs the first treewide reformat of Nix files using it.
This is part of the implementation of RFC 166.
Only "inactive" files are reformatted, meaning only files that
aren't being touched by any PR with activity in the past 2 months.
This is to avoid conflicts for PRs that might soon be merged.
Later we can do a full treewide reformat to get the rest,
which should not cause as many conflicts.
A CI check has already been running for some time to ensure that new and
already-formatted files are formatted, so the files being reformatted here
should also stay formatted.
This commit was automatically created and can be verified using
nix-build https://github.com/infinisil/treewide-nixpkgs-reformat-script/archive/a08b3a4d199c6124ac5b36a889d9099b4383463f.tar.gz \
--argstr baseRev 78e9caf153f5a339bf1d4c000ff6f0a503a369c8
result/bin/apply-formatting $NIXPKGS_PATH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, `pkgs.ruby` is ruby 2.7.6, which is in 'security updates
only' mode and scheduled to go EOL April 2023. Updating `pkgs.ruby`
to be ruby 3.1 would be a rather large change, but using ruby 3 to
bootstrap building ruby itself would be a nice first step in that
direction.
Tested with asciidoctor that this indeed now allows building a ruby
application without getting ruby 2.7 in the build closure.
Also fixes #192729
|
|
|
|
|
|
fixes cross 'error: attribute 'runtimeShell' missing'
|
|
Lay the groundwork for switching to binary wrappers by reducing uses
of `--run` (which is not supported by `makeBinaryWrapper`).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the gemdir was referenced on the derivation, it would cause the
whole gemdir to get added to the store, which would in turn force the
derivation to be rebuilt whenever unrelated folder files would change.
|
|
_3llo: init at 0.3.0
|
|
The `gemset` field can be an attribute set as well in `buildRubyGem`,
however attribute sets can't be coerced to strings for the environment
set.
The impact should be relatively small as the environment variables are
only used by the `runCommand` script for `bunlderApp` which doesn't
refer to `gemset` at all.
|
|
|
|
The manual documents both bundlerEnv and bundlerApp as providing `env`
and `wrappedRuby` attributes on the resulting derivations. However only
bundlerEnv actually had these attributes. Update bundlerApp to provide
the same passthru that bundlerEnv does.
|
|
|
|
Like `bundlerEnv`, the `gemdir` parameter to `bundlerApp` can be omitted
if all 3 of `gemfile`, `lockfile`, and `gemset` are provided.
|
|
|
|
It would be reasonable to have a Ruby program that depends on some other
program being in the PATH. In this case, the obvious thing to do would
be something like this:
bundlerApp {
# ...
buildInputs = [ makeWrapper ];
postBuild = ''
wrapProgram "$out/bin/foo" \
--prefix PATH : ${lib.makeBinPath [ dep ]}
'';
}
However, this doesn't work, because even though it just forwards most of
its arguments to `runCommand`, `bundlerApp` won't take a `buildInputs`
parameter. It doesn't even specify its own `buildInputs`, which means
that the `scripts` parameter to `bundlerApp` (which depends on
`makeWrapper`) is completely broken, and, as far as I can tell, has been
since its inception. I've added a `makeWrapper` build input if the
scripts parameter is present to fix this.
I've added a `buildInputs` option to `bundlerApp`. It's also passed
through to bundled-common because `postBuild` scripts are run there as
well. This actually means that in this example we'd end up going through
two layers of wrappers (one from `bundlerApp` and one from
bundled-common), but that has always been the case and isn't likely to
break anything. That oddity does suggest that it might be prudent to
not forward `postBuild` to bundled-common (or to at least use a
different option) though...
FWIW, as far as I can tell no package in nixpkgs uses either the
`scripts` or `postBuild` options to `bundlerApp`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|