<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/net/sctp/command.c, branch v2.6.25</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>[SCTP]: Stop claiming that this is a "reference implementation"</title>
<updated>2008-02-05T15:59:07+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Vlad Yasevich</name>
<email>vladislav.yasevich@hp.com</email>
</author>
<published>2008-01-11T14:57:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=60c778b25972e095df8981dd41e99d161e8738f9'/>
<id>60c778b25972e095df8981dd41e99d161e8738f9</id>
<content type='text'>
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be
"the reference implementation".  First of all, "the
refrence implementation" was the original implementation
of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others.
Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation',
we don't really meet the requirements.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich &lt;vladislav.yasevich@hp.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be
"the reference implementation".  First of all, "the
refrence implementation" was the original implementation
of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others.
Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation',
we don't really meet the requirements.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich &lt;vladislav.yasevich@hp.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Linux-2.6.12-rc2</title>
<updated>2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org</email>
</author>
<published>2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2'/>
<id>1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2</id>
<content type='text'>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
