mm: drop stale folio_ref_count()==1 check in do_swap_page reuse logic

The "we just allocated them without exposing them to the swapcache" case
no longer exists, as Kairui has routed synchronous I/O through the
swapcache as well in his series "unify swapin use swap cache and cleanup
flags"[1].  As a result, folio_ref_count() should never be 1 in this path,
since at least two references are held (base ref plus swapcache).  Remove
the folio_ref_count()==1 check and update the comment accordingly.

The ksm_might_need_to_copy() check may allocate a fresh folio with
folio_ref_count() == 1.  Along that path, exclusive has already been
set to true, so the folio can still be reused correctly.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: update comment, per David]
  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/3a185a5d-2f2c-4e9d-9cd9-8bdb236dfc5c@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260701235955.36126-3-baohua@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251220-swap-table-p2-v5-0-8862a265a033@tencent.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions