<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/kernel/rcu/tree.h, branch v4.13</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Remove debugfs tracing</title>
<updated>2017-06-09T01:52:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-15T22:30:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=ae91aa0adb14dc33114d566feca2f7cb7a96b8b7'/>
<id>ae91aa0adb14dc33114d566feca2f7cb7a96b8b7</id>
<content type='text'>
RCU's debugfs tracing used to be the only reasonable low-level debug
information available, but ftrace and event tracing has since surpassed
the RCU debugfs level of usefulness.  This commit therefore removes
RCU's debugfs tracing.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
RCU's debugfs tracing used to be the only reasonable low-level debug
information available, but ftrace and event tracing has since surpassed
the RCU debugfs level of usefulness.  This commit therefore removes
RCU's debugfs tracing.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Remove nohz_full full-system-idle state machine</title>
<updated>2017-06-09T01:52:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-11T18:26:22+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=fe5ac724d81a3c7803e60c2232718f212f3f38d4'/>
<id>fe5ac724d81a3c7803e60c2232718f212f3f38d4</id>
<content type='text'>
The NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE full-system-idle capability was added in 2013
by commit 0edd1b1784cb ("nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine"),
but has not been used.  This commit therefore removes it.

If it turns out to be needed later, this commit can always be reverted.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker &lt;fweisbec@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE full-system-idle capability was added in 2013
by commit 0edd1b1784cb ("nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine"),
but has not been used.  This commit therefore removes it.

If it turns out to be needed later, this commit can always be reverted.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker &lt;fweisbec@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Move rnp-&gt;lock wrappers for SRCU use</title>
<updated>2017-06-09T01:52:38+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-09T20:28:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=83d40bd3bc3ab3d6b5a4a331f7667d627948a099'/>
<id>83d40bd3bc3ab3d6b5a4a331f7667d627948a099</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit moves the now-generic rnp-&gt;lock wrapper macros from
kernel/rcu/tree.h to kernel/rcu/rcu.h, thus allowing SRCU to use them.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit moves the now-generic rnp-&gt;lock wrapper macros from
kernel/rcu/tree.h to kernel/rcu/rcu.h, thus allowing SRCU to use them.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Convert rnp-&gt;lock wrappers to macros for SRCU use</title>
<updated>2017-06-09T01:52:37+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-09T19:05:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=bf32c76540257f9f5f2cf661dbdd8bb4a4bd8c82'/>
<id>bf32c76540257f9f5f2cf661dbdd8bb4a4bd8c82</id>
<content type='text'>
Use of smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() would allow SRCU to omit a full
memory barrier during callback execution, so this commit converts
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node() from inline functions to type-generic macros
to allow them to handle locks in srcu_node structures as well as
rcu_node structures.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Use of smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() would allow SRCU to omit a full
memory barrier during callback execution, so this commit converts
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node() from inline functions to type-generic macros
to allow them to handle locks in srcu_node structures as well as
rcu_node structures.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Use RCU_NOCB_WAKE rather than RCU_NOGP_WAKE</title>
<updated>2017-06-08T15:25:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-04-29T00:04:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=511324e462a12ea8be1a7e5fc63a992134db80d7'/>
<id>511324e462a12ea8be1a7e5fc63a992134db80d7</id>
<content type='text'>
The RCU_NOGP_WAKE_NOT, RCU_NOGP_WAKE, and RCU_NOGP_WAKE_FORCE flags
are used to mediate wakeups for the no-CBs CPU kthreads.  The "NOGP"
really doesn't make any sense, so this commit does s/NOGP/NOCB/.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The RCU_NOGP_WAKE_NOT, RCU_NOGP_WAKE, and RCU_NOGP_WAKE_FORCE flags
are used to mediate wakeups for the no-CBs CPU kthreads.  The "NOGP"
really doesn't make any sense, so this commit does s/NOGP/NOCB/.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rcu: Complain if blocking in preemptible RCU read-side critical section</title>
<updated>2017-06-08T15:25:24+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-04-12T22:29:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=5b72f9643b52a5148bb8ced126e20563adfa3466'/>
<id>5b72f9643b52a5148bb8ced126e20563adfa3466</id>
<content type='text'>
Although preemptible RCU allows its read-side critical sections to be
preempted, general blocking is forbidden.  The reason for this is that
excessive preemption times can be handled by CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y, but a
voluntarily blocked task doesn't care how high you boost its priority.
Because preemptible RCU is a global mechanism, one ill-behaved reader
hurts everyone.  Hence the prohibition against general blocking in
RCU-preempt read-side critical sections.  Preemption yes, blocking no.

