linux.git/mm, branch v4.20-rc4

mm/memblock.c: fix a typo in __next_mem_pfn_range() comments

2018-11-18T18:15:10+00:00

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107100247.13359-1-rainccrun@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Chen Chang 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, page_alloc: check for max order in hot path

2018-11-18T18:15:10+00:00

Konstantin has noticed that kvmalloc might trigger the following
warning:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6676 at mm/vmstat.c:986 __fragmentation_index+0x54/0x60
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   fragmentation_index+0x76/0x90
   compaction_suitable+0x4f/0xf0
   shrink_node+0x295/0x310
   node_reclaim+0x205/0x250
   get_page_from_freelist+0x649/0xad0
   __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x12a/0x2a0
   kmalloc_large_node+0x47/0x90
   __kmalloc_node+0x22b/0x2e0
   kvmalloc_node+0x3e/0x70
   xt_alloc_table_info+0x3a/0x80 [x_tables]
   do_ip6t_set_ctl+0xcd/0x1c0 [ip6_tables]
   nf_setsockopt+0x44/0x60
   SyS_setsockopt+0x6f/0xc0
   do_syscall_64+0x67/0x120
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2

the problem is that we only check for an out of bound order in the slow
path and the node reclaim might happen from the fast path already.  This
is fixable by making sure that kvmalloc doesn't ever use kmalloc for
requests that are larger than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE but this also shows that
the code is rather fragile.  A recent UBSAN report just underlines that
by the following report

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in mm/page_alloc.c:3117:19
  shift exponent 51 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
  CPU: 0 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc2 #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
   dump_stack+0xd2/0x148 lib/dump_stack.c:113
   ubsan_epilogue+0x12/0x94 lib/ubsan.c:159
   __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x2b6/0x30b lib/ubsan.c:425
   __zone_watermark_ok+0x2c7/0x400 mm/page_alloc.c:3117
   zone_watermark_fast mm/page_alloc.c:3216 [inline]
   get_page_from_freelist+0xc49/0x44c0 mm/page_alloc.c:3300
   __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x21e/0x640 mm/page_alloc.c:4370
   alloc_pages_current+0xcc/0x210 mm/mempolicy.c:2093
   alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:509 [inline]
   __get_free_pages+0x12/0x60 mm/page_alloc.c:4414
   dma_mem_alloc+0x36/0x50 arch/x86/include/asm/floppy.h:156
   raw_cmd_copyin drivers/block/floppy.c:3159 [inline]
   raw_cmd_ioctl drivers/block/floppy.c:3206 [inline]
   fd_locked_ioctl+0xa00/0x2c10 drivers/block/floppy.c:3544
   fd_ioctl+0x40/0x60 drivers/block/floppy.c:3571
   __blkdev_driver_ioctl block/ioctl.c:303 [inline]
   blkdev_ioctl+0xb3c/0x1a30 block/ioctl.c:601
   block_ioctl+0x105/0x150 fs/block_dev.c:1883
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x1c0/0x1150 fs/ioctl.c:687
   ksys_ioctl+0x9e/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:702
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:709 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:707 [inline]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7e/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:707
   do_syscall_64+0xc4/0x510 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Note that this is not a kvmalloc path.  It is just that the fast path
really depends on having sanitzed order as well.  Therefore move the
order check to the fast path.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181113094305.GM15120@dhcp22.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko 
Reported-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov 
Reported-by: Kyungtae Kim 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Balbir Singh 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Pavel Tatashin 
Cc: Oscar Salvador 
Cc: Mike Rapoport 
Cc: Aaron Lu 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Byoungyoung Lee 
Cc: "Dae R. Jeong" 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

tmpfs: make lseek(SEEK_DATA/SEK_HOLE) return ENXIO with a negative offset

2018-11-18T18:15:10+00:00

Other filesystems such as ext4, f2fs and ubifs all return ENXIO when
lseek (SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE) requests a negative offset.

man 2 lseek says

:      EINVAL whence  is  not  valid.   Or: the resulting file offset would be
:             negative, or beyond the end of a seekable device.
:
:      ENXIO  whence is SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, and the file offset is  beyond
:             the end of the file.

Make tmpfs return ENXIO under these circumstances as well.  After this,
tmpfs also passes xfstests's generic/448.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: rewrite changelog]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1540434176-14349-1-git-send-email-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Al Viro 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: William Kucharski 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/vmstat.c: fix NUMA statistics updates

2018-11-18T18:15:10+00:00

Scan through the whole array to see if an update is needed.  While we're
at it, use sizeof() to be safe against any possible type changes in the
future.

The bug here is that we wouldn't sync per-cpu counters into global ones
if there was an update of numa_stats for higher cpus.  Highly
theoretical one though because it is much more probable that zone_stats
are updated so we would refresh anyway.  So I wouldn't bother to mark
this for stable, yet something nice to fix.

[mhocko@suse.com: changelog enhancement]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541601517-17282-1-git-send-email-janne.huttunen@nokia.com
Fixes: 1d90ca897cb0 ("mm: update NUMA counter threshold size")
Signed-off-by: Janne Huttunen 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/gup.c: fix follow_page_mask() kerneldoc comment

2018-11-18T18:15:10+00:00

Commit df06b37ffe5a ("mm/gup: cache dev_pagemap while pinning pages")
modified the signature of follow_page_mask() but left the parameter
description behind.

Update the description to make the code and comments agree again.

While at it, update formatting of the return value description to match
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst guidelines.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541603316-27832-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, memory_hotplug: check zone_movable in has_unmovable_pages

2018-11-18T18:15:09+00:00

Page state checks are racy. Under a heavy memory workload (e.g. stress
-m 200 -t 2h) it is quite easy to hit a race window when the page is
allocated but its state is not fully populated yet. A debugging patch to
dump the struct page state shows

has_unmovable_pages: pfn:0x10dfec00, found:0x1, count:0x0
page:ffffea0437fb0000 count:1 mapcount:1 mapping:ffff880e05239841 index:0x7f26e5000 compound_mapcount: 1
flags: 0x5fffffc0090034(uptodate|lru|active|head|swapbacked)

Note that the state has been checked for both PageLRU and PageSwapBacked
already. Closing this race completely would require some sort of retry
logic. This can be tricky and error prone (think of potential endless
or long taking loops).

Workaround this problem for movable zones at least. Such a zone should
only contain movable pages. Commit 15c30bc09085 ("mm, memory_hotplug:
make has_unmovable_pages more robust") has told us that this is not
strictly true though. Bootmem pages should be marked reserved though so
we can move the original check after the PageReserved check. Pages from
other zones are still prone to races but we even do not pretend that
memory hotremove works for those so pre-mature failure doesn't hurt that
much.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181106095524.14629-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Fixes: 15c30bc09085 ("mm, memory_hotplug: make has_unmovable_pages more robust")
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Reported-by: Baoquan He
Tested-by: Baoquan He
Acked-by: Baoquan He
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador
Acked-by: Balbir Singh
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/swapfile.c: use kvzalloc for swap_info_struct allocation

2018-11-18T18:15:09+00:00

Commit a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node")
changed 'avail_lists' field of 'struct swap_info_struct' to an array.
In popular linux distros it increased size of swap_info_struct up to 40
Kbytes and now swap_info_struct allocation requires order-4 page.
Switch to kvzmalloc allows to avoid unexpected allocation failures.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fc23172d-3c75-21e2-d551-8b1808cbe593@virtuozzo.com
Fixes: a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin 
Acked-by: Aaron Lu 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Huang Ying 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

hugetlbfs: fix kernel BUG at fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:444!

2018-11-18T18:15:09+00:00

This bug has been experienced several times by the Oracle DB team.  The
BUG is in remove_inode_hugepages() as follows:

	/*
	 * If page is mapped, it was faulted in after being
	 * unmapped in caller.  Unmap (again) now after taking
	 * the fault mutex.  The mutex will prevent faults
	 * until we finish removing the page.
	 *
	 * This race can only happen in the hole punch case.
	 * Getting here in a truncate operation is a bug.
	 */
	if (unlikely(page_mapped(page))) {
		BUG_ON(truncate_op);

In this case, the elevated map count is not the result of a race.
Rather it was incorrectly incremented as the result of a bug in the huge
pmd sharing code.  Consider the following:

 - Process A maps a hugetlbfs file of sufficient size and alignment
   (PUD_SIZE) that a pmd page could be shared.

 - Process B maps the same hugetlbfs file with the same size and
   alignment such that a pmd page is shared.

 - Process B then calls mprotect() to change protections for the mapping
   with the shared pmd. As a result, the pmd is 'unshared'.

 - Process B then calls mprotect() again to chage protections for the
   mapping back to their original value. pmd remains unshared.

 - Process B then forks and process C is created. During the fork
   process, we do dup_mm -> dup_mmap -> copy_page_range to copy page
   tables. Copying page tables for hugetlb mappings is done in the
   routine copy_hugetlb_page_range.

In copy_hugetlb_page_range(), the destination pte is obtained by:

	dst_pte = huge_pte_alloc(dst, addr, sz);

If pmd sharing is possible, the returned pointer will be to a pte in an
existing page table.  In the situation above, process C could share with
either process A or process B.  Since process A is first in the list,
the returned pte is a pointer to a pte in process A's page table.

However, the check for pmd sharing in copy_hugetlb_page_range is:

	/* If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take references */
	if (dst_pte == src_pte)
		continue;

Since process C is sharing with process A instead of process B, the
above test fails.  The code in copy_hugetlb_page_range which follows
assumes dst_pte points to a huge_pte_none pte.  It copies the pte entry
from src_pte to dst_pte and increments this map count of the associated
page.  This is how we end up with an elevated map count.

To solve, check the dst_pte entry for huge_pte_none.  If !none, this
implies PMD sharing so do not copy.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105212315.14125-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: c5c99429fa57 ("fix hugepages leak due to pagetable page sharing")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz 
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" 
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Prakash Sangappa 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

z3fold: fix possible reclaim races

2018-11-18T18:15:09+00:00

Reclaim and free can race on an object which is basically fine but in
order for reclaim to be able to map "freed" object we need to encode
object length in the handle.  handle_to_chunks() is then introduced to
extract object length from a handle and use it during mapping.

Moreover, to avoid racing on a z3fold "headless" page release, we should
not try to free that page in z3fold_free() if the reclaim bit is set.
Also, in the unlikely case of trying to reclaim a page being freed, we
should not proceed with that page.

While at it, fix the page accounting in reclaim function.

This patch supersedes "[PATCH] z3fold: fix reclaim lock-ups".

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105162225.74e8837d03583a9b707cf559@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool 
Signed-off-by: Jongseok Kim 
Reported-by-by: Jongseok Kim 
Reviewed-by: Snild Dolkow 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

memory_hotplug: cond_resched in __remove_pages

2018-11-03T17:09:38+00:00

We have received a bug report that unbinding a large pmem (>1TB) can
result in a soft lockup:

  NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 23s! [ndctl:4365]
  [...]
  Supported: Yes
  CPU: 9 PID: 4365 Comm: ndctl Not tainted 4.12.14-94.40-default #1 SLE12-SP4
  Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFD/S2600WFD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.00.0833.051120182255 05/11/2018
  task: ffff9cce7d4410c0 task.stack: ffffbe9eb1bc4000
  RIP: 0010:__put_page+0x62/0x80
  Call Trace:
   devm_memremap_pages_release+0x152/0x260
   release_nodes+0x18d/0x1d0
   device_release_driver_internal+0x160/0x210
   unbind_store+0xb3/0xe0
   kernfs_fop_write+0x102/0x180
   __vfs_write+0x26/0x150
   vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
   SyS_write+0x42/0x90
   do_syscall_64+0x74/0x150
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
  RIP: 0033:0x7fd13166b3d0

It has been reported on an older (4.12) kernel but the current upstream
code doesn't cond_resched in the hot remove code at all and the given
range to remove might be really large.  Fix the issue by calling
cond_resched once per memory section.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181031125840.23982-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn 
Cc: Dan Williams 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds