<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h, branch v4.11</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Merge branches 'doc.2017.01.15b', 'dyntick.2017.01.23a', 'fixes.2017.01.23a', 'srcu.2017.01.25a' and 'torture.2017.01.15b' into HEAD</title>
<updated>2017-01-25T20:56:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-25T20:56:05+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=31945aa9f14085c81cb3257e51bb210698b78626'/>
<id>31945aa9f14085c81cb3257e51bb210698b78626</id>
<content type='text'>
doc.2017.01.15b: Documentation updates
dyntick.2017.01.23a: Dyntick tracking consolidation
fixes.2017.01.23a: Miscellaneous fixes
srcu.2017.01.25a: SRCU rewrite, fixes, and verification
torture.2017.01.15b: Torture-test updates
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
doc.2017.01.15b: Documentation updates
dyntick.2017.01.23a: Dyntick tracking consolidation
fixes.2017.01.23a: Miscellaneous fixes
srcu.2017.01.25a: SRCU rewrite, fixes, and verification
torture.2017.01.15b: Torture-test updates
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination</title>
<updated>2017-01-23T19:44:18+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-03T00:25:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=02a5c550b2738f2bfea8e1e00aa75944d71c9e18'/>
<id>02a5c550b2738f2bfea8e1e00aa75944d71c9e18</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit is the fourth step towards full abstraction of all accesses
to the -&gt;dynticks counter, implementing previously open-coded checks and
comparisons in new rcu_dynticks_in_eqs() and rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since()
functions.  This abstraction will ease changes to the -&gt;dynticks counter
operation.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit is the fourth step towards full abstraction of all accesses
to the -&gt;dynticks counter, implementing previously open-coded checks and
comparisons in new rcu_dynticks_in_eqs() and rcu_dynticks_in_eqs_since()
functions.  This abstraction will ease changes to the -&gt;dynticks counter
operation.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Add lockdep checks to synchronous expedited primitives</title>
<updated>2017-01-23T19:37:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-09T23:25:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=8dc79888a792f6c365c2a26903e49ff919e72488'/>
<id>8dc79888a792f6c365c2a26903e49ff919e72488</id>
<content type='text'>
The non-expedited synchronize_*rcu() primitives have lockdep checks, but
their expedited counterparts lack these checks.  This commit therefore
adds these checks to the expedited synchronize_*rcu() primitives.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The non-expedited synchronize_*rcu() primitives have lockdep checks, but
their expedited counterparts lack these checks.  This commit therefore
adds these checks to the expedited synchronize_*rcu() primitives.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Add comment headers to expedited-grace-period counter functions</title>
<updated>2017-01-23T19:37:13+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-12-18T21:31:02+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=09e2db37ec6d22bc27e2ba94ab4889541567f52e'/>
<id>09e2db37ec6d22bc27e2ba94ab4889541567f52e</id>
<content type='text'>
These functions (rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(), rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(),
rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(), and rcu_exp_gp_seq_done() seemed too obvious
to comment when written, but not so much when being documented.
This commit therefore adds header comments to each of them.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
These functions (rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(), rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(),
rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(), and rcu_exp_gp_seq_done() seemed too obvious
to comment when written, but not so much when being documented.
This commit therefore adds header comments to each of them.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation</title>
<updated>2017-01-16T23:47:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-02T21:12:05+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=8b2f63ab05eb233b2b396e133889ce3d1d30d944'/>
<id>8b2f63ab05eb233b2b396e133889ce3d1d30d944</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit is the second step towards full abstraction of all accesses to
the -&gt;dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic
add of zero in a new rcu_dynticks_snap() function.  This abstraction will
ease changes o the -&gt;dynticks counter operation.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit is the second step towards full abstraction of all accesses to
the -&gt;dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic
add of zero in a new rcu_dynticks_snap() function.  This abstraction will
ease changes o the -&gt;dynticks counter operation.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett &lt;josh@joshtriplett.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Narrow early boot window of illegal synchronous grace periods</title>
<updated>2017-01-15T05:23:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-10T10:28:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=52d7e48b86fc108e45a656d8e53e4237993c481d'/>
<id>52d7e48b86fc108e45a656d8e53e4237993c481d</id>
<content type='text'>
The current preemptible RCU implementation goes through three phases
during bootup.  In the first phase, there is only one CPU that is running
with preemption disabled, so that a no-op is a synchronous grace period.
In the second mid-boot phase, the scheduler is running, but RCU has
not yet gotten its kthreads spawned (and, for expedited grace periods,
workqueues are not yet running.  During this time, any attempt to do
a synchronous grace period will hang the system (or complain bitterly,
depending).  In the third and final phase, RCU is fully operational and
everything works normally.

This has been OK for some time, but there has recently been some
synchronous grace periods showing up during the second mid-boot phase.
This code worked "by accident" for awhile, but started failing as soon
as expedited RCU grace periods switched over to workqueues in commit
8b355e3bc140 ("rcu: Drive expedited grace periods from workqueue").
Note that the code was buggy even before this commit, as it was subject
to failure on real-time systems that forced all expedited grace periods
to run as normal grace periods (for example, using the rcu_normal ksysfs
parameter).  The callchain from the failure case is as follows:

early_amd_iommu_init()
|-&gt; acpi_put_table(ivrs_base);
|-&gt; acpi_tb_put_table(table_desc);
|-&gt; acpi_tb_invalidate_table(table_desc);
|-&gt; acpi_tb_release_table(...)
|-&gt; acpi_os_unmap_memory
|-&gt; acpi_os_unmap_iomem
|-&gt; acpi_os_map_cleanup
|-&gt; synchronize_rcu_expedited

The kernel showing this callchain was built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y,
which caused the code to try using workqueues before they were
initialized, which did not go well.

This commit therefore reworks RCU to permit synchronous grace periods
to proceed during this mid-boot phase.  This commit is therefore a
fix to a regression introduced in v4.9, and is therefore being put
forward post-merge-window in v4.10.

This commit sets a flag from the existing rcu_scheduler_starting()
function which causes all synchronous grace periods to take the expedited
path.  The expedited path now checks this flag, using the requesting task
to drive the expedited grace period forward during the mid-boot phase.
Finally, this flag is updated by a core_initcall() function named
rcu_exp_runtime_mode(), which causes the runtime codepaths to be used.

Note that this arrangement assumes that tasks are not sent POSIX signals
(or anything similar) from the time that the first task is spawned
through core_initcall() time.

Fixes: 8b355e3bc140 ("rcu: Drive expedited grace periods from workqueue")
Reported-by: "Zheng, Lv" &lt;lv.zheng@intel.com&gt;
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@alien8.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Stan Kain &lt;stan.kain@gmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Ivan &lt;waffolz@hotmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Emanuel Castelo &lt;emanuel.castelo@gmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Bruno Pesavento &lt;bpesavento@infinito.it&gt;
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;
Tested-by: Frederic Bezies &lt;fredbezies@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.9.0-
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The current preemptible RCU implementation goes through three phases
during bootup.  In the first phase, there is only one CPU that is running
with preemption disabled, so that a no-op is a synchronous grace period.
In the second mid-boot phase, the scheduler is running, but RCU has
not yet gotten its kthreads spawned (and, for expedited grace periods,
workqueues are not yet running.  During this time, any attempt to do
a synchronous grace period will hang the system (or complain bitterly,
depending).  In the third and final phase, RCU is fully operational and
everything works normally.

This has been OK for some time, but there has recently been some
synchronous grace periods showing up during the second mid-boot phase.
This code worked "by accident" for awhile, but started failing as soon
as expedited RCU grace periods switched over to workqueues in commit
8b355e3bc140 ("rcu: Drive expedited grace periods from workqueue").
Note that the code was buggy even before this commit, as it was subject
to failure on real-time systems that forced all expedited grace periods
to run as normal grace periods (for example, using the rcu_normal ksysfs
parameter).  The callchain from the failure case is as follows:

early_amd_iommu_init()
|-&gt; acpi_put_table(ivrs_base);
|-&gt; acpi_tb_put_table(table_desc);
|-&gt; acpi_tb_invalidate_table(table_desc);
|-&gt; acpi_tb_release_table(...)
|-&gt; acpi_os_unmap_memory
|-&gt; acpi_os_unmap_iomem
|-&gt; acpi_os_map_cleanup
|-&gt; synchronize_rcu_expedited

The kernel showing this callchain was built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y,
which caused the code to try using workqueues before they were
initialized, which did not go well.

This commit therefore reworks RCU to permit synchronous grace periods
to proceed during this mid-boot phase.  This commit is therefore a
fix to a regression introduced in v4.9, and is therefore being put
forward post-merge-window in v4.10.

This commit sets a flag from the existing rcu_scheduler_starting()
function which causes all synchronous grace periods to take the expedited
path.  The expedited path now checks this flag, using the requesting task
to drive the expedited grace period forward during the mid-boot phase.
Finally, this flag is updated by a core_initcall() function named
rcu_exp_runtime_mode(), which causes the runtime codepaths to be used.

Note that this arrangement assumes that tasks are not sent POSIX signals
(or anything similar) from the time that the first task is spawned
through core_initcall() time.

Fixes: 8b355e3bc140 ("rcu: Drive expedited grace periods from workqueue")
Reported-by: "Zheng, Lv" &lt;lv.zheng@intel.com&gt;
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@alien8.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Stan Kain &lt;stan.kain@gmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Ivan &lt;waffolz@hotmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Emanuel Castelo &lt;emanuel.castelo@gmail.com&gt;
Tested-by: Bruno Pesavento &lt;bpesavento@infinito.it&gt;
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;
Tested-by: Frederic Bezies &lt;fredbezies@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.9.0-
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Make expedited grace periods recheck dyntick idle state</title>
<updated>2016-11-14T18:46:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-10-11T13:09:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=0742ac3e2f9f4b8a3a394a270d8685078837662b'/>
<id>0742ac3e2f9f4b8a3a394a270d8685078837662b</id>
<content type='text'>
Expedited grace periods check dyntick-idle state, and avoid sending
IPIs to idle CPUs, including those running guest OSes, and, on NOHZ_FULL
kernels, nohz_full CPUs.  However, the kernel has been observed checking
a CPU while it was non-idle, but sending the IPI after it has gone
idle.  This commit therefore rechecks idle state immediately before
sending the IPI, refraining from IPIing CPUs that have since gone idle.

Reported-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Expedited grace periods check dyntick-idle state, and avoid sending
IPIs to idle CPUs, including those running guest OSes, and, on NOHZ_FULL
kernels, nohz_full CPUs.  However, the kernel has been observed checking
a CPU while it was non-idle, but sending the IPI after it has gone
idle.  This commit therefore rechecks idle state immediately before
sending the IPI, refraining from IPIing CPUs that have since gone idle.

Reported-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Use RCU's online-CPU state for expedited IPI retry</title>
<updated>2016-08-22T16:30:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-06-30T19:16:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=385c859f678e8ee6b0b122086f34e72a0e861cef'/>
<id>385c859f678e8ee6b0b122086f34e72a0e861cef</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit improves the accuracy of the interaction between CPU hotplug
operations and RCU's expedited grace periods by using RCU's online-CPU
state to determine when failed IPIs should be retried.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit improves the accuracy of the interaction between CPU hotplug
operations and RCU's expedited grace periods by using RCU's online-CPU
state to determine when failed IPIs should be retried.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Exclude RCU-offline CPUs from expedited grace periods</title>
<updated>2016-08-22T16:30:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-06-30T00:04:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=98834b83785e1388fa8672cf4f8de09974d15e86'/>
<id>98834b83785e1388fa8672cf4f8de09974d15e86</id>
<content type='text'>
The expedited RCU grace periods currently rely on a failure indication
from smp_call_function_single() to determine that a given CPU is offline.
This works after a fashion, but is more contorted and less precise than
relying on RCU's internal state.  This commit therefore takes a first
step towards relying on internal state.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The expedited RCU grace periods currently rely on a failure indication
from smp_call_function_single() to determine that a given CPU is offline.
This works after a fashion, but is more contorted and less precise than
relying on RCU's internal state.  This commit therefore takes a first
step towards relying on internal state.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Make expedited RCU CPU stall warnings respond to controls</title>
<updated>2016-08-22T16:30:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-06-29T21:49:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=24a6cff286030b98149ff10b968cba31280fcb7a'/>
<id>24a6cff286030b98149ff10b968cba31280fcb7a</id>
<content type='text'>
The expedited RCU CPU stall warnings currently responds to neither the
panic_on_rcu_stall sysctl setting nor the rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_suppress
kernel boot parameter.  This commit therefore updates the expedited code
to respond to these two controls.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The expedited RCU CPU stall warnings currently responds to neither the
panic_on_rcu_stall sysctl setting nor the rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_suppress
kernel boot parameter.  This commit therefore updates the expedited code
to respond to these two controls.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
