<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/scripts/package, branch arm64-uaccess</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: buildtar: install riscv compressed images as vmlinuz</title>
<updated>2024-05-09T19:34:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Emil Renner Berthing</name>
<email>emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-05-02T11:16:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a0b49a9102019c790cbe3f102b1f4361342f8c70'/>
<id>a0b49a9102019c790cbe3f102b1f4361342f8c70</id>
<content type='text'>
Use the KBUILD_IMAGE variable to determine the right kernel image to
install and install compressed images to /boot/vmlinuz-$version like the
'make install' target already does.

Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing &lt;emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Use the KBUILD_IMAGE variable to determine the right kernel image to
install and install compressed images to /boot/vmlinuz-$version like the
'make install' target already does.

Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing &lt;emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: buildtar: remove warning for the default case</title>
<updated>2024-05-02T10:48:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-04-22T15:46:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=2b1ab140506822dfc4711be08ea46fb4a83bf1ea'/>
<id>2b1ab140506822dfc4711be08ea46fb4a83bf1ea</id>
<content type='text'>
Given KBUILD_IMAGE properly set in arch/*/Makefile, the default case
should work in most scenarios. The only oddity is the naming of the
copy destination, vmlinux-kbuild-${KERNELRELEASE}. Let's rename it
to vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE} because the kernel is often compressed.
Remove the warning to avoid unnecessary patch submissions when the
default case suffices.

Remove the x86 case, which is now equivalent to the default.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Given KBUILD_IMAGE properly set in arch/*/Makefile, the default case
should work in most scenarios. The only oddity is the naming of the
copy destination, vmlinux-kbuild-${KERNELRELEASE}. Let's rename it
to vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE} because the kernel is often compressed.
Remove the warning to avoid unnecessary patch submissions when the
default case suffices.

Remove the x86 case, which is now equivalent to the default.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: buildtar: add comments about inconsistent package generation</title>
<updated>2024-05-02T10:48:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-04-14T17:41:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=c3f7bed8fa141c02d715f856ba1a6a757b8c8db9'/>
<id>c3f7bed8fa141c02d715f856ba1a6a757b8c8db9</id>
<content type='text'>
scripts/package/buildtar checks some kernel packages, and copies the
first image found. This may potentially produce an inconsistent (and
possibly wrong) package.

For instance, the for-loop for arm64 checks Image.{bz2,gz,lz4,lzma,lzo},
and vmlinuz.efi, then copies the first image found, which might be a
stale image created in a previous build.

When CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT is enabled in the pristine source tree,
'make ARCH=arm64 tar-pkg' will build and copy vmlinuz.efi. This is the
expected behavior.

If you build the kernel with CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT disabled, Image.gz will
be created, which will remain in the tree until you run 'make clean'.
Even if CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT is turned on later, 'make ARCH=arm64 tar-pkg'
will copy stale Image.gz instead of the latest vmlinuz.efi, as Image.gz
takes precedence over vmlinuz.efi.

In summary, the code "[ -f ... ] &amp;&amp; cp" does not consistently produce
the desired outcome.

Other packaging targets are deterministic; deb-pkg and rpm-pkg copies
${KBUILD_IMAGE}, which is determined by CONFIG options.

I removed [ -f ... ] checks from x86, alpha, parisc, and the default
because they have a single kernel image to copy. If it is missing, it
should be an error.

I did not modify the code for mips, arm64, riscv. Instead, I left some
comments. Eventually, someone may fix the code, or at the very least,
it may discourage the copy-pasting of incorrect code to another
architecture.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing &lt;emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;nicolas@fjasle.eu&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
scripts/package/buildtar checks some kernel packages, and copies the
first image found. This may potentially produce an inconsistent (and
possibly wrong) package.

For instance, the for-loop for arm64 checks Image.{bz2,gz,lz4,lzma,lzo},
and vmlinuz.efi, then copies the first image found, which might be a
stale image created in a previous build.

When CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT is enabled in the pristine source tree,
'make ARCH=arm64 tar-pkg' will build and copy vmlinuz.efi. This is the
expected behavior.

If you build the kernel with CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT disabled, Image.gz will
be created, which will remain in the tree until you run 'make clean'.
Even if CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT is turned on later, 'make ARCH=arm64 tar-pkg'
will copy stale Image.gz instead of the latest vmlinuz.efi, as Image.gz
takes precedence over vmlinuz.efi.

In summary, the code "[ -f ... ] &amp;&amp; cp" does not consistently produce
the desired outcome.

Other packaging targets are deterministic; deb-pkg and rpm-pkg copies
${KBUILD_IMAGE}, which is determined by CONFIG options.

I removed [ -f ... ] checks from x86, alpha, parisc, and the default
because they have a single kernel image to copy. If it is missing, it
should be an error.

I did not modify the code for mips, arm64, riscv. Instead, I left some
comments. Eventually, someone may fix the code, or at the very least,
it may discourage the copy-pasting of incorrect code to another
architecture.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing &lt;emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;nicolas@fjasle.eu&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: rpm-pkg: add dtb files in kernel rpm</title>
<updated>2024-03-18T17:30:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez</name>
<email>jtornosm@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-03-11T16:22:38+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=097f1200bf7ea19fb39ccf538a07a153260a7763'/>
<id>097f1200bf7ea19fb39ccf538a07a153260a7763</id>
<content type='text'>
Some architectures, like aarch64 ones, need a dtb file to configure the
hardware. The default dtb file can be preloaded from u-boot, but the final
and/or more complete dtb file needs to be able to be loaded later from
rootfs.

Add the possible dtb files to the kernel rpm and mimic Fedora shipping
process, storing the dtb files in the module directory. These dtb files
will be copied to /boot directory by the install scripts, but add fallback
just in case, checking if the content in /boot directory is correct.

Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
removed when the package is uninstalled.

Tested with Fedora Rawhide (x86_64 and aarch64) with dnf and rpm tools.
In addition, fallback was also tested after modifying the install scripts.

Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez &lt;jtornosm@redhat.com&gt;
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Some architectures, like aarch64 ones, need a dtb file to configure the
hardware. The default dtb file can be preloaded from u-boot, but the final
and/or more complete dtb file needs to be able to be loaded later from
rootfs.

Add the possible dtb files to the kernel rpm and mimic Fedora shipping
process, storing the dtb files in the module directory. These dtb files
will be copied to /boot directory by the install scripts, but add fallback
just in case, checking if the content in /boot directory is correct.

Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
removed when the package is uninstalled.

Tested with Fedora Rawhide (x86_64 and aarch64) with dnf and rpm tools.
In addition, fallback was also tested after modifying the install scripts.

Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez &lt;jtornosm@redhat.com&gt;
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "kbuild/mkspec: clean boot loader configuration on rpm removal"</title>
<updated>2024-02-19T09:20:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-02-02T13:35:20+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=fee9b6d14acde447805d14c0a0a926ced18aa8fa'/>
<id>fee9b6d14acde447805d14c0a0a926ced18aa8fa</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit 6ef41e22a320d95a246d45b673aa7247cc1bbf7b.

If this is still needed, we can bring it back.

However, I'd like to understand why 'new-kernel-pkg --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'new-kernel-pkg --install' was not
called during the installation.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit 6ef41e22a320d95a246d45b673aa7247cc1bbf7b.

If this is still needed, we can bring it back.

However, I'd like to understand why 'new-kernel-pkg --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'new-kernel-pkg --install' was not
called during the installation.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "kbuild/mkspec: support 'update-bootloader'-based systems"</title>
<updated>2024-02-19T09:20:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-02-02T13:35:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=435e86998edf2a2308e7917c6368427f89664c61'/>
<id>435e86998edf2a2308e7917c6368427f89664c61</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit 27c3bffd230abd0a598586aed0fe0ba7b61e0e2e.

If this is still needed, we can bring it back.

However, I'd like to understand why 'update-bootloader --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'update-bootloader --add' was not
called during the installation.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit 27c3bffd230abd0a598586aed0fe0ba7b61e0e2e.

If this is still needed, we can bring it back.

However, I'd like to understand why 'update-bootloader --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'update-bootloader --add' was not
called during the installation.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: rpm-pkg: mark installed files in /boot as %ghost</title>
<updated>2024-02-19T09:20:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-02-02T13:35:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=bca17edb24cb0e9ebc9269a77fc0a15f4b526f65'/>
<id>bca17edb24cb0e9ebc9269a77fc0a15f4b526f65</id>
<content type='text'>
Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
removed when the package is uninstalled.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
removed when the package is uninstalled.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: rpm-pkg: do not include depmod-generated files</title>
<updated>2024-02-19T09:20:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-02-02T13:35:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=615b3a3d2d41bf897168210a092811872561259f'/>
<id>615b3a3d2d41bf897168210a092811872561259f</id>
<content type='text'>
Installing the kernel package is fine, but when uninstalling it, the
following warnings are shown:

  warning: file modules.symbols.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.symbols: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.softdep: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.devname: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.dep.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.dep: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.builtin.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.builtin.alias.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.alias.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.alias: remove failed: No such file or directory

The %preun scriptlet runs 'kernel-install remove', which in turn invokes
/usr/lib/kernel/install.d/50-depmod.install to remove those files before
the actual package removal.

RPM-based distributions do not ship files generated by depmod. Mark them
as %ghost in order to exclude them from the package, but still claim the
ownership on them.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Installing the kernel package is fine, but when uninstalling it, the
following warnings are shown:

  warning: file modules.symbols.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.symbols: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.softdep: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.devname: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.dep.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.dep: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.builtin.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.builtin.alias.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.alias.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
  warning: file modules.alias: remove failed: No such file or directory

The %preun scriptlet runs 'kernel-install remove', which in turn invokes
/usr/lib/kernel/install.d/50-depmod.install to remove those files before
the actual package removal.

RPM-based distributions do not ship files generated by depmod. Mark them
as %ghost in order to exclude them from the package, but still claim the
ownership on them.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: deb-pkg: call more misc debhelper commands</title>
<updated>2024-02-19T09:20:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-01-13T10:43:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=f96beb84eff698aefde7cea2bbf1de4f688c4750'/>
<id>f96beb84eff698aefde7cea2bbf1de4f688c4750</id>
<content type='text'>
Use dh_prep instead of removing old build directories manually.

Use dh_clean instead of removing build directories and debian/files
manually.

Call dh_testdir and dh_testroot for preliminary checks.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;n.schier@avm.de&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Use dh_prep instead of removing old build directories manually.

Use dh_clean instead of removing build directories and debian/files
manually.

Call dh_testdir and dh_testroot for preliminary checks.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;n.schier@avm.de&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kbuild: deb-pkg: build binary-arch in parallel</title>
<updated>2024-02-19T09:20:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-01-13T10:43:38+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=1d7bae8f8c85ddf153f302cd8d2f33d34762b0fd'/>
<id>1d7bae8f8c85ddf153f302cd8d2f33d34762b0fd</id>
<content type='text'>
'make deb-pkg' builds build-arch in parallel, but binary-arch serially.

Given that all binary packages are independent of one another, they can
be built in parallel.

I am uncertain whether debian/files is robust against a race condition.
Just in case, make dh_gencontrol (dpkg-gencontrol) output to separate
debian/*.files, which are then concatenated into debian/files.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;n.schier@avm.de&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
'make deb-pkg' builds build-arch in parallel, but binary-arch serially.

Given that all binary packages are independent of one another, they can
be built in parallel.

I am uncertain whether debian/files is robust against a race condition.
Just in case, make dh_gencontrol (dpkg-gencontrol) output to separate
debian/*.files, which are then concatenated into debian/files.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;n.schier@avm.de&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
