<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile, branch v6.6</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Include build flavors for install target</title>
<updated>2023-08-31T20:01:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Björn Töpel</name>
<email>bjorn@rivosinc.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-08-31T16:29:54+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3'/>
<id>be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3</id>
<content type='text'>
When using the "install" or targets depending on install, e.g. "gen_tar",
the BPF machine flavors weren't included.

A command like:
  | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- O=/workspace/kbuild \
  |    HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \
  |    -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar
would not include bpf/no_alu32, bpf/cpuv4, or bpf/bpf-gcc.

Include the BPF machine flavors for "install" make target.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel &lt;bjorn@rivosinc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230831162954.111485-1-bjorn@kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When using the "install" or targets depending on install, e.g. "gen_tar",
the BPF machine flavors weren't included.

A command like:
  | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- O=/workspace/kbuild \
  |    HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \
  |    -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar
would not include bpf/no_alu32, bpf/cpuv4, or bpf/bpf-gcc.

Include the BPF machine flavors for "install" make target.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel &lt;bjorn@rivosinc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230831162954.111485-1-bjorn@kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi test program</title>
<updated>2023-08-21T22:51:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jiri Olsa</name>
<email>jolsa@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-08-09T08:34:34+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=519dfeaf5119e316c1b3301ba2e38eb6d5eb0733'/>
<id>519dfeaf5119e316c1b3301ba2e38eb6d5eb0733</id>
<content type='text'>
Adding uprobe_multi test program that defines 50k uprobe_multi_func_*
functions and will serve as attach point for uprobe_multi bench test
in following patch.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa &lt;jolsa@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-23-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Adding uprobe_multi test program that defines 50k uprobe_multi_func_*
functions and will serve as attach point for uprobe_multi bench test
in following patch.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa &lt;jolsa@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-23-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: selftests: Add defrag selftests</title>
<updated>2023-07-28T23:52:08+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Xu</name>
<email>dxu@dxuuu.xyz</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-21T20:22:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=c313eae739b9a0fc5fbe655cece38eae0a90ec42'/>
<id>c313eae739b9a0fc5fbe655cece38eae0a90ec42</id>
<content type='text'>
These selftests tests 2 major scenarios: the BPF based defragmentation
can successfully be done and that packet pointers are invalidated after
calls to the kfunc. The logic is similar for both ipv4 and ipv6.

In the first scenario, we create a UDP client and UDP echo server. The
the server side is fairly straightforward: we attach the prog and simply
echo back the message.

The on the client side, we send fragmented packets to and expect the
reassembled message back from the server.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu &lt;dxu@dxuuu.xyz&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33e40fdfddf43be93f2cb259303f132f46750953.1689970773.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
These selftests tests 2 major scenarios: the BPF based defragmentation
can successfully be done and that packet pointers are invalidated after
calls to the kfunc. The logic is similar for both ipv4 and ipv6.

In the first scenario, we create a UDP client and UDP echo server. The
the server side is fairly straightforward: we attach the prog and simply
echo back the message.

The on the client side, we send fragmented packets to and expect the
reassembled message back from the server.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu &lt;dxu@dxuuu.xyz&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33e40fdfddf43be93f2cb259303f132f46750953.1689970773.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Enable test test_progs-cpuv4 for gcc build kernel</title>
<updated>2023-07-28T15:54:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yonghong Song</name>
<email>yonghong.song@linux.dev</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-28T05:57:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a76584fc9ff6b32f9839036eb15f4ca4d2586173'/>
<id>a76584fc9ff6b32f9839036eb15f4ca4d2586173</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, test_progs-cpuv4 is generated with clang build kernel
when bpf cpu=v4 is supported by the clang compiler.
Let us enable test_progs-cpuv4 for gcc build kernel as well.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728055745.2285202-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently, test_progs-cpuv4 is generated with clang build kernel
when bpf cpu=v4 is supported by the clang compiler.
Let us enable test_progs-cpuv4 for gcc build kernel as well.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728055745.2285202-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing</title>
<updated>2023-07-28T01:54:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yonghong Song</name>
<email>yonghong.song@linux.dev</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-28T01:12:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a5d0c26a2784890d803fca5e0dd27c590472b43d'/>
<id>a5d0c26a2784890d803fca5e0dd27c590472b43d</id>
<content type='text'>
Similar to no-alu32 runner, if clang compiler supports -mcpu=v4,
a cpuv4 runner is created to test bpf programs compiled with
-mcpu=v4.

