summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv4/ipvs/git@git.tavy.me:linux.git
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>2026-03-30 19:44:14 -0700
committerEric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>2026-03-31 17:19:15 -0700
commit1aa82df3eb4d1a28c02a9d0062c6ed0db1a59bac (patch)
tree6114408eb0c802c18e663fcf1036829ac51312fd /net/ipv4/ipvs/git@git.tavy.me:linux.git
parentd2a68aba8505ce88b39c34ecb3b707c776af79d4 (diff)
lib/crypto: aescfb: Don't disable IRQs during AES block encryption
aes_encrypt() now uses AES instructions when available instead of always using table-based code. AES instructions are constant-time and don't benefit from disabling IRQs as a constant-time hardening measure. In fact, on two architectures (arm and riscv) disabling IRQs is counterproductive because it prevents the AES instructions from being used. (See the may_use_simd() implementation on those architectures.) Therefore, let's remove the IRQ disabling/enabling and leave the choice of constant-time hardening measures to the AES library code. Note that currently the arm table-based AES code (which runs on arm kernels that don't have ARMv8 CE) disables IRQs, while the generic table-based AES code does not. So this does technically regress in constant-time hardening when that generic code is used. But as discussed in commit a22fd0e3c495 ("lib/crypto: aes: Introduce improved AES library") I think just leaving IRQs enabled is the right choice. Disabling them is slow and can cause problems, and AES instructions (which modern CPUs have) solve the problem in a much better way anyway. Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331024414.51545-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/ipvs/git@git.tavy.me:linux.git')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions