summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/lib/python
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>2026-08-31 20:30:42 +0000
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2026-09-02 18:19:19 -0700
commitaf602c7aa5fedc9be3043244017aef4f26c96b70 (patch)
tree1765282fb7828988c3d2e18fc8a4e040fee2a496 /tools/lib/python
parent544d85de4dc22c01badfd8cefa59829ce35c4858 (diff)
bonding: do not clear curr_active_slave prematurely when releasing all slaves
When releasing all slaves during bond destruction (all == true), __bond_release_one() unconditionally clears bond->curr_active_slave to NULL in every iteration. If a backup slave is released before the active slave, bond_alb_deinit_slave() triggers rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(), which increments the active slave dev promiscuity counter and sets bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 1. Because bond->curr_active_slave was prematurely cleared to NULL when releasing the backup slave, the subsequent iteration releasing the active slave evaluates oldcurrent as NULL, so bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL) is skipped. Consequently, bond_alb_handle_active_change() is never called to decrement the promiscuity counter, permanently leaking promiscuous mode on the physical device after bond teardown. When oldcurrent == slave, bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL) already sets bond->curr_active_slave to NULL. We only need to avoid selecting a new active slave when all == true. Replace the if (all) branch with if (!all && oldcurrent == slave). Fixes: 0896341a44bf ("bonding: fix bond_release_all inconsistencies") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260831203042.164466-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions