linux.git/tools/testing/memblock, branch v6.2-rc2 Linux kernel source tree memblock tests: remove completed TODO item 2022-11-08T07:50:24+00:00 Rebecca Mckeever remckee0@gmail.com 2022-11-07T06:28:09+00:00 80c2fe022ef5d29f3bafee90c37dbcff18cab57a Remove completed item from TODO list. Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f2263abe45613b28f1583fbf04a4bffcf735bcf6.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com 
Remove completed item from TODO list.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f2263abe45613b28f1583fbf04a4bffcf735bcf6.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw 2022-11-08T07:50:24+00:00 Rebecca Mckeever remckee0@gmail.com 2022-11-07T06:28:08+00:00 62bdc99008b372a6c5f81e6d968f3b077a1e3667 Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all but one of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are run for both top-down and bottom-up allocation directions. The tested scenarios are: Range unrestricted: - region cannot be allocated: + there are no previously reserved regions, but requested node is too small + the requested node is fully reserved + the requested node is partially reserved and does not have enough space + none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region Range restricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested without dropping min_addr: + the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent reserved regions - region cannot be allocated: + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the second node is the requested node + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the requested node starts after max_addr + nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the region, but the range is split between two nodes and everything else is reserved Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51b14da46e6591428df3aefc5acc7dca9341a541.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com 
Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all but one of
these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are run for both top-down
and bottom-up allocation directions.

The tested scenarios are:

Range unrestricted:
- region cannot be allocated:
      + there are no previously reserved regions, but requested node is
        too small
      + the requested node is fully reserved
      + the requested node is partially reserved and does not have
        enough space
      + none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region

Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested without
  dropping min_addr:
      + the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent
        reserved regions
- region cannot be allocated:
      + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
        second node is the requested node
      + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
        the requested node starts after max_addr
      + nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the
        region, but the range is split between two nodes and everything
        else is reserved

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51b14da46e6591428df3aefc5acc7dca9341a541.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw 2022-11-08T07:50:24+00:00 Rebecca Mckeever remckee0@gmail.com 2022-11-07T06:28:07+00:00 b6df23edb1ba65b0b46788a872ddc85dfe86ccf5 Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a bottom-up allocation direction. The tested scenarios are: Range unrestricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested: + there are no previously reserved regions + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space Range restricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping min_addr: + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first node is the requested node + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the requested node ends before min_addr + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the requested node ends before min_addr Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/935f0eed5e06fd44dc67d9f49b277923d7896bd3.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com 
Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these
tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a bottom-up
allocation direction.

The tested scenarios are:

Range unrestricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
      + there are no previously reserved regions
      + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space

Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
  min_addr:
      + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
        first node is the requested node
      + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
        requested node ends before min_addr
      + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
        the requested node ends before min_addr

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/935f0eed5e06fd44dc67d9f49b277923d7896bd3.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw 2022-11-08T07:50:24+00:00 Rebecca Mckeever remckee0@gmail.com 2022-11-07T06:28:06+00:00 bfc05a4ce3650a1e5a47ccdaf8c87f814829b4a7 Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a top-down allocation direction. The tested scenarios are: Range unrestricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested: + there are no previously reserved regions + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space Range restricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping min_addr: + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first node is the requested node + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the requested node ends before min_addr + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the requested node ends before min_addr Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2cc0883243d68ddc3faf833d2d9e86f48534c1d7.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com 
Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these
tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a top-down
allocation direction.

The tested scenarios are:

Range unrestricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
      + there are no previously reserved regions
      + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space

Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
  min_addr:
      + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
        first node is the requested node
      + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
        requested node ends before min_addr
      + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
        the requested node ends before min_addr

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2cc0883243d68ddc3faf833d2d9e86f48534c1d7.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
memblock tests: introduce range tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw 2022-11-08T07:50:24+00:00 Rebecca Mckeever remckee0@gmail.com 2022-11-07T06:28:05+00:00 61da03328a603d2d4a5b2e80cbe29bbf0122e6f8 Add TEST_F_EXACT flag, which specifies that tests should run memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). Introduce range tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() by using the TEST_F_EXACT flag to run the range tests in alloc_nid_api.c, since memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() behave the same way when nid = NUMA_NO_NODE. Rename tests and other functions in alloc_nid_api.c by removing "_try". Since the test names will be displayed in verbose output, they need to be general enough to refer to any of the memblock functions that the tests may run. Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a4b6d1b6130ab7375314e1c45a6d5813dfdabbd.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com 
Add TEST_F_EXACT flag, which specifies that tests should run
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). Introduce range tests for
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() by using the TEST_F_EXACT flag to run the
range tests in alloc_nid_api.c, since memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() and
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() behave the same way when nid = NUMA_NO_NODE.

Rename tests and other functions in alloc_nid_api.c by removing "_try".
Since the test names will be displayed in verbose output, they need to
be general enough to refer to any of the memblock functions that the
tests may run.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a4b6d1b6130ab7375314e1c45a6d5813dfdabbd.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com
memblock test: Update TODO list 2022-10-31T08:15:00+00:00 Shaoqin Huang shaoqin.huang@intel.com 2022-10-11T06:21:22+00:00 62a56c540797681a5b50a4c06bf638f79b6013bc Remove the completed items from TODO list. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-4-shaoqin.huang@intel.com 
Remove the completed items from TODO list.

Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-4-shaoqin.huang@intel.com
memblock test: Add test to memblock_reserve() 129th region 2022-10-31T08:15:00+00:00 Shaoqin Huang shaoqin.huang@intel.com 2022-10-11T06:21:21+00:00 5b27dd7968b9c916da4af48d0310f94152744f8e Reserve 129th region in the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region. At the same time, reserve 128 faked memory region, and make sure these reserved region not intersect with the valid memory region. So memblock_double_array() will choose the valid memory region, and it will success. Also need to restore the reserved.regions after memblock_double_array(), to make sure the subsequent tests can run as normal. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-3-shaoqin.huang@intel.com 
Reserve 129th region in the memblock, and this will trigger the
memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So
using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region.
At the same time, reserve 128 faked memory region, and make sure these
reserved region not intersect with the valid memory region. So
memblock_double_array() will choose the valid memory region, and it will
success.

Also need to restore the reserved.regions after memblock_double_array(),
to make sure the subsequent tests can run as normal.

Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-3-shaoqin.huang@intel.com
memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() 129th region 2022-10-31T08:15:00+00:00 Shaoqin Huang shaoqin.huang@intel.com 2022-10-11T06:21:20+00:00 085bdaa6eb1476ec054164bdc4001bc3916ff5cb Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a large enough memory region, and split it into a large enough memory which can be choosed by memblock_double_array(), and the left memory will be split into small memory region, and add them into the memblock. It make sure the memblock_double_array() will always choose the valid memory region that is allocated by the dummy_physical_memory_init(). So memblock_double_array() must success. Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com 
Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the
memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So
using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a large enough memory
region, and split it into a large enough memory which can be choosed by
memblock_double_array(), and the left memory will be split into small
memory region, and add them into the memblock. It make sure the
memblock_double_array() will always choose the valid memory region that
is allocated by the dummy_physical_memory_init().
So memblock_double_array() must success.

Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after
memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a
memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will
affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So
simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test.

Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011062128.49359-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com
Merge tag 'memblock-v6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock 2022-10-12T03:48:55+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-10-12T03:48:55+00:00 49da070062390094112b423ba443ea193527b2e4 Pull memblock updates from Mike Rapoport: "Test suite improvements: - Added verification that memblock allocations zero the allocated memory - Added more test cases for memblock_add(), memblock_remove(), memblock_reserve() and memblock_free() - Added tests for memblock_*_raw() family - Added tests for NUMA-aware allocations in memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()" * tag 'memblock-v6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock: memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid* memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid* memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid* memblock tests: add simulation of physical memory with multiple NUMA nodes memblock_tests: move variable declarations to single block memblock tests: remove 'cleared' from comment blocks memblock tests: add tests for memblock_trim_memory memblock tests: add tests for memblock_*bottom_up functions memblock tests: update alloc_nid_api to test memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw memblock tests: update alloc_api to test memblock_alloc_raw memblock tests: add additional tests for basic api and memblock_alloc memblock tests: add labels to verbose output for generic alloc tests memblock tests: update zeroed memory check for memblock_alloc_* tests memblock tests: update tests to check if memblock_alloc zeroed memory memblock tests: update reference to obsolete build option in comments memblock tests: add command line help option 
Pull memblock updates from Mike Rapoport:
 "Test suite improvements:

   - Added verification that memblock allocations zero the allocated
     memory

   - Added more test cases for memblock_add(), memblock_remove(),
     memblock_reserve() and memblock_free()

   - Added tests for memblock_*_raw() family

   - Added tests for NUMA-aware allocations in memblock_alloc_try_nid()
     and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()"

* tag 'memblock-v6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock:
  memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*
  memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*
  memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*
  memblock tests: add simulation of physical memory with multiple NUMA nodes
  memblock_tests: move variable declarations to single block
  memblock tests: remove 'cleared' from comment blocks
  memblock tests: add tests for memblock_trim_memory
  memblock tests: add tests for memblock_*bottom_up functions
  memblock tests: update alloc_nid_api to test memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw
  memblock tests: update alloc_api to test memblock_alloc_raw
  memblock tests: add additional tests for basic api and memblock_alloc
  memblock tests: add labels to verbose output for generic alloc tests
  memblock tests: update zeroed memory check for memblock_alloc_* tests
  memblock tests: update tests to check if memblock_alloc zeroed memory
  memblock tests: update reference to obsolete build option in comments
  memblock tests: add command line help option
memblock tests: add new pageblock related macro 2022-10-03T21:03:04+00:00 Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com 2022-09-07T08:26:43+00:00 fc5dfebc8055426299739dd1a7828af9638c94fb Add new pageblock_start_pfn() and pageblock_align() macro which are needed by memblock tests. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907082643.186979-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> 
Add new pageblock_start_pfn() and pageblock_align() macro which are needed
by memblock tests.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907082643.186979-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>