diff options
| author | Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> | 2025-08-17 22:24:24 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> | 2025-08-20 15:38:35 +0200 |
| commit | ddf81dead677725c7aea949d7c2abff619018f44 (patch) | |
| tree | f0fbfbfa30761be6b2df15dd22dee25c69276240 /pkgs/development/python-modules/python-sql | |
| parent | 7f4dd7e2ff0e4be10a549db6241b7fb253ff7b04 (diff) | |
workflows/reviewers: integrate codeowner reviews
These two jobs mostly used the same code anyway, so they can easily run
in the same job. This uses fewer resources and avoids running (and
failing) the codeowners review job on Pull Requests from development
branches like staging-next or haskell-updates.
It also opens the door for more improvements later on, for example it
will be much easier to implement a shared reviewer limit for both owners
and maintainers now.
Diffstat (limited to 'pkgs/development/python-modules/python-sql')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions