summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-03-21iio: frequency: ad9523: add dev variableAntoniu Miclaus
Introduce a local struct device variable in ad9523_probe() to simplify subsequent conversions and improve code readability. Split pdata declaration and assignment since the result is validated immediately after. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: frequency: admv4420: use dev_err_probeAntoniu Miclaus
Use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err() in the probe path to ensure proper handling of deferred probing and to simplify error handling. Also fix the format specifier for vco_freq_hz from %lld to %llu since it is u64 (unsigned), and add missing newline to the error message. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: frequency: admv4420: add dev variableAntoniu Miclaus
Introduce a local struct device variable in admv4420_probe() to simplify subsequent conversions and improve code readability. No functional change. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Format block commentsGiorgi Tchankvetadze
Format the multi-line comment in ad_sd_set_comm() according to the kernel multi-line comment style. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Giorgi Tchankvetadze <giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: adc: ti-ads7950: use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts_unaligned()David Lechner
Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts_unaligned() to avoid unaligned access when writing the timestamp in the rx_buf. The previous implementation would have been fine on architectures that support 4-byte alignment of 64-bit integers but could cause issues on architectures that require 8-byte alignment. Fixes: 902c4b2446d4 ("iio: adc: New driver for TI ADS7950 chips") Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: light: vcnl4035: fix scan buffer on big-endianDavid Lechner
Rework vcnl4035_trigger_consumer_handler() so that we are not passing what should be a u16 value as an int * to regmap_read(). This won't work on bit endian systems. Instead, add a new unsigned int variable to pass to regmap_read(). Then copy that value into the buffer struct. The buffer array is replaced with a struct since there is only one value being read. This allows us to use the correct u16 data type and has a side-effect of simplifying the alignment specification. Also fix the endianness of the scan format from little-endian to CPU endianness. Since we are using regmap to read the value, it will be CPU-endian. Fixes: 55707294c4eb ("iio: light: Add support for vishay vcnl4035") Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21ftrace: Use hash argument for tmp_ops in update_ftrace_direct_modJiri Olsa
The modify logic registers temporary ftrace_ops object (tmp_ops) to trigger the slow path for all direct callers to be able to safely modify attached addresses. At the moment we use ops->func_hash for tmp_ops filter, which represents all the systems attachments. It's faster to use just the passed hash filter, which contains only the modified sites and is always a subset of the ops->func_hash. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260312123738.129926-1-jolsa@kernel.org Fixes: e93672f770d7 ("ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_mod function") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2026-03-21ring-buffer: Fix to update per-subbuf entries of persistent ring bufferMasami Hiramatsu (Google)
Since the validation loop in rb_meta_validate_events() updates the same cpu_buffer->head_page->entries, the other subbuf entries are not updated. Fix to use head_page to update the entries field, since it is the cursor in this loop. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Fixes: 5f3b6e839f3c ("ring-buffer: Validate boot range memory events") Link: https://patch.msgid.link/177391153882.193994.17158784065013676533.stgit@mhiramat.tok.corp.google.com Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2026-03-21iio: adc: ti-adc161s626: use DMA-safe memory for spi_read()David Lechner
Add a DMA-safe buffer and use it for spi_read() instead of a stack memory. All SPI buffers must be DMA-safe. Since we only need up to 3 bytes, we just use a u8[] instead of __be16 and __be32 and change the conversion functions appropriately. Fixes: 4d671b71beef ("iio: adc: ti-adc161s626: add support for TI 1-channel differential ADCs") Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21tracing: Fix trace_marker copy link list updatesSteven Rostedt
When the "copy_trace_marker" option is enabled for an instance, anything written into /sys/kernel/tracing/trace_marker is also copied into that instances buffer. When the option is set, that instance's trace_array descriptor is added to the marker_copies link list. This list is protected by RCU, as all iterations uses an RCU protected list traversal. When the instance is deleted, all the flags that were enabled are cleared. This also clears the copy_trace_marker flag and removes the trace_array descriptor from the list. The issue is after the flags are called, a direct call to update_marker_trace() is performed to clear the flag. This function returns true if the state of the flag changed and false otherwise. If it returns true here, synchronize_rcu() is called to make sure all readers see that its removed from the list. But since the flag was already cleared, the state does not change and the synchronization is never called, leaving a possible UAF bug. Move the clearing of all flags below the updating of the copy_trace_marker option which then makes sure the synchronization is performed. Also use the flag for checking the state in update_marker_trace() instead of looking at if the list is empty. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260318185512.1b6c7db4@gandalf.local.home Fixes: 7b382efd5e8a ("tracing: Allow the top level trace_marker to write into another instances") Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260225133122.237275-1-sashal@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2026-03-21tracing: Fix failure to read user space from system call trace eventsSteven Rostedt
The system call trace events call trace_user_fault_read() to read the user space part of some system calls. This is done by grabbing a per-cpu buffer, disabling migration, enabling preemption, calling copy_from_user(), disabling preemption, enabling migration and checking if the task was preempted while preemption was enabled. If it was, the buffer is considered corrupted and it tries again. There's a safety mechanism that will fail out of this loop if it fails 100 times (with a warning). That warning message was triggered in some pi_futex stress tests. Enabling the sched_switch trace event and traceoff_on_warning, showed the problem: pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981648: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981651: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981656: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981659: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981664: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981667: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981671: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981675: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981679: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981682: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981687: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981690: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981695: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981698: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981703: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981706: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981711: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981714: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981719: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981722: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981727: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981730: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 pi_mutex_hammer-1375 [006] d..21 138.981735: sched_switch: prev_comm=pi_mutex_hammer prev_pid=1375 prev_prio=95 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/6 next_pid=47 next_prio=0 migration/6-47 [006] d..2. 138.981738: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/6 prev_pid=47 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=pi_mutex_hammer next_pid=1375 next_prio=95 What happened was the task 1375 was flagged to be migrated. When preemption was enabled, the migration thread woke up to migrate that task, but failed because migration for that task was disabled. This caused the loop to fail to exit because the task scheduled out while trying to read user space. Every time the task enabled preemption the migration thread would schedule in, try to migrate the task, fail and let the task continue. But because the loop would only enable preemption with migration disabled, it would always fail because each time it enabled preemption to read user space, the migration thread would try to migrate it. To solve this, when the loop fails to read user space without being scheduled out, enabled and disable preemption with migration enabled. This will allow the migration task to successfully migrate the task and the next loop should succeed to read user space without being scheduled out. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260316130734.1858a998@gandalf.local.home Fixes: 64cf7d058a005 ("tracing: Have trace_marker use per-cpu data to read user space") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2026-03-21iio: adc: ti-adc161s626: fix buffer read on big-endianDavid Lechner
Rework ti_adc_trigger_handler() to properly handle data on big-endian architectures. The scan data format is 16-bit CPU-endian, so we can't cast it to a int * on big-endian and expect it to work. Instead, we introduce a local int variable to read the data into, and then copy it to the buffer. Since the buffer isn't passed to any SPI functions, we don't need it to be DMA-safe. So we can drop it from the driver data struct and just use stack memory for the scan data. Since there is only one data value (plus timestamp), we don't need an array and can just declare a struct with the correct data type instead. Also fix alignment of iio_get_time_ns() to ( while we are touching this. Fixes: 4d671b71beef ("iio: adc: ti-adc161s626: add support for TI 1-channel differential ADCs") Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21tracing: Revert "tracing: Remove pid in task_rename tracing output"Xuewen Yan
