linux.git/net/rxrpc, branch v4.11

rxrpc: Ignore BUSY packets on old calls

2017-03-17T04:27:57+00:00

If we receive a BUSY packet for a call we think we've just completed, the
packet is handed off to the connection processor to deal with - but the
connection processor doesn't expect a BUSY packet and so flags a protocol
error.

Fix this by simply ignoring the BUSY packet for the moment.

The symptom of this may appear as a system call failing with EPROTO.  This
may be triggered by pressing ctrl-C under some circumstances.

This comes about we abort calls due to interruption by a signal (which we
shouldn't do, but that's going to be a large fix and mostly in fs/afs/).
What happens is that we abort the call and may also abort follow up calls
too (this needs offloading somehoe).  So we see a transmission of something
like the following sequence of packets:

	DATA for call N
	ABORT call N
	DATA for call N+1
	ABORT call N+1

in very quick succession on the same channel.  However, the peer may have
deferred the processing of the ABORT from the call N to a background thread
and thus sees the DATA message from the call N+1 coming in before it has
cleared the channel.  Thus it sends a BUSY packet[*].

[*] Note that some implementations (OpenAFS, for example) mark the BUSY
    packet with one plus the callNumber of the call prior to call N.
    Ordinarily, this would be call N, but there's no requirement for the
    calls on a channel to be numbered strictly sequentially (the number is
    required to increase).

    This is wrong and means that the callNumber in the BUSY packet should
    be ignored (it really ought to be N+1 since that's what it's in
    response to).

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Wake up the transmitter if Rx window size increases on the peer

2017-03-10T17:34:23+00:00

The RxRPC ACK packet may contain an extension that includes the peer's
current Rx window size for this call.  We adjust the local Tx window size
to match.  However, the transmitter can stall if the receive window is
reduced to 0 by the peer and then reopened.

This is because the normal way that the transmitter is re-energised is by
dropping something out of our Tx queue and thus making space.  When a
single gap is made, the transmitter is woken up.  However, because there's
nothing in the Tx queue at this point, this doesn't happen.

To fix this, perform a wake_up() any time we see the peer's Rx window size
increasing.

The observable symptom is that calls start failing on ETIMEDOUT and the
following:

	kAFS: SERVER DEAD state=-62

appears in dmesg.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: rxrpc_kernel_send_data() needs to handle failed call better

2017-03-10T02:30:10+00:00

If rxrpc_kernel_send_data() is asked to send data through a call that has
already failed (due to a remote abort, received protocol error or network
error), then return the associated error code saved in the call rather than
ESHUTDOWN.

This allows the caller to work out whether to ask for the abort code or not
based on this.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Call state should be read with READ_ONCE() under some circumstances

2017-03-07T21:59:06+00:00

The call state may be changed at any time by the data-ready routine in
response to received packets, so if the call state is to be read and acted
upon several times in a function, READ_ONCE() must be used unless the call
state lock is held.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net

2017-03-05T01:31:39+00:00

Pull networking fixes from David Miller:

 1) Fix double-free in batman-adv, from Sven Eckelmann.

 2) Fix packet stats for fast-RX path, from Joannes Berg.

 3) Netfilter's ip_route_me_harder() doesn't handle request sockets
    properly, fix from Florian Westphal.

 4) Fix sendmsg deadlock in rxrpc, from David Howells.

 5) Add missing RCU locking to transport hashtable scan, from Xin Long.

 6) Fix potential packet loss in mlxsw driver, from Ido Schimmel.

 7) Fix race in NAPI handling between poll handlers and busy polling,
    from Eric Dumazet.

 8) TX path in vxlan and geneve need proper RCU locking, from Jakub
    Kicinski.

 9) SYN processing in DCCP and TCP need to disable BH, from Eric
    Dumazet.

10) Properly handle net_enable_timestamp() being invoked from IRQ
    context, also from Eric Dumazet.

11) Fix crash on device-tree systems in xgene driver, from Alban Bedel.

12) Do not call sk_free() on a locked socket, from Arnaldo Carvalho de
    Melo.

13) Fix use-after-free in netvsc driver, from Dexuan Cui.

14) Fix max MTU setting in bonding driver, from WANG Cong.

15) xen-netback hash table can be allocated from softirq context, so use
    GFP_ATOMIC. From Anoob Soman.

16) Fix MAC address change bug in bgmac driver, from Hari Vyas.

17) strparser needs to destroy strp_wq on module exit, from WANG Cong.

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (69 commits)
  strparser: destroy workqueue on module exit
  sfc: fix IPID endianness in TSOv2
  sfc: avoid max() in array size
  rds: remove unnecessary returned value check
  rxrpc: Fix potential NULL-pointer exception
  nfp: correct DMA direction in XDP DMA sync
  nfp: don't tell FW about the reserved buffer space
  net: ethernet: bgmac: mac address change bug
  net: ethernet: bgmac: init sequence bug
  xen-netback: don't vfree() queues under spinlock
  xen-netback: keep a local pointer for vif in backend_disconnect()
  netfilter: nf_tables: don't call nfnetlink_set_err() if nfnetlink_send() fails
  netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: incorrect assumption on lower interval lookups
  netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix wrong memory initialisation
  can: flexcan: fix typo in comment
  can: usb_8dev: Fix memory leak of priv->cmd_msg_buffer
  can: gs_usb: fix coding style
  can: gs_usb: Don't use stack memory for USB transfers
  ixgbe: Limit use of 2K buffers on architectures with 256B or larger cache lines
  ixgbe: update the rss key on h/w, when ethtool ask for it
  ...

rxrpc: Fix potential NULL-pointer exception

2017-03-03T17:48:00+00:00

Fix a potential NULL-pointer exception in rxrpc_do_sendmsg().  The call
state check that I added should have gone into the else-body of the
if-statement where we actually have a call to check.

Found by CoverityScan CID#1414316 ("Dereference after null check").

Fixes: 540b1c48c37a ("rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg")
Reported-by: Colin Ian King 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

sched/headers: Prepare to move signal wakeup & sigpending methods from into

2017-03-02T07:42:32+00:00

Fix up affected files that include this signal functionality via sched.h.

Acked-by: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Mike Galbraith 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg

2017-03-01T17:50:58+00:00

All the routines by which rxrpc is accessed from the outside are serialised
by means of the socket lock (sendmsg, recvmsg, bind,
rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(), ...) and this presents a problem:

 (1) If a number of calls on the same socket are in the process of
     connection to the same peer, a maximum of four concurrent live calls
     are permitted before further calls need to wait for a slot.

 (2) If a call is waiting for a slot, it is deep inside sendmsg() or
     rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() and the entry function is holding the socket
     lock.

 (3) sendmsg() and recvmsg() or the in-kernel equivalents are prevented
     from servicing the other calls as they need to take the socket lock to
     do so.

 (4) The socket is stuck until a call is aborted and makes its slot
     available to the waiter.

Fix this by:

 (1) Provide each call with a mutex ('user_mutex') that arbitrates access
     by the users of rxrpc separately for each specific call.

 (2) Make rxrpc_sendmsg() and rxrpc_recvmsg() unlock the socket as soon as
     they've got a call and taken its mutex.

     Note that I'm returning EWOULDBLOCK from recvmsg() if MSG_DONTWAIT is
     set but someone else has the lock.  Should I instead only return
     EWOULDBLOCK if there's nothing currently to be done on a socket, and
     sleep in this particular instance because there is something to be
     done, but we appear to be blocked by the interrupt handler doing its
     ping?

 (3) Make rxrpc_new_client_call() unlock the socket after allocating a new
     call, locking its user mutex and adding it to the socket's call tree.
     The call is returned locked so that sendmsg() can add data to it
     immediately.

     From the moment the call is in the socket tree, it is subject to
     access by sendmsg() and recvmsg() - even if it isn't connected yet.

 (4) Lock new service calls in the UDP data_ready handler (in
     rxrpc_new_incoming_call()) because they may already be in the socket's
     tree and the data_ready handler makes them live immediately if a user
     ID has already been preassigned.

