<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/kernel/sched/fair.c, branch v5.10</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip</title>
<updated>2020-11-22T21:26:07+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-22T21:26:07+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=f4b936f5d6fd0625a78a7b4b92e98739a2bdb6f7'/>
<id>f4b936f5d6fd0625a78a7b4b92e98739a2bdb6f7</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A couple of scheduler fixes:

   - Make the conditional update of the overutilized state work
     correctly by caching the relevant flags state before overwriting
     them and checking them afterwards.

   - Fix a data race in the wakeup path which caused loadavg on ARM64
     platforms to become a random number generator.

   - Fix the ordering of the iowaiter accounting operations so it can't
     be decremented before it is incremented.

   - Fix a bug in the deadline scheduler vs. priority inheritance when a
     non-deadline task A has inherited the parameters of a deadline task
     B and then blocks on a non-deadline task C.

     The second inheritance step used the static deadline parameters of
     task A, which are usually 0, instead of further propagating task
     B's parameters. The zero initialized parameters trigger a bug in
     the deadline scheduler"

* tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched/deadline: Fix priority inheritance with multiple scheduling classes
  sched: Fix rq-&gt;nr_iowait ordering
  sched: Fix data-race in wakeup
  sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A couple of scheduler fixes:

   - Make the conditional update of the overutilized state work
     correctly by caching the relevant flags state before overwriting
     them and checking them afterwards.

   - Fix a data race in the wakeup path which caused loadavg on ARM64
     platforms to become a random number generator.

   - Fix the ordering of the iowaiter accounting operations so it can't
     be decremented before it is incremented.

   - Fix a bug in the deadline scheduler vs. priority inheritance when a
     non-deadline task A has inherited the parameters of a deadline task
     B and then blocks on a non-deadline task C.

     The second inheritance step used the static deadline parameters of
     task A, which are usually 0, instead of further propagating task
     B's parameters. The zero initialized parameters trigger a bug in
     the deadline scheduler"

* tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched/deadline: Fix priority inheritance with multiple scheduling classes
  sched: Fix rq-&gt;nr_iowait ordering
  sched: Fix data-race in wakeup
  sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()</title>
<updated>2020-11-17T12:15:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Quentin Perret</name>
<email>qperret@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-12T11:12:01+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=8e1ac4299a6e8726de42310d9c1379f188140c71'/>
<id>8e1ac4299a6e8726de42310d9c1379f188140c71</id>
<content type='text'>
enqueue_task_fair() attempts to skip the overutilized update for new
tasks as their util_avg is not accurate yet. However, the flag we check
to do so is overwritten earlier on in the function, which makes the
condition pretty much a nop.

Fix this by saving the flag early on.

Fixes: 2802bf3cd936 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator")
Reported-by: Rick Yiu &lt;rickyiu@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret &lt;qperret@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guittot@linaro.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider &lt;valentin.schneider@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112111201.2081902-1-qperret@google.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
enqueue_task_fair() attempts to skip the overutilized update for new
tasks as their util_avg is not accurate yet. However, the flag we check
to do so is overwritten earlier on in the function, which makes the
condition pretty much a nop.

Fix this by saving the flag early on.

Fixes: 2802bf3cd936 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator")
Reported-by: Rick Yiu &lt;rickyiu@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret &lt;qperret@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guittot@linaro.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider &lt;valentin.schneider@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112111201.2081902-1-qperret@google.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip</title>
<updated>2020-11-15T17:39:35+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-15T17:39:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=d0a37fd57fbae32adffb56ae9852d551376b7c9b'/>
<id>d0a37fd57fbae32adffb56ae9852d551376b7c9b</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A set of scheduler fixes:

   - Address a load balancer regression by making the load balancer use
     the same logic as the wakeup path to spread tasks in the LLC domain

   - Prefer the CPU on which a task run last over the local CPU in the
     fast wakeup path for asymmetric CPU capacity systems to align with
     the symmetric case. This ensures more locality and prevents massive
     migration overhead on those asymetric systems

   - Fix a memory corruption bug in the scheduler debug code caused by
     handing a modified buffer pointer to kfree()"

* tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched/debug: Fix memory corruption caused by multiple small reads of flags
  sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
  sched/fair: Ensure tasks spreading in LLC during LB
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A set of scheduler fixes:

   - Address a load balancer regression by making the load balancer use
     the same logic as the wakeup path to spread tasks in the LLC domain

   - Prefer the CPU on which a task run last over the local CPU in the
     fast wakeup path for asymmetric CPU capacity systems to align with
     the symmetric case. This ensures more locality and prevents massive
     migration overhead on those asymetric systems

