diff options
| author | Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> | 2026-08-04 00:21:54 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2026-08-06 11:52:48 -0700 |
| commit | 594d905195024b228c962627ae5ae7c17bd582a4 (patch) | |
| tree | 89a99847656e033d4732c6582864c278aaab2c5b /tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-report | |
| parent | 315f4bd234b3b8a3ed3a71fd4c53b110cf373720 (diff) | |
af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().
Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.
The scenario is as follows:
1) Create two SCCs:
X -. A <-> B
^--'
2) Run the following concurrently:
2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X
2-2) close() both A and B
At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges()
publishes a new edge (B <-> B) to GC but its skb is not queued
by skb_queue_tail().
If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered,
it judges A <-> B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot
collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B <-> B edge.
X -. A <-> B -. This edge is visible
^--' ^..' but skb is not
This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge
B as dead as well and free it finally.
X -. A <.> B -.
^--' ^--'
However, X's SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(),
and it iterates over A through B's scc_entry.
Let's unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().
Fixes: 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm.")
Reported-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
Fixes: 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm.").
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260804002155.2233594-1-kuniyu@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-report')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
