btrfs: stop checking for -EEXIST return value from btrfs_uuid_tree_add()

We never return -EEXIST from btrfs_uuid_tree_add(), if the item already
exists we extend it, so it's pointless to check for such return value.

Furthermore, in create_pending_snapshot(), the logic is completely broken.
The goal was to not error out and abort the transaction in case of -EEXIST
but we left 'ret' with the -EEXIST value, so we end up setting
pending->error to -EEXIST and return that error up the call chain up to
btrfs_commit_transaction(), which will abort the transaction.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions