diff options
| author | Léo Gaspard <leo@gaspard.io> | 2021-05-21 03:06:21 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2021-05-21 03:06:21 +0200 |
| commit | 211fee9c4379714d861b3c875f642addbd25e920 (patch) | |
| tree | 3d525ba7eaa63a4d11687358a445e3ebe8ebd8f7 /pkgs/development/python-modules/python-mapnik/python-mapnik_std_optional.patch | |
| parent | 6bad8a5633d6c485c37b169905048b6cd365a67b (diff) | |
pull request template: cleanup (#117537)
Remove elements of the PR template that have a low signal/noise ratio,
and add one that I think would have a good signal/noise ratio.
-----
Remove:
Determined the impact on package closure size (by running `nix path-info
-S` before and after)
-----
Rationale:
This is rarely done in practice, and apart from for specific packages
this is usually not a good indicator of anything useful
It might make sense to re-introduce it with two holes to fill, but then
we would have to make a serious decision to never land without these two
numbers filled in or with too big a regression, because in practice this
box has been a no-op in many cases.
Maybe just integrating this check in nixpkgs-review would bring the most
benefit here?
-----
-----
Remove:
Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
-----
Rationale:
This is fuzzy, “relevant documentation” is way too often hard to find
-----
-----
Add:
Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
-----
Rationale:
This is way too often forgotten, and is also a self-contained easy task
-----
Diffstat (limited to 'pkgs/development/python-modules/python-mapnik/python-mapnik_std_optional.patch')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