The following are some num-of-insn statistics for each newer
instructions based on existing selftests, excluding subsequent
cpuv4 insn specific tests.

   insn pattern                # of instructions
   reg = (s8)reg               4
   reg = (s16)reg              4
   reg = (s32)reg              144
   reg = *(s8 *)(reg + off)    13
   reg = *(s16 *)(reg + off)   14
   reg = *(s32 *)(reg + off)   15215
   reg = bswap16 reg           142
   reg = bswap32 reg           38
   reg = bswap64 reg           14
   reg s/= reg                 0
   reg s%= reg                 0
   gotol &lt;offset&gt;              58

Note that in llvm -mcpu=v4 implementation, the compiler is a little
bit conservative about generating 'gotol' insn (32-bit branch offset)
as it didn't precise count the number of insns (e.g., some insns are
debug insns, etc.). Compared to old 'goto' insn, newer 'gotol' insn
should have comparable verification states to 'goto' insn.

With current patch set, all selftests passed with -mcpu=v4
when running test_progs-cpuv4 binary. The -mcpu=v3 and -mcpu=v2 run
are also successful.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728011250.3718252-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Similar to no-alu32 runner, if clang compiler supports -mcpu=v4,
a cpuv4 runner is created to test bpf programs compiled with
-mcpu=v4.

The following are some num-of-insn statistics for each newer
instructions based on existing selftests, excluding subsequent
cpuv4 insn specific tests.

   insn pattern                # of instructions
   reg = (s8)reg               4
   reg = (s16)reg              4
   reg = (s32)reg              144
   reg = *(s8 *)(reg + off)    13
   reg = *(s16 *)(reg + off)   14
   reg = *(s32 *)(reg + off)   15215
   reg = bswap16 reg           142
   reg = bswap32 reg           38
   reg = bswap64 reg           14
   reg s/= reg                 0
   reg s%= reg                 0
   gotol &lt;offset&gt;              58

Note that in llvm -mcpu=v4 implementation, the compiler is a little
bit conservative about generating 'gotol' insn (32-bit branch offset)
as it didn't precise count the number of insns (e.g., some insns are
debug insns, etc.). Compared to old 'goto' insn, newer 'gotol' insn
should have comparable verification states to 'goto' insn.

With current patch set, all selftests passed with -mcpu=v4
when running test_progs-cpuv4 binary. The -mcpu=v3 and -mcpu=v2 run
are also successful.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728011250.3718252-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for bpf memory allocator</title>
<updated>2023-07-06T01:36:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Hou Tao</name>
<email>houtao1@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-04T02:50:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=fd283ab196a867f8f65f36913e0fadd031fcb823'/>
<id>fd283ab196a867f8f65f36913e0fadd031fcb823</id>
<content type='text'>
The benchmark could be used to compare the performance of hash map
operations and the memory usage between different flavors of bpf memory
allocator (e.g., no bpf ma vs bpf ma vs reuse-after-gp bpf ma). It also
could be used to check the performance improvement or the memory saving
provided by optimization.

The benchmark creates a non-preallocated hash map which uses bpf memory
allocator and shows the operation performance and the memory usage of
the hash map under different use cases:
(1) overwrite
Each CPU overwrites nonoverlapping part of hash map. When each CPU
completes overwriting of 64 elements in hash map, it increases the
op_count.
(2) batch_add_batch_del
Each CPU adds then deletes nonoverlapping part of hash map in batch.
When each CPU adds and deletes 64 elements in hash map, it increases
the op_count twice.
(3) add_del_on_diff_cpu
Each two-CPUs pair adds and deletes nonoverlapping part of map
cooperatively. When each CPU adds or deletes 64 elements in hash map,
it will increase the op_count.

The following is the benchmark results when comparing between different
flavors of bpf memory allocator. These tests are conducted on a KVM guest
with 8 CPUs and 16 GB memory. The command line below is used to do all
the following benchmarks:

  ./bench htab-mem --use-case $name ${OPTS} -w3 -d10 -a -p8

These results show that preallocated hash map has both better performance
and smaller memory footprint.

(1) non-preallocated + no bpf memory allocator (v6.0.19)
use kmalloc() + call_rcu

overwrite            per-prod-op: 11.24 ± 0.07k/s, avg mem: 82.64 ± 26.32MiB, peak mem: 119.18MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op: 18.45 ± 0.10k/s, avg mem: 50.47 ± 14.51MiB, peak mem: 94.96MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op: 14.50 ± 0.03k/s, avg mem: 4.64 ± 0.73MiB, peak mem: 7.20MiB

(2) preallocated
OPTS=--preallocated

overwrite            per-prod-op: 191.42 ± 0.09k/s, avg mem: 1.24 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op: 221.83 ± 0.17k/s, avg mem: 1.23 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op: 39.66 ± 0.31k/s, avg mem: 1.47 ± 0.13MiB, peak mem: 1.75MiB

(3) normal bpf memory allocator

overwrite            per-prod-op: 126.59 ± 0.02k/s, avg mem: 2.26 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op: 83.37 ± 0.20k/s, avg mem: 2.14 ± 0.17MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op: 21.25 ± 0.24k/s, avg mem: 17.50 ± 3.32MiB, peak mem: 28.87MiB

Acked-by: John Fastabend &lt;john.fastabend@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao &lt;houtao1@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230704025039.938914-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The benchmark could be used to compare the performance of hash map
operations and the memory usage between different flavors of bpf memory
allocator (e.g., no bpf ma vs bpf ma vs reuse-after-gp bpf ma). It also
could be used to check the performance improvement or the memory saving
provided by optimization.

The benchmark creates a non-preallocated hash map which uses bpf memory
allocator and shows the operation performance and the memory usage of
the hash map under different use cases:
(1) overwrite
Each CPU overwrites nonoverlapping part of hash map. When each CPU
completes overwriting of 64 elements in hash map, it increases the
op_count.
(2) batch_add_batch_del
Each CPU adds then deletes nonoverlapping part of hash map in batch.
When each CPU adds and deletes 64 elements in hash map, it increases
the op_count twice.
(3) add_del_on_diff_cpu
Each two-CPUs pair adds and deletes nonoverlapping part of map
cooperatively. When each CPU adds or deletes 64 elements in hash map,
it will increase the op_count.

The following is the benchmark results when comparing between different
flavors of bpf memory allocator. These tests are conducted on a KVM guest
with 8 CPUs and 16 GB memory. The command line below is used to do all
the following benchmarks:

  ./bench htab-mem --use-case $name ${OPTS} -w3 -d10 -a -p8

These results show that preallocated hash map has both better performance
and smaller memory footprint.

(1) non-preallocated + no bpf memory allocator (v6.0.19)
use kmalloc() + call_rcu

overwrite            per-prod-op: 11.24 ± 0.07k/s, avg mem: 82.64 ± 26.32MiB, peak mem: 119.18MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op: 18.45 ± 0.10k/s, avg mem: 50.47 ± 14.51MiB, peak mem: 94.96MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op: 14.50 ± 0.03k/s, avg mem: 4.64 ± 0.73MiB, peak mem: 7.20MiB

(2) preallocated
OPTS=--preallocated

overwrite            per-prod-op: 191.42 ± 0.09k/s, avg mem: 1.24 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op: 221.83 ± 0.17k/s, avg mem: 1.23 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op: 39.66 ± 0.31k/s, avg mem: 1.47 ± 0.13MiB, peak mem: 1.75MiB

(3) normal bpf memory allocator

overwrite            per-prod-op: 126.59 ± 0.02k/s, avg mem: 2.26 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
batch_add_batch_del  per-prod-op: 83.37 ± 0.20k/s, avg mem: 2.14 ± 0.17MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu  per-prod-op: 21.25 ± 0.24k/s, avg mem: 17.50 ± 3.32MiB, peak mem: 28.87MiB

Acked-by: John Fastabend &lt;john.fastabend@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao &lt;houtao1@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230704025039.938914-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Honor $(O) when figuring out paths</title>
<updated>2023-07-05T12:34:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Björn Töpel</name>
<email>bjorn@rivosinc.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-05T11:39:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=21be9e477fd2e0b39b5180db6793a1ffeb84d504'/>
<id>21be9e477fd2e0b39b5180db6793a1ffeb84d504</id>
<content type='text'>
When building the kselftests out-of-tree, e.g. ...

  | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- \
  |   O=/tmp/kselftest headers
  | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- \
  |  O=/tmp/kselftest HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= \
  |  SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \
  |  -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar

... the kselftest build would not pick up the correct GENDIR path, and
therefore not including autoconf.h.

Correct that by taking $(O) into consideration when figuring out the
GENDIR path.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel &lt;bjorn@rivosinc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230705113926.751791-3-bjorn@kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When building the kselftests out-of-tree, e.g. ...

  | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- \
  |   O=/tmp/kselftest headers
  | make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- \
  |  O=/tmp/kselftest HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= \
  |  SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \
  |  -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar

... the kselftest build would not pick up the correct GENDIR path, and
therefore not including autoconf.h.

Correct that by taking $(O) into consideration when figuring out the
GENDIR path.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel &lt;bjorn@rivosinc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230705113926.751791-3-bjorn@kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Replace deprecated -target with --target= for Clang</title>
<updated>2023-06-29T13:46:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Fangrui Song</name>
<email>maskray@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-06-24T00:18:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=bbaf1ff06af49e856501024abbe161d96c1f0d66'/>
<id>bbaf1ff06af49e856501024abbe161d96c1f0d66</id>
<content type='text'>
The -target option has been deprecated since clang 3.4 in 2013. Therefore, use
the preferred --target=bpf form instead. This also matches how we use --target=
in scripts/Makefile.clang.

Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song &lt;maskray@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet &lt;quentin@isovalent.com&gt;
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/274b6f0c87a6a1798de0a68135afc7f95def6277
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230624001856.1903733-1-maskray@google.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The -target option has been deprecated since clang 3.4 in 2013. Therefore, use
the preferred --target=bpf form instead. This also matches how we use --target=
in scripts/Makefile.clang.

Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song &lt;maskray@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet &lt;quentin@isovalent.com&gt;
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/274b6f0c87a6a1798de0a68135afc7f95def6277
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230624001856.1903733-1-maskray@google.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next</title>
<updated>2023-05-27T00:26:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-27T00:26:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=75455b906d82424d8704ec3a60127353ff9698b2'/>
<id>75455b906d82424d8704ec3a60127353ff9698b2</id>
<content type='text'>
Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-05-26

We've added 54 non-merge commits during the last 10 day(s) which contain
a total of 76 files changed, 2729 insertions(+), 1003 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Add the capability to destroy sockets in BPF through a new kfunc,
   from Aditi Ghag.

2) Support O_PATH fds in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands,
   from Andrii Nakryiko.

3) Add capability for libbpf to resize datasec maps when backed via mmap,
   from JP Kobryn.

4) Move all the test kfuncs for CI out of the kernel and into bpf_testmod,
   from Jiri Olsa.

5) Big batch of xsk selftest improvements to prep for multi-buffer testing,
   from Magnus Karlsson.

6) Show the target_{obj,btf}_id in tracing link's fdinfo and dump it
   via bpftool, from Yafang Shao.

7) Various misc BPF selftest improvements to work with upcoming LLVM 17,
   from Yonghong Song.

8) Extend bpftool to specify netdevice for resolving XDP hints,
   from Larysa Zaremba.

9) Document masking in shift operations for the insn set document,
   from Dave Thaler.

10) Extend BPF selftests to check xdp_feature support for bond driver,
    from Lorenzo Bianconi.

* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (54 commits)
  bpf: Fix bad unlock balance on freeze_mutex
  libbpf: Ensure FD &gt;= 3 during bpf_map__reuse_fd()
  libbpf: Ensure libbpf always opens files with O_CLOEXEC
  selftests/bpf: Check whether to run selftest
  libbpf: Change var type in datasec resize func
  bpf: drop unnecessary bpf_capable() check in BPF_MAP_FREEZE command
  libbpf: Selftests for resizing datasec maps
  libbpf: Add capability for resizing datasec maps
  selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests
  libbpf: Add opts-based bpf_obj_pin() API and add support for path_fd
  bpf: Support O_PATH FDs in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands
  libbpf: Start v1.3 development cycle
  bpf: Validate BPF object in BPF_OBJ_PIN before calling LSM
  bpftool: Specify XDP Hints ifname when loading program
  selftests/bpf: Add xdp_feature selftest for bond device
  selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy
  selftests/bpf: Add helper to get port using getsockname
  bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc
  bpf: Add kfunc filter function to 'struct btf_kfunc_id_set'
  bpf: udp: Implement batching for sockets iterator
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526222747.17775-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-05-26

We've added 54 non-merge commits during the last 10 day(s) which contain
a total of 76 files changed, 2729 insertions(+), 1003 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Add the capability to destroy sockets in BPF through a new kfunc,
   from Aditi Ghag.