This reverts commit e3f6a42272e028c46695acc83fc7d7c42f2750ad. The commit says that the tracepoint only deals with the current task, however the following case is not current task: comm_write() { p = get_proc_task(inode); if (!p) return -ESRCH; if (same_thread_group(current, p)) set_task_comm(p, buffer); } where set_task_comm() calls __set_task_comm() which records the update of p and not current. So revert the patch to show pid. Cc: <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: <elver@google.com> Cc: <kees@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260306075954.4533-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com Fixes: e3f6a42272e0 ("tracing: Remove pid in task_rename tracing output") Reported-by: Guohua Yan <guohua.yan@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Add a test cases for sync_linked_regs regarding zext propagationDaniel Borkmann
Add multiple test cases for linked register tracking with alu32 ops: - Add a test that checks sync_linked_regs() regarding reg->id (the linked target register) for BPF_ADD_CONST32 rather than known_reg->id (the branch register). - Add a test case for linked register tracking that exposes the cross-type sync_linked_regs() bug. One register uses alu32 (w7 += 1, BPF_ADD_CONST32) and another uses alu64 (r8 += 2, BPF_ADD_CONST64), both linked to the same base register. - Add a test case that exercises regsafe() path pruning when two execution paths reach the same program point with linked registers carrying different ADD_CONST flags (BPF_ADD_CONST32 from alu32 vs BPF_ADD_CONST64 from alu64). This particular test passes with and without the fix since the pruning will fail due to different ranges, but it would still be useful to carry this one as a regression test for the unreachable div by zero. With the fix applied all the tests pass: # LDLIBS=-static PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config --static' ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_linked_scalars [...] ./test_progs -t verifier_linked_scalars #602/1 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars: find linked scalars:OK #602/2 verifier_linked_scalars/sync_linked_regs_preserves_id:OK #602/3 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_neg:OK #602/4 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_neg_sub:OK #602/5 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_neg_alu32_add:OK #602/6 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_neg_alu32_sub:OK #602/7 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_pos:OK #602/8 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_sub_neg_imm:OK #602/9 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_double_add:OK #602/10 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_sync_delta_overflow:OK #602/11 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_sync_delta_overflow_large_range:OK #602/12 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_alu32_big_offset:OK #602/13 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_alu32_basic:OK #602/14 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_alu32_wrap:OK #602/15 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_alu32_zext_linked_reg:OK #602/16 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_alu32_alu64_cross_type:OK #602/17 verifier_linked_scalars/scalars_alu32_alu64_regsafe_pruning:OK #602/18 verifier_linked_scalars/alu32_negative_offset:OK #602/19 verifier_linked_scalars/spurious_precision_marks:OK #602 verifier_linked_scalars:OK Summary: 1/19 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Co-developed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319211507.213816-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Fix sync_linked_regs regarding BPF_ADD_CONST32 zext propagationDaniel Borkmann
Jenny reported that in sync_linked_regs() the BPF_ADD_CONST32 flag is checked on known_reg (the register narrowed by a conditional branch) instead of reg (the linked target register created by an alu32 operation). Example case with reg: 1. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32() 2. r7 = r6 (linked, same id) 3. w7 += 5 (alu32 -- r7 gets BPF_ADD_CONST32, zero-extended by CPU) 4. if w6 < 0xFFFFFFFC goto safe (narrows r6 to [0xFFFFFFFC, 0xFFFFFFFF]) 5. sync_linked_regs() propagates to r7 but does NOT call zext_32_to_64() 6. Verifier thinks r7 is [0x100000001, 0x100000004] instead of [1, 4] Since known_reg above does not have BPF_ADD_CONST32 set above, zext_32_to_64() is never called on alu32-derived linked registers. This causes the verifier to track incorrect 64-bit bounds, while the CPU correctly zero-extends the 32-bit result. The code checking known_reg->id was correct however (see scalars_alu32_wrap selftest case), but the real fix needs to handle both directions - zext propagation should be done when either register has BPF_ADD_CONST32, since the linked relationship involves a 32-bit operation regardless of which side has the flag. Example case with known_reg (exercised also by scalars_alu32_wrap): 1. r1 = r0; w1 += 0x100 (alu32 -- r1 gets