diff options
| author | Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> | 2026-02-03 19:10:46 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2026-03-12 15:34:18 +0100 |
| commit | 883c5a2bc934c165c4491d1ef7da0ac4e9765077 (patch) | |
| tree | d600767ab17e2c1ac60caadba532e30625616550 /tools/perf/lib/Documentation/tutorial/git@git.tavy.me:linux-stable.git | |
| parent | 8324a54f604da18f21070702a8ad82ab2062787b (diff) | |
serial: 8250_dw: Rework dw8250_handle_irq() locking and IIR handling
dw8250_handle_irq() takes port's lock multiple times with no good
reason to release it in between and calls serial8250_handle_irq()
that also takes port's lock.
Take port's lock only once in dw8250_handle_irq() and use
serial8250_handle_irq_locked() to avoid releasing port's lock in
between.
As IIR_NO_INT check in serial8250_handle_irq() was outside of port's
lock, it has to be done already in dw8250_handle_irq().
DW UART can, in addition to IIR_NO_INT, report BUSY_DETECT (0x7) which
collided with the IIR_NO_INT (0x1) check in serial8250_handle_irq()
(because & is used instead of ==) meaning that no other work is done by
serial8250_handle_irq() during an BUSY_DETECT interrupt.
This allows reorganizing code in dw8250_handle_irq() to do both
IIR_NO_INT and BUSY_DETECT handling right at the start simplifying
the logic.
Tested-by: Bandal, Shankar <shankar.bandal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Murthy, Shanth <shanth.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203171049.4353-5-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/lib/Documentation/tutorial/git@git.tavy.me:linux-stable.git')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
