diff options
| author | Jiahui Zhang <jiahuitry@outlook.com> | 2026-07-21 06:56:05 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2026-08-06 18:57:22 -0700 |
| commit | 613c2d5552d2f5f631a6738e01eb95f660854590 (patch) | |
| tree | 941301f487b169c9f06181688cf742d0ddb4d6bf /tools | |
| parent | 51fa46c364039d5f44737f24e2bf22ca5e143d0f (diff) | |
mm/damon/ops-common: prevent migration fallback to non-target nodes
DAMOS_MIGRATE_{HOT,COLD} passes a target NUMA node to migrate_pages().
But alloc_migration_target() only treats mtc->nid as a preferred node
unless __GFP_THISNODE is set. Hence target allocation can fall back to
another node, and migrate_pages() can report success without placing the
folio on the requested target node.
Consider a two-node tiered system where node 0 is a fast tier and node 1
is a CPU-less slow tier such as CXL memory, and the user wants to promote
hot regions from node 1 to node 0 with a command like:
sudo damo start --ops vaddr --target_pid ${workload_pid} \
--damos_action migrate_hot 0 \
--damos_access_rate 70% max
Without the __GFP_THISNODE flag, when the memory allocator finds that node
0 is nearly full, it can fall back to node 1 without waking up kswapd.
Then the pages allocated for migrate_pages() are still on node 1, and the
regions that are expected to be promoted to node 0 are only moved to
different physical pages on node 1.
Meanwhile, both the mm_migrate_pages tracepoint and DAMOS's own sz_applied
statistics (reported via the damos_stat_after_apply_interval tracepoint)
show the migrations as successful, which makes the failure practically
invisible and hard to investigate.
Running a demotion-purpose DAMOS scheme alongside the promotion scheme
does not fully avoid this either. If demotion cannot keep up with the
promotion rate, allocation can still fall back to node 1 during promotion,
and the same misleading statistics show up.
Make DAMON's migration target allocation strict by setting __GFP_THISNODE,
so that a failed allocation on the target node is reported as a failure
instead of silently landing on a different node. This is consistent with
alloc_misplaced_dst_folio(), alloc_demote_folio(), and with
do_move_pages_to_node(), which all use __GFP_THISNODE for migrations to an
explicit destination node.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260721135607.251869-1-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiahui Zhang <jiahuitry@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