   - Fix a memory corruption bug in the scheduler debug code caused by
     handing a modified buffer pointer to kfree()"

* tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched/debug: Fix memory corruption caused by multiple small reads of flags
  sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
  sched/fair: Ensure tasks spreading in LLC during LB
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path</title>
<updated>2020-11-10T17:38:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Vincent Guittot</name>
<email>vincent.guittot@linaro.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-29T16:18:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=b4c9c9f15649c98a5b45408919d1ff4fd7f5531c'/>
<id>b4c9c9f15649c98a5b45408919d1ff4fd7f5531c</id>
<content type='text'>
During fast wakeup path, scheduler always check whether local or prev
cpus are good candidates for the task before looking for other cpus in
the domain. With commit b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU
capacity wakeup scan") the heterogenous system gains a dedicated path
but doesn't try to reuse prev cpu whenever possible. If the previous
cpu is idle and belong to the LLC domain, we should check it 1st
before looking for another cpu because it stays one of the best
candidate and this also stabilizes task placement on the system.

This change aligns asymmetric path behavior with symmetric one and reduces
cases where the task migrates across all cpus of the sd_asym_cpucapacity
domains at wakeup.

This change does not impact normal EAS mode but only the overloaded case or
when EAS is not used.

- On hikey960 with performance governor (EAS disable)

./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
             mainline           w/ patch
# migrations   999364                  0
ops/sec        149313(+/-0.28%)   182587(+/- 0.40) +22%

- On hikey with performance governor

./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
             mainline           w/ patch
# migrations        0                  0
ops/sec         47721(+/-0.76%)    47899(+/- 0.56) +0.4%

According to test on hikey, the patch doesn't impact symmetric system
compared to current implementation (only tested on arm64)

Also read the uclamped value of task's utilization at most twice instead
instead each time we compare task's utilization with cpu's capacity.

Fixes: b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guittot@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann &lt;dietmar.eggemann@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider &lt;valentin.schneider@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029161824.26389-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
During fast wakeup path, scheduler always check whether local or prev
cpus are good candidates for the task before looking for other cpus in
the domain. With commit b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU
capacity wakeup scan") the heterogenous system gains a dedicated path
but doesn't try to reuse prev cpu whenever possible. If the previous
cpu is idle and belong to the LLC domain, we should check it 1st
before looking for another cpu because it stays one of the best
candidate and this also stabilizes task placement on the system.

This change aligns asymmetric path behavior with symmetric one and reduces
cases where the task migrates across all cpus of the sd_asym_cpucapacity
domains at wakeup.

This change does not impact normal EAS mode but only the overloaded case or
when EAS is not used.

- On hikey960 with performance governor (EAS disable)

./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
             mainline           w/ patch
# migrations   999364                  0
ops/sec        149313(+/-0.28%)   182587(+/- 0.40) +22%

- On hikey with performance governor

./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
             mainline           w/ patch
# migrations        0                  0
ops/sec         47721(+/-0.76%)    47899(+/- 0.56) +0.4%

According to test on hikey, the patch doesn't impact symmetric system
compared to current implementation (only tested on arm64)

Also read the uclamped value of task's utilization at most twice instead
instead each time we compare task's utilization with cpu's capacity.

Fixes: b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guittot@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann &lt;dietmar.eggemann@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider &lt;valentin.schneider@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029161824.26389-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched/fair: Ensure tasks spreading in LLC during LB</title>
<updated>2020-11-10T17:38:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Vincent Guittot</name>
<email>vincent.guittot@linaro.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-02T10:24:57+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=16b0a7a1a0af9db6e008fecd195fe4d6cb366d83'/>
<id>16b0a7a1a0af9db6e008fecd195fe4d6cb366d83</id>
<content type='text'>
schbench shows latency increase for 95 percentile above since:
  commit 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")

Align the behavior of the load balancer with the wake up path, which tries
to select an idle CPU which belongs to the LLC for a waking task.

calculate_imbalance() will use nr_running instead of the spare
capacity when CPUs share resources (ie cache) at the domain level. This
will ensure a better spread of tasks on idle CPUs.

Running schbench on a hikey (8cores arm64) shows the problem:

tip/sched/core :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
	50.0th: 33
	75.0th: 45
	90.0th: 51
	95.0th: 4152
	*99.0th: 14288
	99.5th: 14288
	99.9th: 14288
	min=0, max=14276

tip/sched/core + patch :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
	50.0th: 34
	75.0th: 47
	90.0th: 52
	95.0th: 78
	*99.0th: 94
	99.5th: 94
	99.9th: 94
	min=0, max=94

Fixes: 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Reported-by: Chris Mason &lt;clm@fb.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@surriel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guittot@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@surriel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@surriel.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102102457.28808-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
schbench shows latency increase for 95 percentile above since:
  commit 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")

Align the behavior of the load balancer with the wake up path, which tries
to select an idle CPU which belongs to the LLC for a waking task.

calculate_imbalance() will use nr_running instead of the spare
capacity when CPUs share resources (ie cache) at the domain level. This
will ensure a better spread of tasks on idle CPUs.

Running schbench on a hikey (8cores arm64) shows the problem:

tip/sched/core :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
	50.0th: 33
	75.0th: 45
	90.0th: 51
	95.0th: 4152
	*99.0th: 14288
	99.5th: 14288
	99.9th: 14288
	min=0, max=14276

tip/sched/core + patch :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
	50.0th: 34
	75.0th: 47
	90.0th: 52
	95.0th: 78
	*99.0th: 94
	99.5th: 94
	99.9th: 94
	min=0, max=94

Fixes: 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Reported-by: Chris Mason &lt;clm@fb.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@surriel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guittot@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@surriel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@surriel.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102102457.28808-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")</title>
<updated>2020-10-25T21:51:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Joe Perches</name>
<email>joe@perches.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-22T02:36:07+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=33def8498fdde180023444b08e12b72a9efed41d'/>
<id>33def8498fdde180023444b08e12b72a9efed41d</id>
<content type='text'>
Use a more generic form for __section that requires quotes to avoid
complications with clang and gcc differences.

Remove the quote operator # from compiler_attributes.h __section macro.

Convert all unquoted __section(foo) uses to quoted __section("foo").
Also convert __attribute__((section("foo"))) uses to __section("foo")
even if the __attribute__ has multiple list entry forms.

Conversion done using the script at:

    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/75393e5ddc272dc7403de74d645e6c6e0f4e70eb.camel@perches.com/2-convert_section.pl

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches &lt;joe@perches.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers &lt;ndesaulniers@gooogle.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda &lt;ojeda@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Use a more generic form for __section that requires quotes to avoid
complications with clang and gcc differences.

Remove the quote operator # from compiler_attributes.h __section macro.

Convert all unquoted __section(foo) uses to quoted __section("foo").
Also convert __attribute__((section("foo"))) uses to __section("foo")
even if the __attribute__ has multiple list entry forms.

Conversion done using the script at:

    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/75393e5ddc272dc7403de74d645e6c6e0f4e70eb.camel@perches.com/2-convert_section.pl

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches &lt;joe@perches.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers &lt;ndesaulniers@gooogle.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda &lt;ojeda@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>task_work: cleanup notification modes</title>
<updated>2020-10-17T21:05:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jens Axboe</name>
<email>axboe@kernel.dk</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-16T15:02:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=91989c707884ecc7cd537281ab1a4b8fb7219da3'/>
<id>91989c707884ecc7cd537281ab1a4b8fb7219da3</id>
<content type='text'>
A previous commit changed the notification mode from true/false to an
int, allowing notify-no, notify-yes, or signal-notify. This was
backwards compatible in the sense that any existing true/false user
would translate to either 0 (on notification sent) or 1, the latter
which mapped to TWA_RESUME. TWA_SIGNAL was assigned a value of 2.

Clean this up properly, and define a proper enum for the notification
mode. Now we have:

- TWA_NONE. This is 0, same as before the original change, meaning no
  notification requested.
- TWA_RESUME. This is 1, same as before the original change, meaning
  that we use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.
- TWA_SIGNAL. This uses TIF_SIGPENDING/JOBCTL_TASK_WORK for the
  notification.

Clean up all the callers, switching their 0/1/false/true to using the
appropriate TWA_* mode for notifications.

Fixes: e91b48162332 ("task_work: teach task_work_add() to do signal_wake_up()")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
A previous commit changed the notification mode from true/false to an
int, allowing notify-no, notify-yes, or signal-notify. This was
backwards compatible in the sense that any existing true/false user
would translate to either 0 (on notification sent) or 1, the latter
which mapped to TWA_RESUME. TWA_SIGNAL was assigned a value of 2.

Clean this up properly, and define a proper enum for the notification
mode. Now we have:

- TWA_NONE. This is 0, same as before the original change, meaning no
  notification requested.
- TWA_RESUME. This is 1, same as before the original change, meaning
  that we use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.
- TWA_SIGNAL. This uses TIF_SIGPENDING/JOBCTL_TASK_WORK for the
  notification.

Clean up all the callers, switching their 0/1/false/true to using the
appropriate TWA_* mode for notifications.

Fixes: e91b48162332 ("task_work: teach task_work_add() to do signal_wake_up()")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched/debug: Add new tracepoint to track cpu_capacity</title>
<updated>2020-10-03T14:30:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Vincent Donnefort</name>
<email>vincent.donnefort@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-08-28T09:00:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=51cf18c90ca1b51d1cb4af3064e85fcf8610b5d2'/>
<id>51cf18c90ca1b51d1cb4af3064e85fcf8610b5d2</id>
<content type='text'>
rq-&gt;cpu_capacity is a key element in several scheduler parts, such as EAS
task placement and load balancing. Tracking this value enables testing
and/or debugging by a toolkit.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort &lt;vincent.donnefort@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1598605249-72651-1-git-send-email-vincent.donnefort@arm.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
rq-&gt;cpu_capacity is a key element in several scheduler parts, such as EAS
task placement and load balancing. Tracking this value enables testing
and/or debugging by a toolkit.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort &lt;vincent.donnefort@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1598605249-72651-1-git-send-email-vincent.donnefort@arm.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched/fair: Tweak pick_next_entity()</title>
<updated>2020-10-03T14:30:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Peter Oskolkov</name>
<email>posk@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-09-30T17:35:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=9abb897345ce1d41257567f571a78137c961c405'/>
<id>9abb897345ce1d41257567f571a78137c961c405</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, pick_next_entity(...) has the following structure
(simplified):

  [...]
  if (last_buddy_ok())
    result = last_buddy;
  if (next_buddy_ok())
    result = next_buddy;
  [...]

The intended behavior is to prefer next buddy over last buddy;
the current code somewhat obfuscates this, and also wastes
cycles checking the last buddy when eventually the next buddy is
picked up.

So this patch refactors two 'ifs' above into

  [...]
  if (next_buddy_ok())
      result = next_buddy;
  else if (last_buddy_ok())
      result = last_buddy;
  [...]

Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov &lt;posk@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guitttot@linaro.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930173532.1069092-1-posk@google.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently, pick_next_entity(...) has the following structure
(simplified):

  [...]
  if (last_buddy_ok())
    result = last_buddy;
  if (next_buddy_ok())
    result = next_buddy;
  [...]

The intended behavior is to prefer next buddy over last buddy;
the current code somewhat obfuscates this, and also wastes
cycles checking the last buddy when eventually the next buddy is
picked up.

So this patch refactors two 'ifs' above into

  [...]
  if (next_buddy_ok())
      result = next_buddy;
  else if (last_buddy_ok())
      result = last_buddy;
  [...]

Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov &lt;posk@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot &lt;vincent.guitttot@linaro.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930173532.1069092-1-posk@google.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sched/fair: Use dst group while checking imbalance for NUMA balancer</title>
<updated>2020-09-25T12:23:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Barry Song</name>
<email>song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-09-21T22:18:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=233e7aca4c8a2c764f556bba9644c36154017e7f'/>
<id>233e7aca4c8a2c764f556bba9644c36154017e7f</id>
<content type='text'>
Barry Song noted the following

	Something is wrong. In find_busiest_group(), we are checking if
	src has higher load, however, in task_numa_find_cpu(), we are
	checking if dst will have higher load after balancing. It seems
	it is not sensible to check src.

	It maybe cause wrong imbalance value, for example,

	if dst_running = env-&gt;dst_stats.nr_running + 1 results in 3 or
	above, and src_running = env-&gt;src_stats.nr_running - 1 results
	in 1;

	The current code is thinking imbalance as 0 since src_running is
	smaller than 2.  This is inconsistent with load balancer.

Basically, in find_busiest_group(), the NUMA imbalance is ignored if moving
a task "from an almost idle domain" to a "domain with spare capacity". This
patch forbids movement "from a misplaced domain" to "an almost idle domain"
as that is closer to what the CPU load balancer expects.

This patch is not a universal win. The old behaviour was intended to allow
a task from an almost idle NUMA node to migrate to its preferred node if
the destination had capacity but there are corner cases.  For example,
a NAS compute load could be parallelised to use 1/3rd of available CPUs
but not all those potential tasks are active at all times allowing this
logic to trigger. An obvious example is specjbb 2005 running various
numbers of warehouses on a 2 socket box with 80 cpus.

specjbb
                               5.9.0-rc4              5.9.0-rc4
                                 vanilla        dstbalance-v1r1
Hmean     tput-1     46425.00 (   0.00%)    43394.00 *  -6.53%*
Hmean     tput-2     98416.00 (   0.00%)    96031.00 *  -2.42%*
Hmean     tput-3    150184.00 (   0.00%)   148783.00 *  -0.93%*
Hmean     tput-4    200683.00 (   0.00%)   197906.00 *  -1.38%*
Hmean     tput-5    236305.00 (   0.00%)   245549.00 *   3.91%*
Hmean     tput-6    281559.00 (   0.00%)   285692.00 *   1.47%*
Hmean     tput-7    338558.00 (   0.00%)   334467.00 *  -1.21%*
Hmean     tput-8    340745.00 (   0.00%)   372501.00 *   9.32%*
Hmean     tput-9    424343.00 (   0.00%)   413006.00 *  -2.67%*
Hmean     tput-10   421854.00 (   0.00%)   434261.00 *   2.94%*
Hmean     tput-11   493256.00 (   0.00%)   485330.00 *  -1.61%*
Hmean     tput-12   549573.00 (   0.00%)   529959.00 *  -3.57%*
Hmean     tput-13   593183.00 (   0.00%)   555010.00 *  -6.44%*
Hmean     tput-14   588252.00 (   0.00%)   599166.00 *   1.86%*
Hmean     tput-15   623065.00 (   0.00%)   642713.00 *   3.15%*
Hmean     tput-16   703924.00 (   0.00%)   660758.00 *  -6.13%*
Hmean     tput-17   666023.00 (   0.00%)   697675.00 *   4.75%*
Hmean     tput-18   761502.00 (   0.00%)   758360.00 *  -0.41%*
Hmean     tput-19   796088.00 (   0.00%)   798368.00 *   0.29%*
Hmean     tput-20   733564.00 (   0.00%)   823086.00 *  12.20%*
Hmean     tput-21   840980.00 (   0.00%)   856711.00 *   1.87%*
Hmean     tput-22   804285.00 (   0.00%)   872238.00 *   8.45%*
Hmean     tput-23   795208.00 (   0.00%)   889374.00 *  11.84%*
Hmean     tput-24   848619.00 (   0.00%)   966783.00 *  13.92%*
Hmean     tput-25   750848.00 (   0.00%)   903790.00 *  20.37%*
Hmean     tput-26   780523.00 (   0.00%)   962254.00 *  23.28%*
Hmean     tput-27  1042245.00 (   0.00%)   991544.00 *  -4.86%*
Hmean     tput-28  1090580.00 (   0.00%)  1035926.00 *  -5.01%*
Hmean     tput-29   999483.00 (   0.00%)  1082948.00 *   8.35%*
Hmean     tput-30  1098663.00 (   0.00%)  1113427.00 *   1.34%*
Hmean     tput-31  1125671.00 (   0.00%)  1134175.00 *   0.76%*
Hmean     tput-32   968167.00 (   0.00%)  1250286.00 *  29.14%*
Hmean     tput-33  1077676.00 (   0.00%)  1060893.00 *  -1.56%*
Hmean     tput-34  1090538.00 (   0.00%)  1090933.00 *   0.04%*
Hmean     tput-35   967058.00 (   0.00%)  1107421.00 *  14.51%*
Hmean     tput-36  1051745.00 (   0.00%)  1210663.00 *  15.11%*
Hmean     tput-37  1019465.00 (   0.00%)  1351446.00 *  32.56%*
Hmean     tput-38  1083102.00 (   0.00%)  1064541.00 *  -1.71%*
Hmean     tput-39  1232990.00 (   0.00%)  1303623.00 *   5.73%*
Hmean     tput-40  1175542.00 (   0.00%)  1340943.00 *  14.07%*
Hmean     tput-41  1127826.00 (   0.00%)  1339492.00 *  18.77%*
Hmean     tput-42  1198313.00 (   0.00%)  1411023.00 *  17.75%*
Hmean     tput-43  1163733.00 (   0.00%)  1228253.00 *   5.54%*
Hmean     tput-44  1305562.00 (   0.00%)  1357886.00 *   4.01%*
Hmean     tput-45  1326752.00 (   0.00%)  1406061.00 *   5.98%*
Hmean     tput-46  1339424.00 (   0.00%)  1418451.00 *   5.90%*
Hmean     tput-47  1415057.00 (   0.00%)  1381570.00 *  -2.37%*
Hmean     tput-48  1392003.00 (   0.00%)  1421167.00 *   2.10%*
Hmean     tput-49  1408374.00 (   0.00%)  1418659.00 *   0.73%*
Hmean     tput-50  1359822.00 (   0.00%)  1391070.00 *   2.30%*
Hmean     tput-51  1414246.00 (   0.00%)  1392679.00 *  -1.52%*
Hmean     tput-52  1432352.00 (   0.00%)  1354020.00 *  -5.47%*
Hmean     tput-53  1387563.00 (   0.00%)  1409563.00 *   1.59%*
Hmean     tput-54  1406420.00 (   0.00%)  1388711.00 *  -1.26%*
Hmean     tput-55  1438804.00 (   0.00%)  1387472.00 *  -3.57%*
Hmean     tput-56  1399465.00 (   0.00%)  1400296.00 *   0.06%*
Hmean     tput-57  1428132.00 (   0.00%)  1396399.00 *  -2.22%*
Hmean     tput-58  1432385.00 (   0.00%)  1386253.00 *  -3.22%*
Hmean     tput-59  1421612.00 (   0.00%)  1371416.00 *  -3.53%*
Hmean     tput-60  1429423.00 (   0.00%)  1389412.00 *  -2.80%*
Hmean     tput-61  1396230.00 (   0.00%)  1351122.00 *  -3.23%*
Hmean     tput-62  1418396.00 (   0.00%)  1383098.00 *  -2.49%*
Hmean     tput-63  1409918.00 (   0.00%)  1374662.00 *  -2.50%*
Hmean     tput-64  1410236.00 (   0.00%)  1376216.00 *  -2.41%*
Hmean     tput-65  1396405.00 (   0.00%)  1364418.00 *  -2.29%*
Hmean     tput-66  1395975.00 (   0.00%)  1357326.00 *  -2.77%*
Hmean     tput-67  1392986.00 (   0.00%)  1349642.00 *  -3.11%*
Hmean     tput-68  1386541.00 (   0.00%)  1343261.00 *  -3.12%*
Hmean     tput-69  1374407.00 (   0.00%)  1342588.00 *  -2.32%*
Hmean     tput-70  1377513.00 (   0.00%)  1334654.00 *  -3.11%*
Hmean     tput-71  1369319.00 (   0.00%)  1334952.00 *  -2.51%*
Hmean     tput-72  1354635.00 (   0.00%)  1329005.00 *  -1.89%*
Hmean     tput-73  1350933.00 (   0.00%)  1318942.00 *  -2.37%*
Hmean     tput-74  1351714.00 (   0.00%)  1316347.00 *  -2.62%*
Hmean     tput-75  1352198.00 (   0.00%)  1309974.00 *  -3.12%*
Hmean     tput-76  1349490.00 (   0.00%)  1286064.00 *  -4.70%*
Hmean     tput-77  1336131.00 (   0.00%)  1303684.00 *  -2.43%*
Hmean     tput-78  1308896.00 (   0.00%)  1271024.00 *  -2.89%*
Hmean     tput-79  1326703.00 (   0.00%)  1290862.00 *  -2.70%*
Hmean     tput-80  1336199.00 (   0.00%)  1291629.00 *  -3.34%*

The performance at the mid-point is better but not universally better. The
patch is a mixed bag depending on the workload, machine and overall
levels of utilisation. Sometimes it's better (sometimes much better),
other times it is worse (sometimes much worse). Given that there isn't a
universally good decision in this section and more people seem to prefer
the patch then it may be best to keep the LB decisions consistent and
revisit imbalance handling when the load balancer code changes settle down.

Jirka Hladky added the following observation.

	Our results are mostly in line with what you see. We observe
	big gains (20-50%) when the system is loaded to 1/3 of the
	maximum capacity and mixed results at the full load - some
	workloads benefit from the patch at the full load, others not,
	but performance changes at the full load are mostly within the
	noise of results (+/-5%). Overall, we think this patch is helpful.

[mgorman@techsingularity.net: Rewrote changelog]
Fixes: fb86f5b211 ("sched/numa: Use similar logic to the load balancer for moving between domains with spare capacity")
Signed-off-by: Barry Song &lt;song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@techsingularity.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921221849.GI3179@techsingularity.net
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Barry Song noted the following

	Something is wrong. In find_busiest_group(), we are checking if
	src has higher load, however, in task_numa_find_cpu(), we are
	checking if dst will have higher load after balancing. It seems
	it is not sensible to check src.

	It maybe cause wrong imbalance value, for example,

	if dst_running = env-&gt;dst_stats.nr_running + 1 results in 3 or
	above, and src_running = env-&gt;src_stats.nr_running - 1 results
	in 1;

	The current code is thinking imbalance as 0 since src_running is
	smaller than 2.  This is inconsistent with load balancer.

Basically, in find_busiest_group(), the NUMA imbalance is ignored if moving
a task "from an almost idle domain" to a "domain with spare capacity". This
patch forbids movement "from a misplaced domain" to "an almost idle domain"
as that is closer to what the CPU load balancer expects.

This patch is not a universal win. The old behaviour was intended to allow
a task from an almost idle NUMA node to migrate to its preferred node if
the destination had capacity but there are corner cases.  For example,
a NAS compute load could be parallelised to use 1/3rd of available CPUs
but not all those potential tasks are active at all times allowing this
logic to trigger. An obvious example is specjbb 2005 running various
numbers of warehouses on a 2 socket box with 80 cpus.

specjbb
                               5.9.0-rc4              5.9.0-rc4
                                 vanilla        dstbalance-v1r1
Hmean     tput-1     46425.00 (   0.00%)    43394.00 *  -6.53%*
Hmean     tput-2     98416.00 (   0.00%)    96031.00 *  -2.42%*
Hmean     tput-3    150184.00 (   0.00%)   148783.00 *  -0.93%*
Hmean     tput-4    200683.00 (   0.00%)   197906.00 *  -1.38%*
Hmean     tput-5    236305.00 (   0.00%)   245549.00 *   3.91%*
Hmean     tput-6    281559.00 (   0.00%)   285692.00 *   1.47%*
Hmean     tput-7    338558.00 (   0.00%)   334467.00 *  -1.21%*
Hmean     tput-8    340745.00 (   0.00%)   372501.00 *   9.32%*
Hmean     tput-9    424343.00 (   0.00%)   413006.00 *  -2.67%*
Hmean     tput-10   421854.00 (   0.00%)   434261.00 *   2.94%*
Hmean     tput-11   493256.00 (   0.00%)   485330.00 *  -1.61%*
Hmean     tput-12   549573.00 (   0.00%)   529959.00 *  -3.57%*
Hmean     tput-13   593183.00 (   0.00%)   555010.00 *  -6.44%*
Hmean     tput-14   588252.00 (   0.00%)   599166.00 *   1.86%*
Hmean     tput-15   623065.00 (   0.00%)   642713.00 *   3.15%*
Hmean     tput-16   703924.00 (   0.00%)   660758.00 *  -6.13%*
Hmean     tput-17   666023.00 (   0.00%)   697675.00 *   4.75%*
Hmean     tput-18   761502.00 (   0.00%)   758360.00 *  -0.41%*
Hmean     tput-19   796088.00 (   0.00%)   798368.00 *   0.29%*
Hmean     tput-20   733564.00 (   0.00%)   823086.00 *  12.20%*
Hmean     tput-21   840980.00 (   0.00%)   856711.00 *   1.87%*
Hmean     tput-22   804285.00 (   0.00%)   872238.00 *   8.45%*
Hmean     tput-23   795208.00 (   0.00%)   889374.00 *  11.84%*
Hmean     tput-24   848619.00 (   0.00%)   966783.00 *  13.92%*
Hmean     tput-25   750848.00 (   0.00%)   903790.00 *  20.37%*
Hmean     tput-26   780523.00 (   0.00%)   962254.00 *  23.28%*
Hmean     tput-27  1042245.00 (   0.00%)   991544.00 *  -4.86%*
Hmean     tput-28  1090580.00 (   0.00%)  1035926.00 *  -5.01%*
Hmean     tput-29   999483.00 (   0.00%)  1082948.00 *   8.35%*
Hmean     tput-30  1098663.00 (   0.00%)  1113427.00 *   1.34%*
Hmean     tput-31  1125671.00 (   0.00%)  1134175.00 *   0.76%*
Hmean     tput-32   968167.00 (   0.00%)  1250286.00 *  29.14%*
Hmean     tput-33  1077676.00 (   0.00%)  1060893.00 *  -1.56%*
Hmean     tput-34  1090538.00 (   0.00%)  1090933.00 *   0.04%*
Hmean     tput-35   967058.00 (   0.00%)  1107421.00 *  14.51%*
Hmean     tput-36  1051745.00 (   0.00%)  1210663.00 *  15.11%*
Hmean     tput-37  1019465.00 (   0.00%)  1351446.00 *  32.56%*
Hmean     tput-38  1083102.00 (   0.00%)  1064541.00 *  -1.71%*
Hmean     tput-39  1232990.00 (   0.00%)  1303623.00 *   5.73%*
Hmean     tput-40  1175542.00 (   0.00%)  1340943.00 *  14.07%*
Hmean     tput-41  1127826.00 (   0.00%)  1339492.00 *  18.77%*
Hmean     tput-42  1198313.00 (   0.00%)  1411023.00 *  17.75%*
Hmean     tput-43  1163733.00 (   0.00%)  1228253.00 *   5.54%*
Hmean     tput-44  1305562.00 (   0.00%)  1357886.00 *   4.01%*
Hmean     tput-45  1326752.00 (   0.00%)  1406061.00 *   5.98%*
Hmean     tput-46  1339424.00 (   0.00%)  1418451.00 *   5.90%*
Hmean     tput-47  1415057.00 (   0.00%)  1381570.00 *  -2.37%*
Hmean     tput-48  1392003.00 (   0.00%)  1421167.00 *   2.10%*
Hmean     tput-49  1408374.00 (   0.00%)  1418659.00 *   0.73%*
Hmean     tput-50  1359822.00 (   0.00%)  1391070.00 *   2.30%*
Hmean     tput-51  1414246.00 (   0.00%)  1392679.00 *  -1.52%*
Hmean     tput-52  1432352.00 (   0.00%)  1354020.00 *  -5.47%*
Hmean     tput-53  1387563.00 (   0.00%)  1409563.00 *   1.59%*
Hmean     tput-54  1406420.00 (   0.00%)  1388711.00 *  -1.26%*
Hmean     tput-55  1438804.00 (   0.00%)  1387472.00 *  -3.57%*
Hmean     tput-56  1399465.00 (   0.00%)  1400296.00 *   0.06%*
Hmean     tput-57  1428132.00 (   0.00%)  1396399.00 *  -2.22%*
Hmean     tput-58  1432385.00 (   0.00%)  1386253.00 *  -3.22%*
Hmean     tput-59  1421612.00 (   0.00%)  1371416.00 *  -3.53%*
Hmean     tput-60  1429423.00 (   0.00%)  1389412.00 *  -2.80%*
Hmean     tput-61  1396230.00 (   0.00%)  1351122.00 *  -3.23%*
Hmean     tput-62  1418396.00 (   0.00%)  1383098.00 *  -2.49%*
Hmean     tput-63  1409918.00 (   0.00%)  1374662.00 *  -2.50%*
Hmean     tput-64  1410236.00 (   0.00%)  1376216.00 *  -2.41%*
Hmean     tput-65  1396405.00 (   0.00%)  1364418.00 *  -2.29%*
Hmean     tput-66  1395975.00 (   0.00%)  1357326.00 *  -2.77%*
Hmean     tput-67  1392986.00 (   0.00%)  1349642.00 *  -3.11%*
Hmean     tput-68  1386541.00 (   0.00%)  1343261.00 *  -3.12%*
Hmean     tput-69  1374407.00 (   0.00%)  1342588.00 *  -2.32%*
Hmean     tput-70  1377513.00 (   0.00%)  1334654.00 *  -3.11%*
Hmean     tput-71  1369319.00 (   0.00%)  1334952.00 *  -2.51%*
Hmean     tput-72  1354635.00 (   0.00%)  1329005.00 *  -1.89%*
Hmean     tput-73  1350933.00 (   0.00%)  1318942.00 *  -2.37%*
Hmean     tput-74  1351714.00 (   0.00%)  1316347.00 *  -2.62%*
Hmean     tput-75  1352198.00 (   0.00%)  1309974.00 *  -3.12%*
Hmean     tput-76  1349490.00 (   0.00%)  1286064.00 *  -4.70%*
Hmean     tput-77  1336131.00 (   0.00%)  1303684.00 *  -2.43%*
Hmean     tput-78  1308896.00 (   0.00%)  1271024.00 *  -2.89%*
Hmean     tput-79  1326703.00 (   0.00%)  1290862.00 *  -2.70%*
Hmean     tput-80  1336199.00 (   0.00%)  1291629.00 *  -3.34%*

The performance at the mid-point is better but not universally better. The
patch is a mixed bag depending on the workload, machine and overall
levels of utilisation. Sometimes it's better (sometimes much better),
other times it is worse (sometimes much worse). Given that there isn't a
universally good decision in this section and more people seem to prefer
the patch then it may be best to keep the LB decisions consistent and
revisit imbalance handling when the load balancer code changes settle down.

Jirka Hladky added the following observation.

	Our results are mostly in line with what you see. We observe
	big gains (20-50%) when the system is loaded to 1/3 of the
	maximum capacity and mixed results at the full load - some
	workloads benefit from the patch at the full load, others not,
	but performance changes at the full load are mostly within the
	noise of results (+/-5%). Overall, we think this patch is helpful.

[mgorman@techsingularity.net: Rewrote changelog]
Fixes: fb86f5b211 ("sched/numa: Use similar logic to the load balancer for moving between domains with spare capacity")
Signed-off-by: Barry Song &lt;song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@techsingularity.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921221849.GI3179@techsingularity.net
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
