We have switched to memcg-based memory accouting and thus the rlimit is
not needed any more. LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was introduced in
libbpf for backward compatibility, so we can use it instead now.

libbpf_set_strict_mode always return 0, so we don't need to check whether
the return value is 0 or not.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220409125958.92629-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com

If there is no btf_id or frozen, it will not show the pids, but the pids don't
depend on any one of them.

Below is the result after this change:

  $ ./bpftool map show
  2: lpm_trie  flags 0x1
	key 8B  value 8B  max_entries 1  memlock 4096B
	pids systemd(1)
  3: lpm_trie  flags 0x1
	key 20B  value 8B  max_entries 1  memlock 4096B
	pids systemd(1)

While before this change, the 'pids systemd(1)' can't be displayed.

Fixes: 9330986c0300 ("bpf: Add bloom filter map implementation")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220320060815.7716-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com

If a BPF map is created over 2^32 the memlock value as displayed in JSON
format will be incorrect. Use atoll instead of atoi so that the correct
number is displayed.

  ```
  $ bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/test_bpfmap type hash key 4 \
    value 1024 entries 4194304 name test_bpfmap
  $ bpftool map list
  1: hash  name test_bpfmap  flags 0x0
          key 4B  value 1024B  max_entries 4194304  memlock 4328521728B
  $ sudo bpftool map list -j | jq .[].bytes_memlock
  33554432
  ```

Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <carges@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b6601087-0b11-33cc-904a-1133d1500a10@cloudflare.com

The commit e5043894b21f ("bpftool: Use libbpf_get_error() to check error")
fails to dump map without BTF loaded in pretty mode (-p option).

Fixing this by making sure get_map_kv_btf won't fail in case there's
no BTF available for the map.

Fixes: e5043894b21f ("bpftool: Use libbpf_get_error() to check error")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220216092102.125448-1-jolsa@kernel.org

When reworking btf__get_from_id() in commit a19f93cfafdf the error
handling when calling bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id() changed. Before the rework
if bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id() failed the error would not be propagated to
callers of btf__get_from_id(), after the rework it is. This lead to a
change in behavior in print_key_value() that now prints an error when
trying to lookup keys in maps with no btf available.

Fix this by following the way used in dumping maps to allow to look up
keys in no-btf maps, by which it decides whether and where to get the
btf info according to the btf value type.

Fixes: a19f93cfafdf ("libbpf: Add internal helper to load BTF data by FD")
Signed-off-by: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1644249625-22479-1-git-send-email-yinjun.zhang@corigine.com

hashmap__new() encodes errors with ERR_PTR(), hence it's not valid to
check the returned pointer against NULL and IS_ERR() has to be used
instead.

libbpf_get_error() can't be used in this case as hashmap__new() is not
part of the public libbpf API and it'll continue using ERR_PTR() after
libbpf 1.0.

Fixes: 8f184732b60b ("bpftool: Switch to libbpf's hashmap for pinned paths of BPF objects")
Fixes: 2828d0d75b73 ("bpftool: Switch to libbpf's hashmap for programs/maps in BTF listing")
Fixes: d6699f8e0f83 ("bpftool: Switch to libbpf's hashmap for PIDs/names references")
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@kinvolk.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220107152620.192327-2-mauricio@kinvolk.io

Switch to bpf_map_create() API instead.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201232824.3166325-4-andrii@kernel.org

Currently, LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL mode is enabled by default for
bpftool which means on error cases, some libbpf APIs would
return NULL pointers. This makes IS_ERR check failed to detect
such cases and result in segfault error. Use libbpf_get_error()
instead like we do in libbpf itself.

Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211115012436.3143318-1-hengqi.chen@gmail.com

To support the different BPF map or attach types, bpftool must remain
up-to-date with the types supported by the kernel. Let's update the
lists, by adding the missing Bloom filter map type and the perf_event
attach type.

Both missing items were found with test_bpftool_synctypes.py.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110114632.24537-6-quentin@isovalent.com

In order to show PIDs and names for processes holding references to BPF
programs, maps, links, or BTF objects, bpftool creates hash maps to
store all relevant information. This commit is part of a set that
transitions from the kernel's hash map implementation to the one coming
with libbpf.

The motivation is to make bpftool less dependent of kernel headers, to
ease the path to a potential out-of-tree mirror, like libbpf has.

This is the third and final step of the transition, in which we convert
the hash maps used for storing the information about the processes
holding references to BPF objects (programs, maps, links, BTF), and at
last we drop the inclusion of tools/include/linux/hashtable.h.

Note: Checkpatch complains about the use of __weak declarations, and the
missing empty lines after the bunch of empty function declarations when
compiling without the BPF skeletons (none of these were introduced in
this patch). We want to keep things as they are, and the reports should
be safe to ignore.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023205154.6710-6-quentin@isovalent.com