linux.git/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c, branch v5.13

perf tests: Add hybrid cases for 'Parse event definition strings' test

2021-04-29T13:31:00+00:00

Add basic hybrid test cases for 'Parse event definition strings' test.

  # perf test 6
   6: Parse event definition strings                                  : Ok

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao 
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Kan Liang 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210427070139.25256-19-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools: Fix various typos in comments

2021-03-23T20:13:43+00:00

Fix ~124 single-word typos and a few spelling errors in the perf tooling code,
accumulated over the years.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321113734.GA248990@gmail.com
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210323160915.GA61903@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf evlist: Use the right prefix for 'struct evlist' event attribute config methods

2020-11-30T18:15:27+00:00

perf_evlist__ is for 'struct perf_evlist' methods, in tools/lib/perf/,
go on completing this split.

Cc: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: Ian Rogers 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools: Add support for exclusive groups/events

2020-10-14T15:24:28+00:00

Peter suggested that using the exclusive mode in perf could avoid some
problems with bad scheduling of groups. Exclusive is implemented in the
kernel, but wasn't exposed by the perf tool, so hard to use without
custom low level API users.

Add support for marking groups or events with :e for exclusive in the
perf tool.  The implementation is basically the same as the existing
pinned attribute.

Committer testing:

  # perf test "parse event"
   6: Parse event definition strings                                  : Ok
  # perf test -v "parse event" |& grep :u*e
  running test 56 'instructions:uep'
  running test 57 '{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:e'
  #
  #
  # grep "model name" -m1 /proc/cpuinfo
  model name	: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
  #
  # perf stat -a -e '{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:e' sleep 1

   Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

             cycles                                                        (0.00%)
             cache-misses                                                  (0.00%)
             branch-misses                                                 (0.00%)

         1.001269893 seconds time elapsed

  Some events weren't counted. Try disabling the NMI watchdog:
  	echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
  	perf stat ...
  	echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
  # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
  # perf stat -a -e '{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:e' sleep 1

   Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

       1,298,663,141      cycles
          30,962,215      cache-misses
           5,325,150      branch-misses

         1.001474934 seconds time elapsed

  #
  # The output for asking for precise events on AMD needs to improve, it
  # supposedly works only for system wide or per CPU
  #
  # perf stat -a -e '{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:uep' sleep 1
  Error:
  The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (cycles).
  /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.

  # perf stat -a -e '{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:ue' sleep 1

   Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

         746,363,126      cycles
          16,881,611      cache-misses
           2,871,259      branch-misses

         1.001636066 seconds time elapsed

  #

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen 
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa 
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201014144255.22699-1-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf parse-events: Set exclude_guest=1 for user-space counting

2020-09-01T15:15:51+00:00

Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.

But it doesn't make sense in most cases that we request for
user-space counting but we also get the guest report.

Of course, we also need to consider 'perf kvm' usage case that
authorized perf users on the host may only want to count guest user
space events. For example,

  # perf kvm --guest record -e cycles:u

When we have 'exclude_guest=1' for 'perf kvm' usage, we may get nothing
from guest events.

To keep perf semantics consistent and clear, this patch sets
exclude_guest=1 for user-space counting but except for 'perf kvm' usage.

Before:

  perf record -e cycles:u ./div
  perf evlist -v
  cycles:u: ..., exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1, ...

After:
  perf record -e cycles:u ./div
  perf evlist -v
  cycles:u: ..., exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1,  exclude_guest: 1, ...

Before:
  perf kvm --guest record -e cycles:u -vvv

perf_event_attr:

  size                             120
  { sample_period, sample_freq }   4000
  sample_type                      IP|TID|TIME|ID|CPU|PERIOD
  read_format                      ID
  disabled                         1
  inherit                          1
  exclude_kernel                   1
  exclude_hv                       1
  freq                             1
  sample_id_all                    1

After:

  perf kvm --guest record -e cycles:u -vvv

perf_event_attr:
  size                             120
  { sample_period, sample_freq }   4000
  sample_type                      IP|TID|TIME|ID|CPU|PERIOD
  read_format                      ID
  disabled                         1
  inherit                          1
  exclude_kernel                   1
  exclude_hv                       1
  freq                             1
  sample_id_all                    1

For Before/After, exclude_guest are both 0 for perf kvm usage.

perf test 6

 6: Parse event definition strings             : Ok

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao 
Tested-by: Like Xu 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Jin Yao 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Kan Liang 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200814012120.16647-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools: Fix term parsing for raw syntax

2020-07-30T10:01:48+00:00

Jin Yao reported issue with possible conflict between raw events and
term values in pmu event syntax.

Currently following syntax is resolved as raw event with 0xead value:

  uncore_imc_free_running/read/

instead of using 'read' term from uncore_imc_free_running pmu, because
'read' is correct raw event syntax with 0xead value.

To solve this issue we do following:

  - check existing terms during rXXXX syntax processing
    and make them priority in case of conflict

  - allow pmu/r0x1234/ syntax to be able to specify conflicting
    raw event (implemented in previous patch)

Also add automated tests for this and perf_pmu__parse_cleanup call to
parse_events_terms, so the test gets properly cleaned up.

Fixes: 3a6c51e4d66c ("perf parser: Add support to specify rXXX event with pmu")
Reported-by: Jin Yao 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Tested-by: Jin Yao 
Acked-by: Ian Rogers 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Michael Petlan 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Richter 
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200726075244.1191481-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools: Allow r0x event syntax

2020-07-30T10:01:48+00:00

Add support to specify raw event with 'r0' syntax within pmu term
syntax like:

  -e cpu/r0xdead/

It will be used to specify raw events in cases where they conflict with
real pmu terms, like 'read', which is valid raw event syntax, but also a
possible pmu term name as reported by Jin Yao.

Reported-by: Jin Yao 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Acked-by: Ian Rogers 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: Michael Petlan 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Richter 
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200725121959.1181869-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel__group_idx() to evsel__group_idx()

2020-05-05T19:35:31+00:00

As it is a 'struct evsel' method, not part of tools/lib/perf/, aka
libperf, to whom the perf_ prefix belongs.

Cc: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel{prev,next}() to evsel{prev,next}()

2020-05-05T19:35:31+00:00

As those are 'struct evsel' methods, not part of tools/lib/perf/, aka
libperf, to whom the perf_ prefix belongs.

Cc: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel__is_() to evsel__is()

2020-05-05T19:35:31+00:00

As those are 'struct evsel' methods, not part of tools/lib/perf/, aka
libperf, to whom the perf_ prefix belongs.

Cc: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

linux.git/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c, branch v5.13

perf tests: Add hybrid cases for 'Parse event definition strings' test

perf tools: Fix various typos in comments

perf evlist: Use the right prefix for 'struct evlist' event attribute config methods

perf tools: Add support for exclusive groups/events

perf parse-events: Set exclude_guest=1 for user-space counting

perf tools: Fix term parsing for raw syntax

perf tools: Allow r0x event syntax

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel__group_idx() to evsel__group_idx()

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel__{prev,next}() to evsel__{prev,next}()

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel__is_*() to evsel__is*()

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel{prev,next}() to evsel{prev,next}()

perf evsel: Rename perf_evsel__is_() to evsel__is()