2) Support O_PATH fds in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands,
   from Andrii Nakryiko.

3) Add capability for libbpf to resize datasec maps when backed via mmap,
   from JP Kobryn.

4) Move all the test kfuncs for CI out of the kernel and into bpf_testmod,
   from Jiri Olsa.

5) Big batch of xsk selftest improvements to prep for multi-buffer testing,
   from Magnus Karlsson.

6) Show the target_{obj,btf}_id in tracing link's fdinfo and dump it
   via bpftool, from Yafang Shao.

7) Various misc BPF selftest improvements to work with upcoming LLVM 17,
   from Yonghong Song.

8) Extend bpftool to specify netdevice for resolving XDP hints,
   from Larysa Zaremba.

9) Document masking in shift operations for the insn set document,
   from Dave Thaler.

10) Extend BPF selftests to check xdp_feature support for bond driver,
    from Lorenzo Bianconi.

* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (54 commits)
  bpf: Fix bad unlock balance on freeze_mutex
  libbpf: Ensure FD &gt;= 3 during bpf_map__reuse_fd()
  libbpf: Ensure libbpf always opens files with O_CLOEXEC
  selftests/bpf: Check whether to run selftest
  libbpf: Change var type in datasec resize func
  bpf: drop unnecessary bpf_capable() check in BPF_MAP_FREEZE command
  libbpf: Selftests for resizing datasec maps
  libbpf: Add capability for resizing datasec maps
  selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests
  libbpf: Add opts-based bpf_obj_pin() API and add support for path_fd
  bpf: Support O_PATH FDs in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands
  libbpf: Start v1.3 development cycle
  bpf: Validate BPF object in BPF_OBJ_PIN before calling LSM
  bpftool: Specify XDP Hints ifname when loading program
  selftests/bpf: Add xdp_feature selftest for bond device
  selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy
  selftests/bpf: Add helper to get port using getsockname
  bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc
  bpf: Add kfunc filter function to 'struct btf_kfunc_id_set'
  bpf: udp: Implement batching for sockets iterator
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526222747.17775-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Do not use sign-file as testcase</title>
<updated>2023-05-17T13:43:32+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Alexey Gladkov</name>
<email>legion@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-17T09:49:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=f04a32b2c5b539e3c097cb5c7c1df12a8f4a0cf0'/>
<id>f04a32b2c5b539e3c097cb5c7c1df12a8f4a0cf0</id>
<content type='text'>
The sign-file utility (from scripts/) is used in prog_tests/verify_pkcs7_sig.c,
but the utility should not be called as a test. Executing this utility produces
the following error:

  selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: urandom_read
  ok 16 selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: urandom_read

  selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: sign-file
  not ok 17 selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: sign-file # exit=2

Also, urandom_read is mistakenly used as a test. It does not lead to an error,
but should be moved over to TEST_GEN_FILES as well. The empty TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS
can then be removed.

Fixes: fc97590668ae ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov &lt;legion@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu &lt;roberto.sassu@huawei.com&gt;
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev &lt;sdf@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZEuWFk3QyML9y5QQ@example.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/88e3ab23029d726a2703adcf6af8356f7a2d3483.1684316821.git.legion@kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The sign-file utility (from scripts/) is used in prog_tests/verify_pkcs7_sig.c,
but the utility should not be called as a test. Executing this utility produces
the following error:

  selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: urandom_read
  ok 16 selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: urandom_read

  selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: sign-file
  not ok 17 selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: sign-file # exit=2

Also, urandom_read is mistakenly used as a test. It does not lead to an error,
but should be moved over to TEST_GEN_FILES as well. The empty TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS
can then be removed.

Fixes: fc97590668ae ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov &lt;legion@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu &lt;roberto.sassu@huawei.com&gt;
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev &lt;sdf@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZEuWFk3QyML9y5QQ@example.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/88e3ab23029d726a2703adcf6af8356f7a2d3483.1684316821.git.legion@kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