BPF_ADD_CONST32) 2. if r1 > 0x80 - known_reg = r1 (has BPF_ADD_CONST32), reg = r0 (doesn't) Hence, fix it by checking for (reg->id | known_reg->id) & BPF_ADD_CONST32. Moreover, sync_linked_regs() also has a soundness issue when two linked registers used different ALU widths: one with BPF_ADD_CONST32 and the other with BPF_ADD_CONST64. The delta relationship between linked registers assumes the same arithmetic width though. When one register went through alu32 (CPU zero-extends the 32-bit result) and the other went through alu64 (no zero-extension), the propagation produces incorrect bounds. Example: r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32() // fully unknown if r6 >= 0x100000000 goto out // constrain r6 to [0, U32_MAX] r7 = r6 w7 += 1 // alu32: r7.id = N | BPF_ADD_CONST32 r8 = r6 r8 += 2 // alu64: r8.id = N | BPF_ADD_CONST64 if r7 < 0xFFFFFFFF goto out // narrows r7 to [0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF] At the branch on r7, sync_linked_regs() runs with known_reg=r7 (BPF_ADD_CONST32) and reg=r8 (BPF_ADD_CONST64). The delta path computes: r8 = r7 + (delta_r8 - delta_r7) = 0xFFFFFFFF + (2 - 1) = 0x100000000 Then, because known_reg->id has BPF_ADD_CONST32, zext_32_to_64(r8) is called, truncating r8 to [0, 0]. But r8 used a 64-bit ALU op -- the CPU does NOT zero-extend it. The actual CPU value of r8 is 0xFFFFFFFE + 2 = 0x100000000, not 0. The verifier now underestimates r8's 64-bit bounds, which is a soundness violation. Fix sync_linked_regs() by skipping propagation when the two registers have mixed ALU widths (one BPF_ADD_CONST32, the other BPF_ADD_CONST64). Lastly, fix regsafe() used for path pruning: the existing checks used "& BPF_ADD_CONST" to test for offset linkage, which treated BPF_ADD_CONST32 and BPF_ADD_CONST64 as equivalent. Fixes: 7a433e519364 ("bpf: Support negative offsets, BPF_SUB, and alu32 for linked register tracking") Reported-by: Jenny Guanni Qu <qguanni@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319211507.213816-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21Merge branch 'libbpf-add-bpf_program__clone-for-individual-program-loading'Alexei Starovoitov
Mykyta Yatsenko says: ==================== libbpf: Add bpf_program__clone() for individual program loading This series adds bpf_program__clone() to libbpf and converts veristat to use it, replacing the costly per-program object re-opening pattern. veristat needs to load each BPF program in isolation to collect per-program verification statistics. Previously it achieved this by opening a fresh bpf_object for every program, disabling autoload on all but the target, and loading the whole object. For object files with many programs this meant repeating ELF parsing and BTF processing N times. Patch 1 introduces bpf_program__clone(), which loads a single program from a prepared object into the kernel and returns an fd owned by the caller. It populates load parameters from the prepared object and lets callers override any field via bpf_prog_load_opts. Fields written by the prog_prepare_load_fn callback (expected_attach_type, attach_btf_id, attach_btf_obj_fd) are seeded from prog/obj defaults before the callback, then overridden with caller opts after, so explicit values always win. Patch 2 converts veristat to prepare the object once and clone each program individually, eliminating redundant work. Patch 3 adds a selftest verifying that caller-provided attach_btf_id overrides are respected by bpf_program__clone(). Performance Tested on selftests: 918 objects, ~4270 programs: - Wall time: 36.88s -> 23.18s (37% faster) - User time: 20.80s -> 16.07s (23% faster) - Kernel time: 12.07s -> 6.06s (50% faster) Per-program loading also improves coverage: 83 programs that previously failed now succeed. Known regression: - Program-containing maps (PROG_ARRAY, DEVMAP, CPUMAP) track owner program type. Programs with incompatible attributes loaded against a shared map will be rejected. This is expected kernel behavior. Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> --- Changes in v5: - Fix overriding of the attach_btf_id, attach_btf_fd, etc: the override provided by the caller is applied after prog_prepare_load_fn(). - Added selftest to verify attach_btf_id override works as expected. - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260316-veristat_prepare-v3-0-94e5691e0494@meta.com/ Changes in v4: - Replace OPTS_SET() with direct struct assignment for local bpf_prog_load_opts in bpf_program__clone() (libbpf.c) - Remove unnecessary pattr pointer indirection (libbpf.c) - Separate input and output fields in bpf_program__clone(): input fields (prog_flags, fd_array, etc.) are merged from caller opts before the callback; output fields (expected_attach_type, attach_btf_id, attach_btf_obj_fd) are initialized from prog/obj defaults for the callback, then overridden with caller opts after, so explicit caller values always win (libbpf.c) - Add selftest for attach_btf_id override - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260206-veristat_prepare-a4a041873c53-v3@meta.com Changes in v3: - Clone fd_array_cnt in bpf_object__clone() - In veristat do not fail if bpf_object__prepare() fails, continue per-program processing to produce per program output - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260220-veristat_prepare-v2-0-15bff49022a7@meta.com Changes in v2: - Removed map cloning entirely (libbpf.c) - Renamed bpf_prog_clone() -> bpf_program__clone() - Removed unnecessary obj NULL check (libbpf.c) - Fixed opts handling — no longer mutates caller's opts (libbpf.c) - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260212-veristat_prepare-v1-0-c351023fb0db@meta.com/ --- ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260317-veristat_prepare-v4-0-74193d4cc9d9@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Test bpf_program__clone() attach_btf_id overrideMykyta Yatsenko
Add a test that verifies bpf_program__clone() respects caller-provided attach_btf_id in bpf_prog_load_opts. The BPF program has SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1"). It is cloned twice from the same prepared object: first with no opts, verifying the callback resolves attach_btf_id from sec_name to bpf_fentry_test1; then with attach_btf_id overridden to bpf_fentry_test2, verifying the loaded program is actually attached to bpf_fentry_test2. Both results are checked via bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(). Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260317-veristat_prepare-v4-3-74193d4cc9d9@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Use bpf_program__clone() in veristatMykyta Yatsenko
Replace veristat's per-program object re-opening with bpf_program__clone(). Previously, veristat opened a separate bpf_object for every program in a multi-program object file, iterated all programs to enable only the target one, and then loaded the entire object. Use bpf_object__prepare() once, then call bpf_program__clone() for each program individually. This lets veristat load programs one at a time from a single prepared object. The caller now owns the returned fd and closes it after collecting stats. Remove the special single-program fast path and the per-file early exit in handle_verif_mode() so all files are always processed. Split fixup_obj() into fixup_obj_maps() for object-wide map fixups that must run before bpf_object__prepare(), and fixup_obj() for per-program fixups (struct_ops masking, freplace type guessing) that run before each bpf_program__clone() call. Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260317-veristat_prepare-v4-2-74193d4cc9d9@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21libbpf: Introduce bpf_program__clone()Mykyta Yatsenko
Add bpf_program__clone() API that loads a single BPF program from a prepared BPF object into the kernel, returning a file descriptor owned by the caller. After bpf_object__prepare(), callers can use bpf_program__clone() to load individual programs with custom bpf_prog_load_opts, instead of loading all programs at once via bpf_object__load(). Non-zero fields in opts override the defaults derived from the program and object internals; passing NULL opts populates everything automatically. Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260317-veristat_prepare-v4-1-74193d4cc9d9@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21Merge branch 'bpf-fix-unsound-scalar-forking-for-bpf_or'Alexei Starovoitov
Daniel Wade says: ==================== bpf: Fix unsound scalar forking for BPF_OR maybe_fork_scalars() unconditionally sets the pushed path dst register to 0 for both BPF_AND and BPF_OR. For AND this is correct (0 & K == 0), but for OR it is wrong (0 | K == K, not 0). This causes the verifier to track an incorrect value on the pushed path, leading to a verifier/runtime divergence that allows out-of-bounds map value access. v4: Use block comment style for multi-line comments in selftests (Amery Hung) Add Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags v3: Use single-line comment style in selftests (Alexei Starovoitov) v2: Use push_stack(env, env->insn_idx, ...) to re-execute the insn on the pushed path (Eduard Zingerman) ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260314021521.128361-1-danjwade95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Add tests for maybe_fork_scalars() OR vs AND handlingDaniel Wade
Add three test cases to verifier_bounds.c to verify that maybe_fork_scalars() correctly tracks register values for BPF_OR operations with constant source operands: 1. or_scalar_fork_rejects_oob: After ARSH 63 + OR 8, the pushed path should have dst = 8. With value_size = 8, accessing map_value + 8 is out of bounds and must be rejected. 2. and_scalar_fork_still_works: Regression test ensuring AND forking continues to work. ARSH 63 + AND 4 produces pushed dst = 0 and current dst = 4, both within value_size = 8. 3. or_scalar_fork_allows_inbounds: After ARSH 63 + OR 4, the pushed path has dst = 4, which is within value_size = 8 and should be accepted. These tests exercise the fix in the previous patch, which makes the pushed path re-execute the ALU instruction so it computes the correct result for BPF_OR. Signed-off-by: Daniel Wade <danjwade95@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260314021521.128361-3-danjwade95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Fix unsound scalar forking in maybe_fork_scalars() for BPF_ORDaniel Wade
maybe_fork_scalars() is called for both BPF_AND and BPF_OR when the source operand is a constant. When dst has signed range [-1, 0], it forks the verifier state: the pushed path gets dst = 0, the current path gets dst = -1. For BPF_AND this is correct: 0 & K == 0. For BPF_OR this is wrong: 0 | K == K, not 0. The pushed path therefore tracks dst as 0 when the runtime value is K, producing an exploitable verifier/runtime divergence that allows out-of-bounds map access. Fix this by passing env->insn_idx (instead of env->insn_idx + 1) to push_stack(), so the pushed path re-executes the ALU instruction with dst = 0 and naturally computes the correct result for any opcode. Fixes: bffacdb80b93 ("bpf: Recognize special arithmetic shift in the verifier") Signed-off-by: Daniel Wade <danjwade95@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260314021521.128361-2-danjwade95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21Merge branch 'bpf-fix-abs-int_min-undefined-behavior-in-interpreter-sdiv-smod'Alexei Starovoitov
Jenny Guanni Qu says: ==================== bpf: Fix abs(INT_MIN) undefined behavior in interpreter sdiv/smod The BPF interpreter's signed 32-bit division and modulo handlers use abs() on s32 operands, which is undefined for S32_MIN. This causes the interpreter to compute wrong results, creating a mismatch with the verifier's range tracking. For example, INT_MIN / 2 returns 0x40000000 instead of the correct 0xC0000000. The verifier tracks the correct range, so a crafted BPF program can exploit the mismatch for out-of-bounds map value access (confirmed by KASAN). Patch 1 introduces abs_s32() which handles S32_MIN correctly and replaces all 8 abs((s32)...) call sites. s32 is the only affected case -- the s64 handlers do not use abs(). Patch 2 adds selftests covering sdiv32 and smod32 with INT_MIN dividend to prevent regression. Changes since v4: - Renamed __safe_abs32() to abs_s32() and dropped inline keyword per Alexei Starovoitov's feedback Changes since v3: - Fixed stray blank line deletion in the file header - Improved comment per Yonghong Song's suggestion - Added JIT vs interpreter context to selftest commit message Changes since v2: - Simplified to use -(u32)x per Mykyta Yatsenko's suggestion Changes since v1: - Moved helper above kerneldoc comment block to fix build warnings ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260311011116.2108005-1-qguanni@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Add tests for sdiv32/smod32 with INT_MIN dividendJenny Guanni Qu
Add tests to verify that signed 32-bit division and modulo operations produce correct results when the dividend is INT_MIN (0x80000000). The bug fixed in the previous commit only affects the BPF interpreter path. When JIT is enabled (the default on most architectures), the native CPU division instruction produces the correct result and these tests pass regardless. With bpf_jit_enable=0, the interpreter is used and without the previous fix, INT_MIN / 2 incorrectly returns 0x40000000 instead of 0xC0000000 due to abs(S32_MIN) undefined behavior, causing these tests to fail. Test cases: - SDIV32 INT_MIN / 2 = -1073741824 (imm and reg divisor) - SMOD32 INT_MIN % 2 = 0 (positive and negative divisor) Reviewed-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Jenny Guanni Qu <qguanni@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260311011116.2108005-3-qguanni@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Fix undefined behavior in interpreter sdiv/smod for INT_MINJenny Guanni Qu
The BPF interpreter's signed 32-bit division and modulo handlers use the kernel abs() macro on s32 operands. The abs() macro documentation (include/linux/math.h) explicitly states the result is undefined when the input is the type minimum. When DST contains S32_MIN (0x80000000), abs((s32)DST) triggers undefined behavior and returns S32_MIN unchanged on arm64/x86. This value is then sign-extended to u64 as 0xFFFFFFFF80000000, causing do_div() to compute the wrong result. The verifier's abstract interpretation (scalar32_min_max_sdiv) computes the mathematically correct result for range tracking, creating a verifier/interpreter mismatch that can be exploited for out-of-bounds map value access. Introduce abs_s32() which handles S32_MIN correctly by casting to u32 before negating, avoiding signed overflow entirely. Replace all 8 abs((s32)...) call sites in the interpreter's sdiv32/smod32 handlers. s32 is the only affected case -- the s64 division/modulo handlers do not use abs(). Fixes: ec0e2da95f72 ("bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions.") Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> Signed-off-by: Jenny Guanni Qu <qguanni@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260311011116.2108005-2-qguanni@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Add alignment flag for test_verifier 190 testcaseTiezhu Yang
