linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf, branch v6.0-rc2 Linux kernel source tree selftests/bpf: Ensure sleepable program is rejected by hash map iter 2022-08-10T17:12:48+00:00 Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com 2022-08-10T08:05:38+00:00 c5c0981fd81d35233d625631f13000544c108c53 Add a test to ensure sleepable program is rejected by hash map iterator. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-10-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Add a test to ensure sleepable program is rejected by hash map iterator.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-10-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Add write tests for sk local storage map iterator 2022-08-10T17:12:48+00:00 Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com 2022-08-10T08:05:37+00:00 939a1a946d755c1565e18694e278e9ba7ba19ccc Add test to validate the overwrite of sock local storage map value in map iterator and another one to ensure out-of-bound value writing is rejected. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-9-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Add test to validate the overwrite of sock local storage map value in
map iterator and another one to ensure out-of-bound value writing is
rejected.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-9-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Add tests for reading a dangling map iter fd 2022-08-10T17:12:48+00:00 Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com 2022-08-10T08:05:36+00:00 5836d81e4b039429f409007ba7e0235391537397 After closing both related link fd and map fd, reading the map iterator fd to ensure it is OK to do so. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-8-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
After closing both related link fd and map fd, reading the map
iterator fd to ensure it is OK to do so.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-8-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Add test for prealloc_lru_pop bug 2022-08-10T01:46:11+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2022-08-09T21:30:33+00:00 de7b9927105bd2afe940c6ad22de6938edd8b1c1 Add a regression test to check against invalid check_and_init_map_value call inside prealloc_lru_pop. The kptr should not be reset to NULL once we set it after deleting the map element. Hence, we trigger a program that updates the element causing its reuse, and checks whether the unref kptr is reset or not. If it is, prealloc_lru_pop does an incorrect check_and_init_map_value call and the test fails. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809213033.24147-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Add a regression test to check against invalid check_and_init_map_value
call inside prealloc_lru_pop.

The kptr should not be reset to NULL once we set it after deleting the
map element. Hence, we trigger a program that updates the element
causing its reuse, and checks whether the unref kptr is reset or not.
If it is, prealloc_lru_pop does an incorrect check_and_init_map_value
call and the test fails.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809213033.24147-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf 2022-08-08T13:53:39+00:00 Stanislav Fomichev sdf@google.com 2022-08-04T20:11:40+00:00 ffd5cfca5388e9d7c8386343763df41315ac1dd2 Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it. Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220804201140.1340684-2-sdf@google.com 
Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it. Calling
bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program should return non-zero
btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220804201140.1340684-2-sdf@google.com
selftests/bpf: Bump internal send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint timeout 2022-07-29T18:10:01+00:00 Daniel Müller deso@posteo.net 2022-07-27T18:29:55+00:00 639de43ef0dda165441af400ecb372e16b7f9354 The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727182955.4044988-1-deso@posteo.net 
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least
one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it:
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec
  > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50
  > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec
  > #139/1   send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL

The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict
sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for
within the provided timeout.
Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not
been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking
in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727182955.4044988-1-deso@posteo.net
selftests/bpf: Adjust vmtest.sh to use local kernel configuration 2022-07-27T15:03:14+00:00 Daniel Müller deso@posteo.net 2022-07-27T00:11:56+00:00 40b09653b1977c9630f24c9ca17322d5b38f1ca5 So far the vmtest.sh script, which can be used as a convenient way to run bpf selftests, has obtained the kernel config safe to use for testing from the libbpf/libbpf GitHub repository [0]. Given that we now have included this configuration into this very repository, we can just consume it from here as well, eliminating the necessity of remote accesses. With this change we adjust the logic in the script to use the configuration from below tools/testing/selftests/bpf/configs/ instead of pulling it over the network. [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727001156.3553701-4-deso@posteo.net 
So far the vmtest.sh script, which can be used as a convenient way to
run bpf selftests, has obtained the kernel config safe to use for
testing from the libbpf/libbpf GitHub repository [0].

Given that we now have included this configuration into this very
repository, we can just consume it from here as well, eliminating the
necessity of remote accesses.

With this change we adjust the logic in the script to use the
configuration from below tools/testing/selftests/bpf/configs/ instead
of pulling it over the network.

  [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727001156.3553701-4-deso@posteo.net
selftests/bpf: Copy over libbpf configs 2022-07-27T15:02:38+00:00 Daniel Müller deso@posteo.net 2022-07-27T00:11:55+00:00 cbd620fc18cad51500c46e222328ca60adaa4644 This change integrates libbpf maintained configurations and black/white lists [0] into the repository, co-located with the BPF selftests themselves. We minimize the kernel configurations to keep future updates as small as possible [1]. Furthermore, we make both kernel configurations build on top of the existing configuration tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config (to be concatenated before build). Lastly, we replaced the terms blacklist & whitelist with denylist and allowlist, respectively. [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/tree/20f03302350a4143825cedcbd210c4d7112c1898/travis-ci/vmtest/configs [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220712212124.3180314-1-deso@posteo.net/T/#m30a53648352ed494e556ac003042a9ad0a8f98c6 Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727001156.3553701-3-deso@posteo.net 
This change integrates libbpf maintained configurations and black/white
lists [0] into the repository, co-located with the BPF selftests themselves.
We minimize the kernel configurations to keep future updates as small as
possible [1].

Furthermore, we make both kernel configurations build on top of the existing
configuration tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config (to be concatenated before
build). Lastly, we replaced the terms blacklist & whitelist with denylist and
allowlist, respectively.

  [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/tree/20f03302350a4143825cedcbd210c4d7112c1898/travis-ci/vmtest/configs
  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220712212124.3180314-1-deso@posteo.net/T/#m30a53648352ed494e556ac003042a9ad0a8f98c6

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727001156.3553701-3-deso@posteo.net
selftests/bpf: Sort configuration 2022-07-27T15:02:29+00:00 Daniel Müller deso@posteo.net 2022-07-27T00:11:54+00:00 aee993bbd05cede097885fa74e2627a458d3418a This change makes sure to sort the existing minimal kernel configuration containing options required for running BPF selftests alphabetically. Doing so will make it easier to diff it against other configurations, which in turn helps with maintaining disjunct config files that build on top of each other. It also helped identify the CONFIG_IPV6_GRE being set twice and removes one of the occurrences. Lastly, we change NET_CLS_BPF from 'm' to 'y'. Having this option as 'm' will cause failures of the btf_skc_cls_ingress selftest. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727001156.3553701-2-deso@posteo.net 
This change makes sure to sort the existing minimal kernel configuration
containing options required for running BPF selftests alphabetically.
Doing so will make it easier to diff it against other configurations,
which in turn helps with maintaining disjunct config files that build on
top of each other. It also helped identify the CONFIG_IPV6_GRE being set
twice and removes one of the occurrences.

Lastly, we change NET_CLS_BPF from 'm' to 'y'. Having this option as 'm'
will cause failures of the btf_skc_cls_ingress selftest.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727001156.3553701-2-deso@posteo.net
selftests/bpf: Attach to socketcall() in test_probe_user 2022-07-26T14:29:23+00:00 Ilya Leoshkevich iii@linux.ibm.com 2022-07-26T13:40:08+00:00 d295daf505758f9a0e4d05f4ee3bfdfb4192c18f test_probe_user fails on architectures where libc uses socketcall(SYS_CONNECT) instead of connect(). Fix by attaching to socketcall as well. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220726134008.256968-3-iii@linux.ibm.com 
test_probe_user fails on architectures where libc uses
socketcall(SYS_CONNECT) instead of connect(). Fix by attaching
to socketcall as well.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220726134008.256968-3-iii@linux.ibm.com