diff options
| author | Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com> | 2026-05-07 20:28:00 +0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> | 2026-05-31 10:59:37 +0100 |
| commit | 8e9c394520844fb11404b4f9f16749f90e1d8627 (patch) | |
| tree | 514e5968044709b9c7d507b060a9f15828809f5a /tools/perf/scripts/python/flamegraph.py | |
| parent | ae008f65398c2071b0b5510998d86f51d285a77d (diff) | |
iio: chemical: scd30: reject (response=NULL, size>0) in scd30_i2c_command()
scd30_i2c_command() takes an opaque "response" buffer plus its size.
At the start of the function the code already checks if response is
NULL (via the rsp local), but the response-decoding loop after the
i2c transfer always dereferences rsp without re-checking. With the
current callers in scd30_core.c this is harmless, since write
commands pass response=NULL together with size=0 (so the loop body
is never entered).
The (response=NULL, size>0) combination has no useful meaning: there
is nowhere to put the bytes that come back from the chip. Treat it
as an invalid argument and bail out at the top of the function with
-EINVAL, instead of silently doing the i2c transfer and dereferencing
a NULL pointer in the decode loop.
smatch flagged the inconsistency:
drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c:104 scd30_i2c_command() error: we
previously assumed rsp could be null (see line 77)
No functional change for the existing callers, which only ever use
(response=NULL, size=0) for writes and (response!=NULL, size>0) for
reads.
Signed-off-by: Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/flamegraph.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
