summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2026-01-18 15:15:47 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2026-01-18 15:15:47 -0800
commit90a855e75a99f2932b19f4d04bac1edef158d95e (patch)
tree9fd9eb284ead043a935c69466f11890e9a73412b /security
parent6f32aa91612ae7e6a59f7ed228ce6274231a9332 (diff)
parent6abbb8703aeeb645a681ab6ad155e0b450413787 (diff)
Merge tag 'landlock-6.19-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux
Pull landlock fixes from Mickaël Salaün: "This fixes TCP handling, tests, documentation, non-audit elided code, and minor cosmetic changes" * tag 'landlock-6.19-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux: landlock: Clarify documentation for the IOCTL access right selftests/landlock: Properly close a file descriptor landlock: Improve the comment for domain_is_scoped selftests/landlock: Use scoped_base_variants.h for ptrace_test selftests/landlock: Fix missing semicolon selftests/landlock: Fix typo in fs_test landlock: Optimize stack usage when !CONFIG_AUDIT landlock: Fix spelling landlock: Clean up hook_ptrace_access_check() landlock: Improve erratum documentation landlock: Remove useless include landlock: Fix wrong type usage selftests/landlock: NULL-terminate unix pathname addresses selftests/landlock: Remove invalid unix socket bind() selftests/landlock: Add missing connect(minimal AF_UNSPEC) test selftests/landlock: Fix TCP bind(AF_UNSPEC) test case landlock: Fix TCP handling of short AF_UNSPEC addresses landlock: Fix formatting
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/audit.c2
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/domain.h2
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/errata/abi-6.h2
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/fs.c14
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/net.c118
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/ruleset.c1
-rw-r--r--security/landlock/task.c12
7 files changed, 87 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.c b/security/landlock/audit.c
index c52d079cdb77..e899995f1fd5 100644
--- a/security/landlock/audit.c
+++ b/security/landlock/audit.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static size_t get_denied_layer(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
long youngest_layer = -1;
for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req, layer_masks_size) {
- const access_mask_t mask = (*layer_masks)[access_bit];
+ const layer_mask_t mask = (*layer_masks)[access_bit];
long layer;
if (!mask)
diff --git a/security/landlock/domain.h b/security/landlock/domain.h
index 7fb70b25f85a..621f054c9a2b 100644
--- a/security/landlock/domain.h
+++ b/security/landlock/domain.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct landlock_hierarchy {
*/
atomic64_t num_denials;
/**
- * @id: Landlock domain ID, sets once at domain creation time.
+ * @id: Landlock domain ID, set once at domain creation time.
*/
u64 id;
/**
diff --git a/security/landlock/errata/abi-6.h b/security/landlock/errata/abi-6.h
index df7bc0e1fdf4..5113a829f87e 100644
--- a/security/landlock/errata/abi-6.h
+++ b/security/landlock/errata/abi-6.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
* This fix addresses an issue where signal scoping was overly restrictive,
* preventing sandboxed threads from signaling other threads within the same
* process if they belonged to different domains. Because threads are not
- * security boundaries, user space might assume that any thread within the same
+ * security boundaries, user space might assume that all threads within the same
* process can send signals between themselves (see :manpage:`nptl(7)` and
* :manpage:`libpsx(3)`). Consistent with :manpage:`ptrace(2)` behavior, direct
* interaction between threads of the same process should always be allowed.
diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index fe794875ad46..8205673c8b1c 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
@@ -939,7 +939,12 @@ jump_up:
}
path_put(&walker_path);
- if (!allowed_parent1) {
+ /*
+ * Check CONFIG_AUDIT to enable elision of log_request_parent* and
+ * associated caller's stack variables thanks to dead code elimination.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
+ if (!allowed_parent1 && log_request_parent1) {
log_request_parent1->type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_FS_ACCESS;
log_request_parent1->audit.type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_PATH;
log_request_parent1->audit.u.path = *path;
@@ -949,7 +954,7 @@ jump_up:
ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks_parent1);
}
- if (!allowed_parent2) {
+ if (!allowed_parent2 && log_request_parent2) {
log_request_parent2->type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_FS_ACCESS;
log_request_parent2->audit.type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_PATH;
log_request_parent2->audit.u.path = *path;
@@ -958,6 +963,8 @@ jump_up:
log_request_parent2->layer_masks_size =
ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks_parent2);
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
+
return allowed_parent1 && allowed_parent2;
}
@@ -1314,7 +1321,8 @@ static void hook_sb_delete(struct super_block *const sb)
* second call to iput() for the same Landlock object. Also
* checks I_NEW because such inode cannot be tied to an object.