     Note that the new call is locked before any notifications are sent
     that it is live, so doing mutex_trylock() *ought* to always succeed.
     Userspace is prevented from doing sendmsg() on calls that are in a
     too-early state in rxrpc_do_sendmsg().

 (5) Make rxrpc_new_incoming_call() return the call with the user mutex
     held so that a ping can be scheduled immediately under it.

     Note that it might be worth moving the ping call into
     rxrpc_new_incoming_call() and then we can drop the mutex there.

 (6) Make rxrpc_accept_call() take the lock on the call it is accepting and
     release the socket after adding the call to the socket's tree.  This
     is slightly tricky as we've dequeued the call by that point and have
     to requeue it.

     Note that requeuing emits a trace event.

 (7) Make rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() take the
     new mutex immediately and don't bother with the socket mutex at all.

This patch has the nice bonus that calls on the same socket are now to some
extent parallelisable.

Note that we might want to move rxrpc_service_prealloc() calls out from the
socket lock and give it its own lock, so that we don't hang progress in
other calls because we're waiting for the allocator.

We probably also want to avoid calling rxrpc_notify_socket() from within
the socket lock (rxrpc_accept_call()).

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Tested-by: Marc Dionne 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Kernel calls get stuck in recvmsg

2017-02-27T02:30:12+00:00

Calls made through the in-kernel interface can end up getting stuck because
of a missed variable update in a loop in rxrpc_recvmsg_data().  The problem
is like this:

 (1) A new packet comes in and doesn't cause a notification to be given to
     the client as there's still another packet in the ring - the
     assumption being that if the client will keep drawing off data until
     the ring is empty.

 (2) The client is in rxrpc_recvmsg_data(), inside the big while loop that
     iterates through the packets.  This copies the window pointers into
     variables rather than using the information in the call struct
     because:

     (a) MSG_PEEK might be in effect;

     (b) we need a barrier after reading call->rx_top to pair with the
     	 barrier in the softirq routine that loads the buffer.

 (3) The reading of call->rx_top is done outside of the loop, and top is
     never updated whilst we're in the loop.  This means that even through
     there's a new packet available, we don't see it and may return -EFAULT
     to the caller - who will happily return to the scheduler and await the
     next notification.

 (4) No further notifications are forthcoming until there's an abort as the
     ring isn't empty.

The fix is to move the read of call->rx_top inside the loop - but it needs
to be done before the condition is checked.

Reported-by: Marc Dionne 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Tested-by: Marc Dionne 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix an assertion in rxrpc_read()

2017-02-24T16:42:55+00:00

In the rxrpc_read() function, which allows a user to read the contents of a
key, we miscalculate the expected length of an encoded rxkad token by not
taking into account the key length.  However, the data is stored later
anyway with an ENCODE_DATA() call - and an assertion failure then ensues
when the lengths are checked at the end.

Fix this by including the key length in the token size estimation.

The following assertion is produced:

Assertion failed - 384(0x180) == 380(0x17c) is false
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at ../net/rxrpc/key.c:1221!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 2 PID: 2957 Comm: keyctl Not tainted 4.10.0-fscache+ #483
Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014
task: ffff8804013a8500 task.stack: ffff8804013ac000
RIP: 0010:rxrpc_read+0x10de/0x11b6
RSP: 0018:ffff8804013afe48 EFLAGS: 00010296
RAX: 000000000000003b RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000040001 RSI: 00000000000000f6 RDI: 0000000000000300
RBP: ffff8804013afed8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffff8804013afd90 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00005575f7c911b4
R13: 00005575f7c911b3 R14: 0000000000000157 R15: ffff880408a5d640
FS:  00007f8dfbc73700(0000) GS:ffff88041fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00005575f7c91008 CR3: 000000040120a000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
Call Trace:
 keyctl_read_key+0xb6/0xd7
 SyS_keyctl+0x83/0xe7
 do_syscall_64+0x80/0x191
 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller