unwind_user/fp: Use dummies instead of ifdef

This simplifies the code.   unwind_user_next_fp() does not need to
return -EINVAL if config option HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP is disabled, as
unwind_user_start() will then not select this unwind method and
unwind_user_next() will therefore not call it.

Provide (1) a dummy definition of ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME, if the unwind
user method HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP is not enabled, (2) a common fallback
definition of unwind_user_at_function_start() which returns false, and
(3) a common dummy definition of ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_ENTRY_FRAME.

Note that enabling the config option HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP without
defining ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME triggers a compile error, which is
helpful when implementing support for this unwind user method in an
architecture.  Enabling the config option when providing an arch-
specific unwind_user_at_function_start() definition makes it necessary
to also provide an arch-specific ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_ENTRY_FRAME
definition.

Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251208160352.1363040-3-jremus@linux.ibm.com

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions