linux.git/net/can, branch v6.6 Linux kernel source tree can: isotp: isotp_sendmsg(): fix TX state detection and wait behavior 2023-10-06T10:54:33+00:00 Lukas Magel lukas.magel@posteo.net 2023-08-27T09:22:05+00:00 d9c2ba65e651467de739324d978b04ed8729f483 With patch [1], isotp_poll was updated to also queue the poller in the so->wait queue, which is used for send state changes. Since the queue now also contains polling tasks that are not interested in sending, the queue fill state can no longer be used as an indication of send readiness. As a consequence, nonblocking writes can lead to a race and lock-up of the socket if there is a second task polling the socket in parallel. With this patch, isotp_sendmsg does not consult wq_has_sleepers but instead tries to atomically set so->tx.state and waits on so->wait if it is unable to do so. This behavior is in alignment with isotp_poll, which also checks so->tx.state to determine send readiness. V2: - Revert direct exit to goto err_event_drop [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331125511.372783-1-michal.sojka@cvut.cz Reported-by: Maxime Jayat <maxime.jayat@mobile-devices.fr> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/11328958-453f-447f-9af8-3b5824dfb041@munic.io/ Signed-off-by: Lukas Magel <lukas.magel@posteo.net> Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Fixes: 79e19fa79cb5 ("can: isotp: isotp_ops: fix poll() to not report false EPOLLOUT events") Link: https://github.com/pylessard/python-udsoncan/issues/178#issuecomment-1743786590 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230827092205.7908-1-lukas.magel@posteo.net Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> 
With patch [1], isotp_poll was updated to also queue the poller in the
so->wait queue, which is used for send state changes. Since the queue
now also contains polling tasks that are not interested in sending, the
queue fill state can no longer be used as an indication of send
readiness. As a consequence, nonblocking writes can lead to a race and
lock-up of the socket if there is a second task polling the socket in
parallel.

With this patch, isotp_sendmsg does not consult wq_has_sleepers but
instead tries to atomically set so->tx.state and waits on so->wait if it
is unable to do so. This behavior is in alignment with isotp_poll, which
also checks so->tx.state to determine send readiness.

V2:
- Revert direct exit to goto err_event_drop

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331125511.372783-1-michal.sojka@cvut.cz

Reported-by: Maxime Jayat <maxime.jayat@mobile-devices.fr>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/11328958-453f-447f-9af8-3b5824dfb041@munic.io/
Signed-off-by: Lukas Magel <lukas.magel@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Fixes: 79e19fa79cb5 ("can: isotp: isotp_ops: fix poll() to not report false EPOLLOUT events")
Link: https://github.com/pylessard/python-udsoncan/issues/178#issuecomment-1743786590
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230827092205.7908-1-lukas.magel@posteo.net
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_tsflags 2023-09-01T06:27:33+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2023-08-31T13:52:11+00:00 e3390b30a5dfb112e8e802a59c0f68f947b638b2 sk->sk_tsflags can be read locklessly, add corresponding annotations. Fixes: b9f40e21ef42 ("net-timestamp: move timestamp flags out of sk_flags") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
sk->sk_tsflags can be read locklessly, add corresponding annotations.

Fixes: b9f40e21ef42 ("net-timestamp: move timestamp flags out of sk_flags")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
can: raw: add missing refcount for memory leak fix 2023-08-23T00:18:50+00:00 Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net 2023-08-21T14:45:47+00:00 c275a176e4b69868576e543409927ae75e3a3288 Commit ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") introduced a new reference to the CAN netdevice that has assigned CAN filters. But this new ro->dev reference did not maintain its own refcount which lead to another KASAN use-after-free splat found by Eric Dumazet. This patch ensures a proper refcount for the CAN nedevice. Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821144547.6658-3-socketcan@hartkopp.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
Commit ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") introduced
a new reference to the CAN netdevice that has assigned CAN filters.
But this new ro->dev reference did not maintain its own refcount which
lead to another KASAN use-after-free splat found by Eric Dumazet.

This patch ensures a proper refcount for the CAN nedevice.

Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821144547.6658-3-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
can: isotp: fix support for transmission of SF without flow control 2023-08-23T00:18:50+00:00 Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net 2023-08-21T14:45:46+00:00 0bfe71159230bab79ee230225ae12ffecbb69f3e The original implementation had a very simple handling for single frame transmissions as it just sent the single frame without a timeout handling. With the new echo frame handling the echo frame was also introduced for single frames but the former exception ('simple without timers') has been maintained by accident. This leads to a 1 second timeout when closing the socket and to an -ECOMM error when CAN_ISOTP_WAIT_TX_DONE is selected. As the echo handling is always active (also for single frames) remove the wrong extra condition for single frames. Fixes: 9f39d36530e5 ("can: isotp: add support for transmission without flow control") Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821144547.6658-2-socketcan@hartkopp.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
The original implementation had a very simple handling for single frame
transmissions as it just sent the single frame without a timeout handling.

With the new echo frame handling the echo frame was also introduced for
single frames but the former exception ('simple without timers') has been
maintained by accident. This leads to a 1 second timeout when closing the
socket and to an -ECOMM error when CAN_ISOTP_WAIT_TX_DONE is selected.

As the echo handling is always active (also for single frames) remove the
wrong extra condition for single frames.

Fixes: 9f39d36530e5 ("can: isotp: add support for transmission without flow control")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821144547.6658-2-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark 2023-07-29T17:13:41+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2023-07-28T15:03:15+00:00 3c5b4d69c358a9275a8de98f87caf6eda644b086 sk->sk_mark is often read while another thread could change the value. Fixes: 4a19ec5800fc ("[NET]: Introducing socket mark socket option.") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
sk->sk_mark is often read while another thread could change the value.

Fixes: 4a19ec5800fc ("[NET]: Introducing socket mark socket option.")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
can: raw: fix lockdep issue in raw_release() 2023-07-20T11:46:29+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2023-07-20T11:44:38+00:00 11c9027c983e9e4b408ee5613b6504d24ebd85be syzbot complained about a lockdep issue [1] Since raw_bind() and raw_setsockopt() first get RTNL before locking the socket, we must adopt the same order in raw_release() [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/14110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline] ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8e3df368 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: raw_bind+0xa7/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:434 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x181/0x1340 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 raw_release+0x1c6/0x9b0 net/can/raw.c:391 __sock_release+0xcd/0x290 net/socket.c:654 sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1386 __fput+0x3fd/0xac0 fs/file_table.c:384 task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:179 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:171 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x210/0x240 kernel/entry/common.c:204 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:286 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:297 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline] raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435 __sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.0/14110: stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 14110 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x311/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline] raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435 __sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fd89007cb29 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fd890d2a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd89019bf80 RCX: 00007fd89007cb29 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fd8900c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd89019bf80 R15: 00007ffebf8124f8 </TASK> Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720114438.172434-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> 
syzbot complained about a lockdep issue [1]

Since raw_bind() and raw_setsockopt() first get RTNL
before locking the socket, we must adopt the same order in raw_release()

[1]
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/14110 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline]
ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8e3df368 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: raw_bind+0xa7/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:434

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x181/0x1340 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
raw_release+0x1c6/0x9b0 net/can/raw.c:391
__sock_release+0xcd/0x290 net/socket.c:654
sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1386
__fput+0x3fd/0xac0 fs/file_table.c:384
task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:179
resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:171 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x210/0x240 kernel/entry/common.c:204
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:286 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:297
do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline]
raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435
__sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(rtnl_mutex);
        lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN);
        lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.0/14110:

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 14110 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x311/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline]
raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435
__sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fd89007cb29
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fd890d2a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd89019bf80 RCX: 00007fd89007cb29
RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fd8900c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd89019bf80 R15: 00007ffebf8124f8
</TASK>

Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720114438.172434-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
can: bcm: Fix UAF in bcm_proc_show() 2023-07-17T07:46:26+00:00 YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com 2023-07-15T09:25:43+00:00 55c3b96074f3f9b0aee19bf93cd71af7516582bb BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bcm_proc_show+0x969/0xa80 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888155846230 by task cat/7862 CPU: 1 PID: 7862 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-00153-gc8746099c197 #230 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xd5/0x150 print_report+0xc1/0x5e0 kasan_report+0xba/0xf0 bcm_proc_show+0x969/0xa80 seq_read_iter+0x4f6/0x1260 seq_read+0x165/0x210 proc_reg_read+0x227/0x300 vfs_read+0x1d5/0x8d0 ksys_read+0x11e/0x240 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Allocated by task 7846: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x9e/0xa0 bcm_sendmsg+0x264b/0x44e0 sock_sendmsg+0xda/0x180 ____sys_sendmsg+0x735/0x920 ___sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x1b0 __sys_sendmsg+0xfa/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Freed by task 7846: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40 ____kasan_slab_free+0x161/0x1c0 slab_free_freelist_hook+0x119/0x220 __kmem_cache_free+0xb4/0x2e0 rcu_core+0x809/0x1bd0 bcm_op is freed before procfs entry be removed in bcm_release(), this lead to bcm_proc_show() may read the freed bcm_op. Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230715092543.15548-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> 
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bcm_proc_show+0x969/0xa80
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888155846230 by task cat/7862

CPU: 1 PID: 7862 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-00153-gc8746099c197 #230
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xd5/0x150
 print_report+0xc1/0x5e0
 kasan_report+0xba/0xf0
 bcm_proc_show+0x969/0xa80
 seq_read_iter+0x4f6/0x1260
 seq_read+0x165/0x210
 proc_reg_read+0x227/0x300
 vfs_read+0x1d5/0x8d0
 ksys_read+0x11e/0x240
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Allocated by task 7846:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
 __kasan_kmalloc+0x9e/0xa0
 bcm_sendmsg+0x264b/0x44e0
 sock_sendmsg+0xda/0x180
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x735/0x920
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x1b0
 __sys_sendmsg+0xfa/0x1d0
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Freed by task 7846:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
 kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40
 ____kasan_slab_free+0x161/0x1c0
 slab_free_freelist_hook+0x119/0x220
 __kmem_cache_free+0xb4/0x2e0
 rcu_core+0x809/0x1bd0

bcm_op is freed before procfs entry be removed in bcm_release(),
this lead to bcm_proc_show() may read the freed bcm_op.

Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230715092543.15548-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
can: raw: fix receiver memory leak 2023-07-17T07:23:31+00:00 Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com 2023-07-11T01:17:37+00:00 ee8b94c8510ce64afe0b87ef548d23e00915fb10 Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase: for ((i=1; i<=100; i++)) do ./can_filter & sleep 0.1 done ============================================================== [<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can] [<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw] [<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0 [<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70 [<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6 It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many() and raw_release() as following: cpu0 cpu1 unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev) unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this net_set_todo(can_dev) raw_release(can_socket) dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); dev_put(dev); } ... ro->bound = 0; ... call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, ) raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, ) if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0 raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists. Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier") Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> 
Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase:

for ((i=1; i<=100; i++))
do
        ./can_filter &
        sleep 0.1
done

==============================================================
[<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can]
[<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw]
[<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0
[<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70
[<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6

It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many()
and raw_release() as following:

             cpu0                                        cpu1
unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev)
  unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this
  net_set_todo(can_dev)
						raw_release(can_socket)
						  dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL
						  if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL
						    raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, );
						    dev_put(dev);
						  }
						  ...
						  ro->bound = 0;
						  ...

call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
  raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
    if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0
      raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed

Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound
can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between
raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use
ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists.

Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net 2023-06-27T16:45:22+00:00 Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org 2023-06-27T16:45:22+00:00 3674fbf0451df0395f9fa18df3122927006a3829 Merge in late fixes to prepare for the 6.5 net-next PR. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
Merge in late fixes to prepare for the 6.5 net-next PR.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) 2023-06-24T22:50:13+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2023-06-23T22:55:12+00:00 dc97391e661009eab46783030d2404c9b6e6f2e7 Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked(). sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead. This allows multiple pages and multipage folios to be passed through. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> # for net/can cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev cc: rds-devel@oss.oracle.com cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-16-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 
Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked().  sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead.  This allows multiple pages and
multipage folios to be passed through.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> # for net/can
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
cc: rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-16-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>