This commit enforces this prohibition.

There is a special exception for the -rt patchset (which they kindly
volunteered to implement):  It is OK to block (as opposed to merely being
preempted) within an RCU-preempt read-side critical section, but only if
the blocking is subject to priority inheritance.  This exception permits
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y to get -rt RCU readers out of trouble.

Why doesn't this exception also apply to mainline's rt_mutex?  Because
of the possibility that someone does general blocking while holding
an rt_mutex.  Yes, the priority boosting will affect the rt_mutex,
but it won't help with the task doing general blocking while holding
that rt_mutex.

Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Although preemptible RCU allows its read-side critical sections to be
preempted, general blocking is forbidden.  The reason for this is that
excessive preemption times can be handled by CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y, but a
voluntarily blocked task doesn't care how high you boost its priority.
Because preemptible RCU is a global mechanism, one ill-behaved reader
hurts everyone.  Hence the prohibition against general blocking in
RCU-preempt read-side critical sections.  Preemption yes, blocking no.

This commit enforces this prohibition.

There is a special exception for the -rt patchset (which they kindly
volunteered to implement):  It is OK to block (as opposed to merely being
preempted) within an RCU-preempt read-side critical section, but only if
the blocking is subject to priority inheritance.  This exception permits
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y to get -rt RCU readers out of trouble.

Why doesn't this exception also apply to mainline's rt_mutex?  Because
of the possibility that someone does general blocking while holding
an rt_mutex.  Yes, the priority boosting will affect the rt_mutex,
but it won't help with the task doing general blocking while holding
that rt_mutex.

Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>srcu: Debloat the &lt;linux/rcu_segcblist.h&gt; header</title>
<updated>2017-05-02T13:29:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ingo Molnar</name>
<email>mingo@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-02T08:31:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=45753c5f315749711b935a2506ee5c10eef5c23d'/>
<id>45753c5f315749711b935a2506ee5c10eef5c23d</id>
<content type='text'>
Linus noticed that the &lt;linux/rcu_segcblist.h&gt; has huge inline functions
which should not be inline at all.

As a first step in cleaning this up, move them all to kernel/rcu/ and
only keep an absolute minimum of data type defines in the header:

  before:   -rw-r--r-- 1 mingo mingo 22284 May  2 10:25 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
   after:   -rw-r--r-- 1 mingo mingo  3180 May  2 10:22 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h

More can be done, such as uninlining the large functions, which inlining
is unjustified even if it's an RCU internal matter.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Cc: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Linus noticed that the &lt;linux/rcu_segcblist.h&gt; has huge inline functions
which should not be inline at all.

As a first step in cleaning this up, move them all to kernel/rcu/ and
only keep an absolute minimum of data type defines in the header:

  before:   -rw-r--r-- 1 mingo mingo 22284 May  2 10:25 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
   after:   -rw-r--r-- 1 mingo mingo  3180 May  2 10:22 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h

More can be done, such as uninlining the large functions, which inlining
is unjustified even if it's an RCU internal matter.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Cc: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>srcu: Parallelize callback handling</title>
<updated>2017-04-21T12:59:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-04-05T16:01:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=da915ad5cf25b5f5d358dd3670c3378d8ae8c03e'/>
<id>da915ad5cf25b5f5d358dd3670c3378d8ae8c03e</id>
<content type='text'>
Peter Zijlstra proposed using SRCU to reduce mmap_sem contention [1,2],
however, there are workloads that could result in a high volume of
concurrent invocations of call_srcu(), which with current SRCU would
result in excessive lock contention on the srcu_struct structure's
-&gt;queue_lock, which protects SRCU's callback lists.  This commit therefore
moves SRCU to per-CPU callback lists, thus greatly reducing contention.

Because a given SRCU instance no longer has a single centralized callback
list, starting grace periods and invoking callbacks are both more complex
than in the single-list Classic SRCU implementation.  Starting grace
periods and handling callbacks are now handled using an srcu_node tree
that is in some ways similar to the rcu_node trees used by RCU-bh,
RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched (for example, the srcu_node tree shape is
controlled by exactly the same Kconfig options and boot parameters that
control the shape of the rcu_node tree).

In addition, the old per-CPU srcu_array structure is now named srcu_data
and contains an rcu_segcblist structure named -&gt;srcu_cblist for its
callbacks (and a spinlock to protect this).  The srcu_struct gets
an srcu_gp_seq that is used to associate callback segments with the
corresponding completion-time grace-period number.  These completion-time
grace-period numbers are propagated up the srcu_node tree so that the
grace-period workqueue handler can determine whether additional grace
periods are needed on the one hand and where to look for callbacks that
are ready to be invoked.

The srcu_barrier() function must now wait on all instances of the per-CPU
-&gt;srcu_cblist.  Because each -&gt;srcu_cblist is protected by -&gt;lock,
srcu_barrier() can remotely add the needed callbacks.  In theory,
it could also remotely start grace periods, but in practice doing so
is complex and racy.  And interestingly enough, it is never necessary
for srcu_barrier() to start a grace period because srcu_barrier() only
enqueues a callback when a callback is already present--and it turns out
that a grace period has to have already been started for this pre-existing
callback.  Furthermore, it is only the callback that srcu_barrier()
needs to wait on, not any particular grace period.  Therefore, a new
rcu_segcblist_entrain() function enqueues the srcu_barrier() function's
callback into the same segment occupied by the last pre-existing callback
in the list.  The special case where all the pre-existing callbacks are
on a different list (because they are in the process of being invoked)
is handled by enqueuing srcu_barrier()'s callback into the RCU_DONE_TAIL
segment, relying on the done-callbacks check that takes place after all
callbacks are inovked.

Note that the readers use the same algorithm as before.  Note that there
is a separate srcu_idx that tells the readers what counter to increment.
This unfortunately cannot be combined with srcu_gp_seq because they
need to be incremented at different times.

This commit introduces some ugly #ifdefs in rcutorture.  These will go
away when I feel good enough about Tree SRCU to ditch Classic SRCU.

Some crude performance comparisons, courtesy of a quickly hacked rcuperf
asynchronous-grace-period capability:

			Callback Queuing Overhead
			-------------------------
	# CPUS		Classic SRCU	Tree SRCU
	------          ------------    ---------
	     2              0.349 us     0.342 us
	    16             31.66  us     0.4   us
	    41             ---------     0.417 us

The times are the 90th percentiles, a statistic that was chosen to reject
the overheads of the occasional srcu_barrier() call needed to avoid OOMing
the test machine.  The rcuperf test hangs when running Classic SRCU at 41
CPUs, hence the line of dashes.  Despite the hacks to both the rcuperf code
and that statistics, this is a convincing demonstration of Tree SRCU's
performance and scalability advantages.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/309030/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5108281/

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
[ paulmck: Fix initialization if synchronize_srcu_expedited() called first. ]
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Peter Zijlstra proposed using SRCU to reduce mmap_sem contention [1,2],
however, there are workloads that could result in a high volume of
concurrent invocations of call_srcu(), which with current SRCU would
result in excessive lock contention on the srcu_struct structure's
-&gt;queue_lock, which protects SRCU's callback lists.  This commit therefore
moves SRCU to per-CPU callback lists, thus greatly reducing contention.

Because a given SRCU instance no longer has a single centralized callback
list, starting grace periods and invoking callbacks are both more complex
than in the single-list Classic SRCU implementation.  Starting grace
periods and handling callbacks are now handled using an srcu_node tree
that is in some ways similar to the rcu_node trees used by RCU-bh,
RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched (for example, the srcu_node tree shape is
controlled by exactly the same Kconfig options and boot parameters that
control the shape of the rcu_node tree).

In addition, the old per-CPU srcu_array structure is now named srcu_data
and contains an rcu_segcblist structure named -&gt;srcu_cblist for its
callbacks (and a spinlock to protect this).  The srcu_struct gets
an srcu_gp_seq that is used to associate callback segments with the
corresponding completion-time grace-period number.  These completion-time
grace-period numbers are propagated up the srcu_node tree so that the
grace-period workqueue handler can determine whether additional grace
periods are needed on the one hand and where to look for callbacks that
are ready to be invoked.

The srcu_barrier() function must now wait on all instances of the per-CPU
-&gt;srcu_cblist.  Because each -&gt;srcu_cblist is protected by -&gt;lock,
srcu_barrier() can remotely add the needed callbacks.  In theory,
it could also remotely start grace periods, but in practice doing so
is complex and racy.  And interestingly enough, it is never necessary
for srcu_barrier() to start a grace period because srcu_barrier() only
enqueues a callback when a callback is already present--and it turns out
that a grace period has to have already been started for this pre-existing
callback.  Furthermore, it is only the callback that srcu_barrier()
needs to wait on, not any particular grace period.  Therefore, a new
rcu_segcblist_entrain() function enqueues the srcu_barrier() function's
callback into the same segment occupied by the last pre-existing callback
in the list.  The special case where all the pre-existing callbacks are
on a different list (because they are in the process of being invoked)
is handled by enqueuing srcu_barrier()'s callback into the RCU_DONE_TAIL
segment, relying on the done-callbacks check that takes place after all
callbacks are inovked.

Note that the readers use the same algorithm as before.  Note that there
is a separate srcu_idx that tells the readers what counter to increment.
This unfortunately cannot be combined with srcu_gp_seq because they
need to be incremented at different times.

This commit introduces some ugly #ifdefs in rcutorture.  These will go
away when I feel good enough about Tree SRCU to ditch Classic SRCU.

Some crude performance comparisons, courtesy of a quickly hacked rcuperf
asynchronous-grace-period capability:

			Callback Queuing Overhead
			-------------------------
	# CPUS		Classic SRCU	Tree SRCU
	------          ------------    ---------
	     2              0.349 us     0.342 us
	    16             31.66  us     0.4   us
	    41             ---------     0.417 us

The times are the 90th percentiles, a statistic that was chosen to reject
the overheads of the occasional srcu_barrier() call needed to avoid OOMing
the test machine.  The rcuperf test hangs when running Classic SRCU at 41
CPUs, hence the line of dashes.  Despite the hacks to both the rcuperf code
and that statistics, this is a convincing demonstration of Tree SRCU's
performance and scalability advantages.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/309030/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5108281/

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
[ paulmck: Fix initialization if synchronize_srcu_expedited() called first. ]
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>srcu: Move rcu_node traversal macros to rcu.h</title>
<updated>2017-04-18T18:38:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-03-15T20:07:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=efbe451d46af62369226e42b98dbcd95b6940a63'/>
<id>efbe451d46af62369226e42b98dbcd95b6940a63</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit moves rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(),
rcu_for_each_nonleaf_node_breadth_first(), and
rcu_for_each_leaf_node() from kernel/rcu/tree.h to
kernel/rcu/rcu.h so that SRCU can access them.
This commit is code-movement only.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit moves rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(),
rcu_for_each_nonleaf_node_breadth_first(), and
rcu_for_each_leaf_node() from kernel/rcu/tree.h to
kernel/rcu/rcu.h so that SRCU can access them.
This commit is code-movement only.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>srcu: Move combining-tree definitions for SRCU's benefit</title>
<updated>2017-04-18T18:38:20+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul E. McKenney</name>
<email>paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-03-14T19:42:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=f2425b4efb0c69e77c0b9666b605ae4a1ecaae47'/>
<id>f2425b4efb0c69e77c0b9666b605ae4a1ecaae47</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit moves the C preprocessor code that defines the default shape
of the rcu_node combining tree to a new include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h
file as a first step towards enabling SRCU to create its own combining
tree, which in turn enables SRCU to implement per-CPU callback handling,
thus avoiding contention on the lock currently guarding the single list
of callbacks.  Note that users of SRCU still need to know the size of
the srcu_struct structure, hence include/linux rather than kernel/rcu.

This commit is code-movement only.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit moves the C preprocessor code that defines the default shape
of the rcu_node combining tree to a new include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h
file as a first step towards enabling SRCU to create its own combining
tree, which in turn enables SRCU to implement per-CPU callback handling,
thus avoiding contention on the lock currently guarding the single list
of callbacks.  Note that users of SRCU still need to know the size of
the srcu_struct structure, hence include/linux rather than kernel/rcu.

This commit is code-movement only.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
