Change rxrpc_queue_packet()'s signature so that it can return any error
code it may encounter when trying to send the packet.

This allows the caller to eventually do something in case of error - though
it should be noted that the packet has been queued and a resend is
scheduled.

Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The changes introduced to allow rxrpc calls to be retried creates an issue
when it comes to refcounting afs_call structs.  The problem is that when
rxrpc_send_data() queues the last packet for an asynchronous call, the
following sequence can occur:

 (1) The notify_end_tx callback is invoked which causes the state in the
     afs_call to be changed from AFS_CALL_CL_REQUESTING or
     AFS_CALL_SV_REPLYING.

 (2) afs_deliver_to_call() can then process event notifications from rxrpc
     on the async_work queue.

 (3) Delivery of events, such as an abort from the server, can cause the
     afs_call state to be changed to AFS_CALL_COMPLETE on async_work.

 (4) For an asynchronous call, afs_process_async_call() notes that the call
     is complete and tried to clean up all the refs on async_work.

 (5) rxrpc_send_data() might return the amount of data transferred
     (success) or an error - which could in turn reflect a local error or a
     received error.

Synchronising the clean up after rxrpc_kernel_send_data() returns an error
with the asynchronous cleanup is then tricky to get right.

Mostly revert commit c038a58ccfd6704d4d7d60ed3d6a0fca13cf13a4.  The two API
functions the original commit added aren't currently used.  This makes
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() always return successfully if it queued the data
it was given.

Note that this doesn't affect synchronous calls since their Rx notification
function merely pokes a wait queue and does not refcounting.  The
asynchronous call notification function *has* to do refcounting and pass a
ref over the work item to avoid the need to sync the workqueue in call
cleanup.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The expect_rx_by call timeout is supposed to be set when a call is started
to indicate that we need to receive a packet by that point.  This is
currently put back every time we receive a packet, but it isn't started
when we first send a packet.  Without this, the call may wait forever if
the server doesn't deign to reply.

Fix this by setting the timeout upon a successful UDP sendmsg call for the
first DATA packet.  The timeout is initiated only for initial transmission
and not for subsequent retries as we don't want the retry mechanism to
extend the timeout indefinitely.

Fixes: a158bdd3247b ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

When a new client call is requested, an rxrpc_conn_parameters struct object
is passed in with a bunch of parameters set, such as the local endpoint to
use.  A pointer to the target peer record is also placed in there by
rxrpc_get_client_conn() - and this is removed if and only if a new
connection object is allocated.  Thus it leaks if a new connection object
isn't allocated.

Fix this by putting any peer object attached to the rxrpc_conn_parameters
object in the function that allocated it.

Fixes: 19ffa01c9c45 ("rxrpc: Use structs to hold connection params and protocol info")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Fix various issues detected by checker.

Errors:

 (*) rxrpc_discard_prealloc() should be using rcu_assign_pointer to set
     call->socket.

Warnings:

 (*) rxrpc_service_connection_reaper() should be passing NULL rather than 0 to
     trace_rxrpc_conn() as the where argument.

 (*) rxrpc_disconnect_client_call() should get its net pointer via the
     call->conn rather than call->sock to avoid a warning about accessing
     an RCU pointer without protection.

 (*) Proc seq start/stop functions need annotation as they pass locks
     between the functions.

False positives:

 (*) Checker doesn't correctly handle of seq-retry lock context balance in
     rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu().

 (*) Checker thinks execution may proceed past the BUG() in
     rxrpc_publish_service_conn().

 (*) Variable length array warnings from SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK() in
     rxkad.c.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc calls have a ring of packets that are awaiting ACK or retransmission
and a parallel ring of annotations that tracks the state of those packets.
If the initial transmission of a packet on the underlying UDP socket fails
then the packet annotation is marked for resend - but the setting of this
mark accidentally erases the last-packet mark also stored in the same
annotation slot.  If this happens, a call won't switch out of the Tx phase
when all the packets have been transmitted.

Fix this by retaining the last-packet mark and only altering the packet
state.

Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

In rxrpc and afs, use the debug_ids that are monotonically allocated to
various objects as they're allocated rather than pointers as kernel
pointers are now hashed making them less useful.  Further, the debug ids
aren't reused anywhere nearly as quickly.

In addition, allow kernel services that use rxrpc, such as afs, to take
numbers from the rxrpc counter, assign them to their own call struct and
pass them in to rxrpc for both client and service calls so that the trace
lines for each will have the same ID tag.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Values assigned to both variable resend_at and ack_at are overwritten
before they can be used.

The correct fix here is to add 'now' to the previously computed value in
resend_at and ack_at.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462262
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462263
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462264
Fixes: beb8e5e4f38c ("rxrpc: Express protocol timeouts in terms of RTT")
Link: https://marc.info/?i=17004.1511808959%40warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that
has the request-ack flag set.  This allows us to detect if we don't get an
ACK in response to the latest flagged packet.

The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within
2*RTT of the transmission.

If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out
the state of the other side.  If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner,
we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that
instead.

If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what
we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA
packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have
been lost and retransmit immediately.

Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and
speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set.  It should result in
either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the
a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Express protocol timeouts for data retransmission and deferred ack
generation in terms on RTT rather than specified timeouts once we have
sufficient RTT samples.

For the moment, this requires just one RTT sample to be able to use this
for ack deferral and two for data retransmission.

The data retransmission timeout is set at RTT*1.5 and the ACK deferral
timeout is set at RTT.

Note that the calculated timeout is limited to a minimum of 4ns to make
sure it doesn't happen too quickly.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>