Pull seccomp updates from Kees Cook:
 "Major additions:

   - sysctl and seccomp operation to discover available actions
     (tyhicks)

   - new per-filter configurable logging infrastructure and sysctl
     (tyhicks)

   - SECCOMP_RET_LOG to log allowed syscalls (tyhicks)

   - SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS as the new strictest possible action

   - self-tests for new behaviors"

[ This is the seccomp part of the security pull request during the merge
  window that was nixed due to unrelated problems   - Linus ]

* tag 'seccomp-v4.14-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
  samples: Unrename SECCOMP_RET_KILL
  selftests/seccomp: Test thread vs process killing
  seccomp: Implement SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS action
  seccomp: Introduce SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS
  seccomp: Rename SECCOMP_RET_KILL to SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD
  seccomp: Action to log before allowing
  seccomp: Filter flag to log all actions except SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW
  seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support
  seccomp: Sysctl to configure actions that are allowed to be logged
  seccomp: Operation for checking if an action is available
  seccomp: Sysctl to display available actions
  seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection
  selftests/seccomp: Refactor RET_ERRNO tests
  selftests/seccomp: Add simple seccomp overhead benchmark
  selftests/seccomp: Add tests for basic ptrace actions

When a test process is not able to write to TH_LOG_STREAM, this step
mechanism enable to print the assert number which triggered the failure.
This can be enabled by setting _metadata->no_print to true at the
beginning of the test sequence.

Update the seccomp-bpf test to return 0 if a test succeeded.

This feature is needed for the Landlock tests.

Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGXu5j+D-FP8Kt9unNOqKrQJP4DYTpmgkJxWykZyrYiVPz3Y3Q@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>

This verifies that SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS is higher priority than
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD. (This also moves a bunch of defines up earlier
in the file to use them earlier.)

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>

In preparation for adding SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS, rename SECCOMP_RET_KILL
to the more accurate SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD.

The existing selftest values are intentionally left as SECCOMP_RET_KILL
just to be sure we're exercising the alias.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Add a new action, SECCOMP_RET_LOG, that logs a syscall before allowing
the syscall. At the implementation level, this action is identical to
the existing SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW action. However, it can be very useful when
initially developing a seccomp filter for an application. The developer
can set the default action to be SECCOMP_RET_LOG, maybe mark any
obviously needed syscalls with SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, and then put the
application through its paces. A list of syscalls that triggered the
default action (SECCOMP_RET_LOG) can be easily gleaned from the logs and
that list can be used to build the syscall whitelist. Finally, the
developer can change the default action to the desired value.

This provides a more friendly experience than seeing the application get
killed, then updating the filter and rebuilding the app, seeing the
application get killed due to a different syscall, then updating the
filter and rebuilding the app, etc.

The functionality is similar to what's supported by the various LSMs.
SELinux has permissive mode, AppArmor has complain mode, SMACK has
bring-up mode, etc.

SECCOMP_RET_LOG is given a lower value than SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW as allow
while logging is slightly more restrictive than quietly allowing.

Unfortunately, the tests added for SECCOMP_RET_LOG are not capable of
inspecting the audit log to verify that the syscall was logged.

With this patch, the logic for deciding if an action will be logged is:

if action == RET_ALLOW:
  do not log
else if action == RET_KILL && RET_KILL in actions_logged:
  log
else if action == RET_LOG && RET_LOG in actions_logged:
  log
else if filter-requests-logging && action in actions_logged:
  log
else if audit_enabled && process-is-being-audited:
  log
else:
  do not log

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Add a new filter flag, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG, that enables logging for
all actions except for SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW for the given filter.

SECCOMP_RET_KILL actions are always logged, when "kill" is in the
actions_logged sysctl, and SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW actions are never logged,
regardless of this flag.

This flag can be used to create noisy filters that result in all
non-allowed actions to be logged. A process may have one noisy filter,
which is loaded with this flag, as well as a quiet filter that's not
loaded with this flag. This allows for the actions in a set of filters
to be selectively conveyed to the admin.

Since a system could have a large number of allocated seccomp_filter
structs, struct packing was taken in consideration. On 64 bit x86, the
new log member takes up one byte of an existing four byte hole in the
struct. On 32 bit x86, the new log member creates a new four byte hole
(unavoidable) and consumes one of those bytes.

Unfortunately, the tests added for SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG are not
capable of inspecting the audit log to verify that the actions taken in
the filter were logged.

With this patch, the logic for deciding if an action will be logged is:

if action == RET_ALLOW:
  do not log
else if action == RET_KILL && RET_KILL in actions_logged:
  log
else if filter-requests-logging && action in actions_logged:
  log
else if audit_enabled && process-is-being-audited:
  log
else:
  do not log

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Userspace needs to be able to reliably detect the support of a filter
flag. A good way of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode,
with the flag bit(s) in question set, and a NULL pointer for the args
parameter of seccomp(2). EFAULT indicates that the flag is valid and
EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid.

This patch adds a selftest that can be used to test this method of
detection in userspace.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Userspace code that needs to check if the kernel supports a given action
may not be able to use the /proc/sys/kernel/seccomp/actions_avail
sysctl. The process may be running in a sandbox and, therefore,
sufficient filesystem access may not be available. This patch adds an
operation to the seccomp(2) syscall that allows userspace code to ask
the kernel if a given action is available.

If the action is supported by the kernel, 0 is returned. If the action
is not supported by the kernel, -1 is returned with errno set to
-EOPNOTSUPP. If this check is attempted on a kernel that doesn't support
this new operation, -1 is returned with errno set to -EINVAL meaning
that userspace code will have the ability to differentiate between the
two error cases.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

This refactors the errno tests (since they all use the same pattern for
their filter) and adds a RET_DATA field ordering test.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>

This attempts to produce a comparison between native getpid() and a
RET_ALLOW-filtered getpid(), to measure the overhead cost of using
seccomp().

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>