*/
- if (inode_state_read(inode) & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW)) {
+ if (inode_state_read(inode) &
+ (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW)) {
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
continue;
}
diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
index 1f3915a90a80..e6367e30e5b0 100644
--- a/security/landlock/net.c
+++ b/security/landlock/net.c
@@ -71,6 +71,61 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
switch (address->sa_family) {
case AF_UNSPEC:
+ if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
+ /*
+ * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves
+ * the TCP association, which have the same effect as
+ * closing the connection while retaining the socket
+ * object (i.e., the file descriptor). As for dropping
+ * privileges, closing connections is always allowed.
+ *
+ * For a TCP access control system, this request is
+ * legitimate. Let the network stack handle potential
+ * inconsistencies and return -EINVAL if needed.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ } else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
+ /*
+ * Binding to an AF_UNSPEC address is treated
+ * differently by IPv4 and IPv6 sockets. The socket's
+ * family may change under our feet due to
+ * setsockopt(IPV6_ADDRFORM), but that's ok: we either
+ * reject entirely or require
+ * %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP for the given port, so
+ * it cannot be used to bypass the policy.
+ *
+ * IPv4 sockets map AF_UNSPEC to AF_INET for
+ * retrocompatibility for bind accesses, only if the
+ * address is INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). IPv6
+ * sockets always reject it.
+ *
+ * Checking the address is required to not wrongfully
+ * return -EACCES instead of -EAFNOSUPPORT or -EINVAL.
+ * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle
+ * these checks, but it is safer to return a proper
+ * error and test consistency thanks to kselftest.
+ */
+ if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family == AF_INET) {
+ const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
+ (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
+
+ if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr !=
+ htonl(INADDR_ANY))
+ return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+ } else {
+ if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ else
+ return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+ }
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ }
+ /* Only for bind(AF_UNSPEC+INADDR_ANY) on IPv4 socket. */
+ fallthrough;
case AF_INET: {
const struct sockaddr_in *addr4;
@@ -119,57 +174,18 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
return 0;
}
- /* Specific AF_UNSPEC handling. */
- if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC) {
- /*
- * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
- * association, which have the same effect as closing the
- * connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
- * descriptor). As for dropping privileges, closing
- * connections is always allowed.
- *
- * For a TCP access control system, this request is legitimate.
- * Let the network stack handle potential inconsistencies and
- * return -EINVAL if needed.
- */
- if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * For compatibility reason, accept AF_UNSPEC for bind
- * accesses (mapped to AF_INET) only if the address is
- * INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). Checking the address is
- * required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of
- * -EAFNOSUPPORT.
- *
- * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle these
- * checks, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
- * consistency thanks to kselftest.
- */
- if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
- /* addrlen has already been checked for AF_UNSPEC. */
- const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
- (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
-
- if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family != AF_INET)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
- return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
- }
- } else {
- /*
- * Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
- * -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
- * only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
- *
- * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
- * check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
- * consistency thanks to kselftest.
- */
- if (address->sa_family != sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family)
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ /*
+ * Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
+ * -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
+ * only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
+ *
+ * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
+ * check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
+ * consistency thanks to kselftest.
+ */
+ if (address->sa_family != sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family &&
+ address->sa_family != AF_UNSPEC)
+ return -EINVAL;
id.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)port;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
index dfcdc19ea268..0a5b0c76b3f7 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "access.h"
-#include "audit.h"
#include "domain.h"
#include "limits.h"
#include "object.h"
diff --git a/security/landlock/task.c b/security/landlock/task.c
index 2385017418ca..833bc0cfe5c9 100644
--- a/security/landlock/task.c
+++ b/security/landlock/task.c
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static int hook_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *const child,
const unsigned int mode)
{
const struct landlock_cred_security *parent_subject;
- const struct landlock_ruleset *child_dom;
int err;
/* Quick return for non-landlocked tasks. */
@@ -96,7 +95,8 @@ static int hook_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *const child,
scoped_guard(rcu)
{
- child_dom = landlock_get_task_domain(child);
+ const struct landlock_ruleset *const child_dom =
+ landlock_get_task_domain(child);
err = domain_ptrace(parent_subject->domain, child_dom);
}
@@ -166,15 +166,15 @@ static int hook_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *const parent)
}
/**
- * domain_is_scoped - Checks if the client domain is scoped in the same
- * domain as the server.
+ * domain_is_scoped - Check if an interaction from a client/sender to a
+ * server/receiver should be restricted based on scope controls.
*
* @client: IPC sender domain.
* @server: IPC receiver domain.
* @scope: The scope restriction criteria.
*
- * Returns: True if the @client domain is scoped to access the @server,
- * unless the @server is also scoped in the same domain as @client.
+ * Returns: True if @server is in a different domain from @client, and @client
+ * is scoped to access @server (i.e. access should be denied).
*/
static bool domain_is_scoped(const struct landlock_ruleset *const client,
const struct landlock_ruleset *const server,