diff options
| author | Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> | 2026-07-03 06:57:01 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> | 2026-07-07 15:10:48 -0400 |
| commit | ef2d3e4635761b0af2bf1b89a2252e42a3bf37f1 (patch) | |
| tree | e526da2228194f9ad39fcce8befb5ab3bb85574f /tools/perf/scripts/python | |
| parent | 149b192e376d746bf7b8e1e02541c2256c3b17f0 (diff) | |
rust: task: clarify comments on task UID accessors
Linux has separate subjective and objective task credentials, see the
comment above `struct cred`. Clarify which accessor functions operate on
which set of credentials.
Also document that Task::euid() is a very weird operation. You can see how
weird it is by grepping for task_euid() in the history - binder was its
only user. Task::euid() obtains the objective effective UID - it looks
at the credentials of the task for purposes of acting on it as an
object, but then accesses the effective UID (which the credentials.7 man
page describes as "[...] used by the kernel to determine the permissions
that the process will have when accessing shared resources [...]").
For context:
Arguably, binder's use of task_euid() is a theoretical security problem,
which only has no impact on Android because Android has no setuid binaries
executable by apps.
commit 29bc22ac5e5b ("binder: use euid from cred instead of using task")
originally fixed that by removing that only user of task_euid(), but the
fix got reverted in commit c21a80ca0684 ("binder: fix test regression
due to sender_euid change") because some Android test started failing.
It was since fixed again by commit 65b672152289 ("binder: use
current_euid() for transaction sender identity"), which uses
current_euid() instead.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