There exists failure when executing the testcase "./test_verifier 190" if CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is not set on LoongArch. #190/p calls: two calls that return map_value with incorrect bool check FAIL ... misaligned access off (0x0; 0xffffffffffffffff)+0 size 8 ... Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED It means that the program has unaligned accesses, but the kernel sets CONFIG_ARCH_STRICT_ALIGN by default to enable -mstrict-align to prevent unaligned accesses, so add a flag F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS into the testcase to avoid the failure. This is somehow similar with the commit ce1f289f541e ("selftests/bpf: Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests"). Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> Acked-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260310064507.4228-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21iio: st_sensors: drop temporary kmalloc buffer and reuse buffer_dataSanjay Chitroda
Replace the per-call kmalloc() scratch buffer with the existing buffer_data[] field present in struct st_sensor_data. The existing buffer is DMA-aligned and sufficiently sized for all channel widths, so using it avoids unnecessary dynamic memory allocation on each read. This simplifies the code, removes redundant allocation and cleanup. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21Merge branch 'bpf-consolidate-sleepable-context-checks-in-verifier'Alexei Starovoitov
Puranjay Mohan says: ==================== bpf: Consolidate sleepable context checks in verifier The BPF verifier has multiple call-checking functions that independently validate whether sleepable operations are permitted in the current context. Each function open-codes its own checks against active_rcu_locks, active_preempt_locks, active_irq_id, and in_sleepable, duplicating the logic already provided by in_sleepable_context(). This series consolidates these scattered checks into calls to in_sleepable_context() across check_helper_call(), check_kfunc_call(), and check_func_call(), reducing code duplication and making the error reporting consistent. No functional change. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260318174327.3151925-1-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Consolidate sleepable checks in check_func_call()Puranjay Mohan
The sleepable context check for global function calls in check_func_call() open-codes the same checks that in_sleepable_context() already performs. Replace the open-coded check with a call to in_sleepable_context() and use non_sleepable_context_description() for the error message, consistent with check_helper_call() and check_kfunc_call(). Note that in_sleepable_context() also checks active_locks, which overlaps with the existing active_locks check above it. However, the two checks serve different purposes: the active_locks check rejects all global function calls while holding a lock (not just sleepable ones), so it must remain as a separate guard. Update the expected error messages in the irq and preempt_lock selftests to match. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260318174327.3151925-4-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Consolidate sleepable checks in check_kfunc_call()Puranjay Mohan
check_kfunc_call() has multiple scattered checks that reject sleepable kfuncs in various non-sleepable contexts (RCU, preempt-disabled, IRQ- disabled). These are the same conditions already checked by in_sleepable_context(), so replace them with a single consolidated check. This also simplifies the preempt lock tracking by flattening the nested if/else structure into a linear chain: preempt_disable increments, preempt_enable checks for underflow and decrements. The sleepable check is kept as a separate block since it is logically distinct from the lock accounting. No functional change since in_sleepable_context() checks all the same state (active_rcu_locks, active_preempt_locks, active_locks, active_irq_id, in_sleepable). Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260318174327.3151925-3-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Consolidate sleepable checks in check_helper_call()Puranjay Mohan
check_helper_call() prints the error message for every env->cur_state->active* element when calling a sleepable helper. Consolidate all of them into a single print statement. The check for env->cur_state->active_locks was not part of the removed print statements and will not be triggered with the consolidated print as well because it is checked in do_check() before check_helper_call() is even reached. Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260318174327.3151925-2-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_throw lock leak from subprogsIhor Solodrai
Add test cases to ensure the verifier correctly rejects bpf_throw from subprogs when RCU, preempt, or IRQ locks are held: * reject_subprog_rcu_lock_throw: subprog acquires bpf_rcu_read_lock and then calls bpf_throw * reject_subprog_throw_preempt_lock: always-throwing subprog called while caller holds bpf_preempt_disable * reject_subprog_throw_irq_lock: always-throwing subprog called while caller holds bpf_local_irq_save Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6 Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260320000809.643798-2-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21bpf: Fix exception exit lock checking for subprogsIhor Solodrai
process_bpf_exit_full() passes check_lock = !curframe to check_resource_leak(), which is false in cases when bpf_throw() is called from a static subprog. This makes check_resource_leak() to skip validation of active_rcu_locks, active_preempt_locks, and active_irq_id on exception exits from subprogs. At runtime bpf_throw() unwinds the stack via ORC without releasing any user-acquired locks, which may cause various issues as the result. Fix by setting check_lock = true for exception exits regardless of curframe, since exceptions bypass all intermediate frame cleanup. Update the error message prefix to "bpf_throw" for exception exits to distinguish them from normal BPF_EXIT. Fix reject_subprog_with_rcu_read_lock test which was previously passing for the wrong reason. Test program returned directly from the subprog call without closing the RCU section, so the error was triggered by the unclosed RCU lock on normal exit, not by bpf_throw. Update __msg annotations for affected tests to match the new "bpf_throw" error prefix. The spin_lock case is not affected because they are already checked [1] at the call site in do_check_insn() before bpf_throw can run. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/bpf/verifier.c?h=v7.0-rc4#n21098 Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6 Fixes: f18b03fabaa9 ("bpf: Implement BPF exceptions") Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260320000809.643798-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-03-21iio: adc: ina2xx: add INA236 supportChuang Zhu
The calibration divisor is not directly specified in the datasheet, but can be calculated: I = Current_LSB * Current Current = ShuntVoltage * CAL / calibration_divisor CAL = 0.00512 / (Current_LSB * Rshunt) ShuntVoltage = Vshunt / ShuntVoltage_LSB => I = (0.00512 / (calibration_divisor*ShuntVoltage_LSB)) * (Vshunt / Rshunt) Ohm's law, I = Vshunt / Rshunt => 0.00512 / (calibration_divisor*ShuntVoltage_LSB) = 1 ShuntVoltage_LSB = 2.5 uV = 0.0000025 V => calibration_divisor = 2048 Signed-off-by: Chuang Zhu <git@chuang.cz> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: light: as73211: remove duplicate zero init of scan.chan[3]David Lechner
Remove setting scan.chan[3] to zero. Since commit 433b99e92294 ("iio: light: as73211: Ensure buffer holes are zeroed"), the entire scan struct is zeroed before being filled with data, so this is redundant. Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: amplifiers: fix typo from Curren to CurrentShi Hao
Fix incorrect spelling from Curren to Current. Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: cdc: fix spelling mistakes in commentsShi Hao
Fix spelling mistakes in comments. - becaue -> because - reenable -> re-enable - irq's -> IRQs Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: chemical: rephrase comment and fix a typoShi Hao
Rephrase the comment and fix a spelling mistake. - insuffient -> insufficient Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: common: fix spelling mistakes in commentsShi Hao
Fix spelling mistakes in comments. - exepects -> expects - fuction -> function - theoritical -> theoretical - appopriate -> appropriate - iio -> IIO Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: test: fix typo from neeeds to needs in commentShi Hao
Fix incorrect spelling from neeeds to needs. Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: temp: fix spelling mistakes in commentsShi Hao
Fix spelling mistakes in comments. - catched -> caught - chanel -> channel Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21cgroup/dmem: remove region parameter from dmemcg_parse_limitThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
dmemcg_parse_limit does not use the region parameter. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2026-03-21iio: resolver: fix typo from degredation to degradationShi Hao
Fix incorrect spelling from degredation to degradation and fixed up some missing spaces prior to */ Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: proximity: fix typo from currenly to currentlyShi Hao
Fix incorrect spelling from currenly to currently. Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: pressure: fix spelling mistakes in commentsShi Hao
Fix several spelling mistakes in comments. - opertion -> operations - transfered -> transferred - usng -> using - externaly -> externally Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: magnetometer: fix various spelling mistakesShi Hao
Fix spelling mistakes in comments. - follwing -> following - atleast -> at least - occured -> occurred - measurment -> measurement - rougly -> roughly Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: imu: fix typo from adjustement to adjustmentShi Hao
Fix incorrect spelling in a comment. - adjustement -> adjustment Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: adc: add an article and use digitize instead of digitalizeShi Hao
Use digitize instead of digitalize, which is the correct technical term, and add an article for clarity. Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: light: fix several incorrect spellingsShi Hao
Fix spelling mistakes reported by codespell. - sesnor -> sensor - substraction -> subtraction - simulataneous -> simultaneous - proccessed -> processed - coefficents -> coefficients Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2026-03-21iio: accel: fix typo celcius to CelsiusShi Hao
Fix incorrect spelling in comments - celcius -> Celsius Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>