Pull sysctl updates from Luis Chamberlain: "Only a small step forward on the sysctl cleanups for this cycle" * tag 'sysctl-6.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux: sched: Move numa_balancing sysctls to its own file
Pull non-MM updates from Andrew Morton: - A ptrace API cleanup series from Sergey Shtylyov - Fixes and cleanups for kexec from ye xingchen - nilfs2 updates from Ryusuke Konishi - squashfs feature work from Xiaoming Ni: permit configuration of the filesystem's compression concurrency from the mount command line - A series from Akinobu Mita which addresses bound checking errors when writing to debugfs files - A series from Yang Yingliang to address rapidio memory leaks - A series from Zheng Yejian to address possible overflow errors in encode_comp_t() - And a whole shower of singleton patches all over the place * tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2022-12-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (79 commits) ipc: fix memory leak in init_mqueue_fs() hfsplus: fix bug causing custom uid and gid being unable to be assigned with mount rapidio: devices: fix missing put_device in mport_cdev_open kcov: fix spelling typos in comments hfs: Fix OOB Write in hfs_asc2mac hfs: fix OOB Read in __hfs_brec_find relay: fix type mismatch when allocating memory in relay_create_buf() ocfs2: always read both high and low parts of dinode link count io-mapping: move some code within the include guarded section kernel: kcsan: kcsan_test: build without structleak plugin mailmap: update email for Iskren Chernev eventfd: change int to __u64 in eventfd_signal() ifndef CONFIG_EVENTFD rapidio: fix possible UAF when kfifo_alloc() fails relay: use strscpy() is more robust and safer cpumask: limit visibility of FORCE_NR_CPUS acct: fix potential integer overflow in encode_comp_t() acct: fix accuracy loss for input value of encode_comp_t() linux/init.h: include <linux/build_bug.h> and <linux/stringify.h> rapidio: rio: fix possible name leak in rio_register_mport() rapidio: fix possible name leaks when rio_add_device() fails ...
The sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit and sysctl_numa_balancing are part of sched, move them to its own file. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Use try_cmpxchg instead of cmpxchg (*ptr, old, new) == old in task_numa_work. x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag, so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg (and related move instruction in front of cmpxchg). No functional change intended. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220822173956.82525-1-ubizjak@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When evaluating the CPU candidates in the perf domain (pd) containing the previously used CPU (prev_cpu), find_energy_efficient_cpu() evaluates the energy of the pd: - without the task (base_energy) - with the task placed on prev_cpu (if the task fits) - with the task placed on the CPU with the highest spare capacity, prev_cpu being excluded from this set If prev_cpu is already the CPU with the highest spare capacity, max_spare_cap_cpu will be the CPU with the second highest spare capacity. On an Arm64 Juno-r2, with a workload of 10 tasks at a 10% duty cycle, when prev_cpu and max_spare_cap_cpu are both valid candidates, prev_spare_cap > max_spare_cap at ~82%. Thus the energy of the pd when placing the task on max_spare_cap_cpu is computed with no possible positive outcome 82% most of the time. Do not consider max_spare_cap_cpu as a valid candidate if prev_spare_cap > max_spare_cap. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006081052.3862167-2-pierre.gondois@arm.com
We do consider thermal pressure in util_fits_cpu() for uclamp_min only. With the exception of the biggest cores which by definition are the max performance point of the system and all tasks by definition should fit. Even under thermal pressure, the capacity of the biggest CPU is the highest in the system and should still fit every task. Except when it reaches capacity inversion point, then this is no longer true. We can handle this by using the inverted capacity as capacity_orig in util_fits_cpu(). Which not only addresses the problem above, but also ensure uclamp_max now considers the inverted capacity. Force fitting a task when a CPU is in this adverse state will contribute to making the thermal throttling last longer. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220804143609.515789-10-qais.yousef@arm.com
Check each performance domain to see if thermal pressure is causing its capacity to be lower than another performance domain. We assume that each performance domain has CPUs with the same capacities, which is similar to an assumption made in energy_model.c We also assume that thermal pressure impacts all CPUs in a performance domain equally. If there're multiple performance domains with the same capacity_orig, we will trigger a capacity inversion if the domain is under thermal pressure. The new cpu_in_capacity_inversion() should help users to know when information about capacity_orig are not reliable and can opt in to use the inverted capacity as the 'actual' capacity_orig. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220804143609.515789-9-qais.yousef@arm.com
If the utilization of the woken up task is 0, we skip the energy
calculation because it has no impact.
But if the task is boosted (uclamp_min != 0) will have an impact on task
placement and frequency selection. Only skip if the util is truly
0 after applying uclamp values.
Change uclamp_task_cpu() signature to avoid unnecessary additional calls
to uclamp_eff_get(). feec() is the only user now.
Fixes: 732cd75b8c920 ("sched/fair: Select an energy-efficient CPU on task wake-up")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220804143609.515789-8-qais.yousef@arm.com
So that it is now uclamp aware.
This fixes a major problem of busy tasks capped with UCLAMP_MAX keeping
the system in overutilized state which disables EAS and leads to wasting
energy in the long run.
Without this patch running a busy background activity like JIT
compilation on Pixel 6 causes the system to be in overutilized state
74.5% of the time.
With this patch this goes down to 9.79%.
It also fixes another problem when long running tasks that have their
UCLAMP_MIN changed while running such that they need to upmigrate to
honour the new UCLAMP_MIN value. The upmigration doesn't get triggered
because overutilized state never gets set in this state, hence misfit
migration never happens at tick in this case until the task wakes up
again.
Fixes: af24bde8df202 ("sched/uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute()")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220804143609.515789-7-qais.yousef@arm.com
Use the new util_fits_cpu() to ensure migration margin and capacity
pressure are taken into account correctly when uclamp is being used
otherwise we will fail to consider CPUs as fitting in scenarios where
they should.
s/asym_fits_capacity/asym_fits_cpu/ to better reflect what it does now.
Fixes: b4c9c9f15649 ("sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220804143609.515789-6-qais.yousef@arm.com