linux.git/net/rose, branch v5.19

net: rose: fix UAF bug caused by rose_t0timer_expiry

2022-07-07T02:49:11+00:00

There are UAF bugs caused by rose_t0timer_expiry(). The
root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer
handler that is running and there is no synchronization.
One of the race conditions is shown below:

    (thread 1)             |        (thread 2)
                           | rose_device_event
                           |   rose_rt_device_down
                           |     rose_remove_neigh
rose_t0timer_expiry        |       rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh)
  ...                      |         del_timer(&neigh->t0timer)
                           |         kfree(rose_neigh) //[1]FREE
  neigh->dce_mode //[2]USE |

The rose_neigh is deallocated in position [1] and use in
position [2].

The crash trace triggered by POC is like below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in expire_timers+0x144/0x320
Write of size 8 at addr ffff888009b19658 by task swapper/0/0
...
Call Trace:
 
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 ...

This patch changes rose_stop_ftimer() and rose_stop_t0timer()
in rose_remove_neigh() to del_timer_sync() in order that the
timer handler could be finished before the resources such as
rose_neigh and so on are deallocated. As a result, the UAF
bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705125610.77971-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

net: rose: fix UAF bugs caused by timer handler

2022-06-30T09:07:30+00:00

There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry()
and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer()
could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount
of sock is not managed properly.

One of the UAF bugs is shown below:

    (thread 1)          |        (thread 2)
                        |  rose_bind
                        |  rose_connect
                        |    rose_start_heartbeat
rose_release            |    (wait a time)
  case ROSE_STATE_0     |
  rose_destroy_socket   |  rose_heartbeat_expiry
    rose_stop_heartbeat |
    sock_put(sk)        |    ...
  sock_put(sk) // FREE  |
                        |    bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE

The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and
then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry().

Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(),
it could not stop the timer that is running.

The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0
...
Call Trace:
 
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0
 
 
 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202
RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46
R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000
...
Allocated by task 146:
 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0
 sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0
 sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0
 rose_create+0x7b/0x330
 __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640
 __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270
 __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80
 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Freed by task 152:
 kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70
 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40
 ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190
 kfree+0xd3/0x270
 __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460
 rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0
 sock_close+0xcb/0x230
 __fput+0x2d9/0x650
 task_work_run+0xd6/0x160
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions
such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer,
and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished
or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat()
and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou 
Tested-by: Duoming Zhou 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni

ROSE: Remove unused code and clean up some inconsistent indenting

2022-05-10T00:19:27+00:00

Eliminate the follow smatch warning:

net/rose/rose_route.c:1136 rose_node_show() warn: inconsistent
indenting.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot 
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220507034207.18651-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

net: remove noblock parameter from skb_recv_datagram()

2022-04-06T12:45:26+00:00

skb_recv_datagram() has two parameters 'flags' and 'noblock' that are
merged inside skb_recv_datagram() by 'flags | (noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0)'

As 'flags' may contain MSG_DONTWAIT as value most callers split the 'flags'
into 'flags' and 'noblock' with finally obsolete bit operations like this:

skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &rc);

And this is not even done consistently with the 'flags' parameter.

This patch removes the obsolete and costly splitting into two parameters
and only performs bit operations when really needed on the caller side.

One missing conversion thankfully reported by kernel test robot. I missed
to enable kunit tests to build the mctp code.

Reported-by: kernel test robot 
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Don't include filter.h from net/sock.h

2021-12-29T16:48:14+00:00

sock.h is pretty heavily used (5k objects rebuilt on x86 after
it's touched). We can drop the include of filter.h from it and
add a forward declaration of struct sk_filter instead.
This decreases the number of rebuilt objects when bpf.h
is touched from ~5k to ~1k.

There's a lot of missing includes this was masking. Primarily
in networking tho, this time.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde 
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli 
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov 
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211229004913.513372-1-kuba@kernel.org

rose: constify dev_addr passing

2021-10-13T16:40:45+00:00

In preparation for netdev->dev_addr being constant
make all relevant arguments in rose constant.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

ax25: constify dev_addr passing

2021-10-13T16:40:45+00:00

In preparation for netdev->dev_addr being constant
make all relevant arguments in AX25 constant.

Modify callers as well (netrom, rose).

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

net: use dev_addr_set()

2021-10-09T10:55:01+00:00

Use dev_addr_set() instead of writing directly to netdev->dev_addr
in various misc and old drivers.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: rose: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2021-03-10T20:45:15+00:00

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
letting the code fall through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()

2020-11-20T18:04:58+00:00

rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh->dev` when called from
rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`,
and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL.
i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer()
its `->dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling
rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL.

- net/rose/rose_link.c
This bug seems to get triggered in this line:

rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr;

Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh->dev`
in rose_loopback_timer().

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3
Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191043.28813-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski