The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to RCU_WATCHING, and the snapshot helpers are now prefix by "rcu_watching". Reflect that change into the storage variables for these snapshots. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to RCU_WATCHING, and the snapshot helpers are now prefix by "rcu_watching". Reflect that change into the storage variables for these snapshots. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
The barrier_mutex is used currently to protect (de-)offloading operations and prevent from nocb_lock locking imbalance in rcu_barrier() and shrinker, and also from misordered RCU barrier invocation. Now since RCU (de-)offloading is going to happen on offline CPUs, an RCU barrier will have to be executed while transitionning from offloaded to de-offloaded state. And this can't happen while holding the barrier_mutex. Introduce a NOCB mutex to protect (de-)offloading transitions. The barrier_mutex is still held for now when necessary to avoid barrier callbacks reordering and nocb_lock imbalance. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
nocb_is_setup is a rarely used field, mostly on boot and CPU hotplug. It shouldn't occupy the middle of the rcu state hot fields cacheline. Move it to the end and build it conditionally while at it. More cold NOCB fields are to come. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
doc.2024.06.06a: Documentation updates. fixes.2024.07.04a: Miscellaneous fixes. mb.2024.06.28a: Grace-period memory-barrier redundancy removal. nocb.2024.06.03a: No-CB CPU updates. rcu-tasks.2024.06.06a: RCU-Tasks updates. rcutorture.2024.06.06a: Torture-test updates. srcu.2024.06.18a: SRCU polled-grace-period updates.
In the synchronize_rcu() common case, we will have less than SR_MAX_USERS_WAKE_FROM_GP number of users per GP. Waking up the kworker is pointless just to free the last injected wait head since at that point, all the users have already been awakened. Introduce a new counter to track this and prevent the wakeup in the common case. [ paulmck: Remove atomic_dec_return_release in cannot-happen state. ] Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The bypass lock contention mitigation assumes there can be at most 2 contenders on the bypass lock, following this scheme: 1) One kthread takes the bypass lock 2) Another one spins on it and increment the contended counter 3) A third one (a bypass enqueuer) sees the contended counter on and busy loops waiting on it to decrement. However this assumption is wrong. There can be only one CPU to find the lock contended because call_rcu() (the bypass enqueuer) is the only bypass lock acquire site that may not already hold the NOCB lock beforehand, all the other sites must first contend on the NOCB lock. Therefore step 2) is impossible. The other problem is that the mitigation assumes that contenders all belong to the same rdp CPU, which is also impossible for a raw spinlock. In theory the warning could trigger if the enqueuer holds the bypass lock and another CPU flushes the bypass queue concurrently but this is prevented from all flush users: 1) NOCB kthreads only flush if they successfully _tried_ to lock the bypass lock. So no contention management here. 2) Flush on callbacks migration happen remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. 3) Flush on deoffloading happen either locally with IRQs disabled or remotely when the CPU is not yet online. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. 4) Flush on barrier entrain happen either locally with IRQs disabled or remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. For those reasons, the bypass lock contention mitigation isn't needed and is even wrong. Remove it but keep the warning reporting a contended bypass lock on a remote CPU, to keep unexpected contention awareness. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
fixes.2024.04.15a: RCU fixes misc.2024.04.12a: Miscellaneous fixes rcu-sync-normal-improve.2024.04.15a: Improving synchronize_rcu() call rcu-tasks.2024.04.15a: Tasks RCU updates rcutorture.2024.04.15a: Torture-test updates
This patch introduces a small enhancement which allows to do a direct wake-up of synchronize_rcu() callers. It occurs after a completion of grace period, thus by the gp-kthread. Number of clients is limited by the hard-coded maximum allowed threshold. The remaining part, if still exists is deferred to a main worker. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zd0ZtNu+Rt0qXkfS@lothringen/ Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>