summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pkgs/development/python-modules/python-mapnik/python-mapnik_std_optional.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKonstantin Nazarov <mail@knazarov.com>2025-01-13 22:32:32 +0000
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2025-01-13 23:32:32 +0100
commit3c547e6031725e4446e7752d5b0ab27efd3db4ef (patch)
tree1d829d569fc344c0854684e999d5288f11c0de06 /pkgs/development/python-modules/python-mapnik/python-mapnik_std_optional.patch
parentf61d498f8c9a9f70f169b2812d52827480485803 (diff)
newlib: add installation of libgloss for embedded targets (#367275)
I was trying to get an embedded RISC-V toolchain working, by following pretty much a documented workflow: ``` pkgsCross = import pkgs.path { localSystem = pkgs.stdenv.buildPlatform.system; crossSystem = { config = "riscv32-none-elf"; libc = "newlib-nano"; gcc.arch = "rv32im"; }; }; ``` This is supposed to work for compiling programs that target "bare-metal". But when I tried to compile my project, GCC complained that it can't fild `-lgloss`. If you're curious what libgloss is, in very simple terms it's a glue layer that allows you to provide implementation for the bare minimum functionality that would get the rest of the libc working. (such as `_sbrk`, `_open`, `_read` and friends). After digging into it for a while, I've figured out that newlib which is shipped by nixpkgs doesn't contain libgloss as part of the build resuts. So this isn't just me misconfiguring the search paths. You may be wondering - why didn't anyone else find this issue? My current guess is that nobody really uses this combination (newlib-nano plus a bare-metal deployment). Most people who use the cross toolchains likely target an operating system which provides syscalls already and don't implement the stubs themselves. If you really want to try and reproduce the bug, you need to pass this as a flag to gcc: `--specs=nano.specs`. Also, this bug is not really specific to NixOS, but happened in ArchLinux as well. Here's a relevant bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/66548. This is where I've found the fix. Adding the fix in the way I did seems to fix the problem for good. The fix itself doesn't seem to be dangerous because in case libgloss is absent, it would be skipped and not copied to the build results. NB: during review it's been also suggested to add libm for the same reasons, so this is what I did as well.
Diffstat (limited to 'pkgs/development/python-modules/python-mapnik/python-mapnik_std_optional.patch')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions