stall.2023.01.09a: RCU CPU stall-warning updates.
doc.2023.01.05a: Documentation update. fixes.2023.01.23a: Miscellaneous fixes. kvfree.2023.01.03a: kvfree_rcu() updates. srcu.2023.01.03a: SRCU updates. srcu-always.2023.02.02a: Finish making SRCU be unconditionally available. tasks.2023.01.03a: Tasks-RCU updates. torture.2023.01.05a: Torture-test updates. torturescript.2023.01.03a: Torture-test scripting updates.
During suspend, we see failures to suspend 1 in 300-500 suspends.
Looking closer, it appears that asynchronous RCU callbacks are being
queued as lazy even though synchronous callbacks are expedited. These
delays appear to not be very welcome by the suspend/resume code as
evidenced by these occasional suspend failures.
This commit modifies call_rcu() to check if rcu_async_should_hurry(),
which will return true if we are in suspend or in-kernel boot.
[ paulmck: Alphabetize local variables. ]
Ignoring the lazy hint makes the 3000 suspend/resume cycles pass
reliably on a 12th gen 12-core Intel CPU, and there is some evidence
that it also slightly speeds up boot performance.
Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power")
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Boot and suspend/resume should not be slowed down in kernels built with
CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y. In particular, suspend can sometimes fail in such
kernels.
This commit therefore adds rcu_async_hurry(), rcu_async_relax(), and
rcu_async_should_hurry() functions that track whether or not either
a boot or a suspend/resume operation is in progress. This will
enable a later commit to refrain from laziness during those times.
Export rcu_async_should_hurry(), rcu_async_hurry(), and rcu_async_relax()
for later use by rcutorture.
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Steve Rostedt. ]
Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power")
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity() function is invoked at rcutree_online_cpu() and rcutree_offline_cpu() time, early in the online timeline and late in the offline timeline, respectively. It is also invoked from rcutree_dead_cpu(), however, in the absence of userspace manipulations (for which userspace must take responsibility), this call is redundant with that from rcutree_offline_cpu(). This redundancy can be demonstrated by printing out the relevant cpumasks This commit therefore removes the call to rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity() from rcutree_dead_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of short-duration hardware interrupts can result in misleading stall-warning messages. On systems supporting only a single level of interrupts, that is, where interrupts handlers cannot be interrupted, this can produce misleading diagnostics. The stack traces will show the innocent-bystander interrupted task, not the interrupts that are at the very least exacerbating the stall. This situation can be improved by displaying the number of interrupts and the CPU time that they have consumed. Diagnosing other types of stalls can be eased by also providing the count of softirqs and the CPU time that they consumed as well as the number of context switches and the task-level CPU time consumed. Consider the following output given this change: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) <omitted> rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system rcu: number: 624 45 0 rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms) This output shows that the number of hard and soft interrupts is small, there are no context switches, and the system takes up a lot of time. This indicates that the current task is looping with preemption disabled. The impact on system performance is negligible because snapshot is recorded only once for all continuous RCU stalls. This added debugging information is suppressed by default and can be enabled by building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or by booting with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This patch splits the lists of objects so as to avoid sending any through RCU that have already been queued for more than one grace period. These long-term-resident objects are immediately freed. The remaining short-term-resident objects are queued for later freeing using queue_rcu_work(). This change avoids delaying workqueue handlers with synchronize_rcu() invocations. Yes, workqueue handlers are designed to handle blocking, but avoiding blocking when unnecessary improves performance during low-memory situations. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The schedule_delayed_monitor_work() function relies on the count of objects queued into any given kfree_rcu_cpu structure. This count is used to determine how quickly to schedule passing these objects to RCU. There are three pipes where pointers can be placed. When any pipe is offloaded, the kfree_rcu_cpu structure's ->count counter is set to zero, which is wrong because the other pipes might still be non-empty. This commit therefore maintains per-pipe counters, and introduces a krc_count() helper to access the aggregate value of those counters. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The need_offload_krc() function is now lock-free, which gives the compiler freedom to load old values from plain C-language loads from the kfree_rcu_cpu struture's ->head pointer. This commit therefore applied READ_ONCE() to these loads. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Currently all objects placed into a batch wait for a full grace period to elapse after that batch is ready to send to RCU. However, this can unnecessarily delay freeing of the first objects that were added to the batch. After all, several RCU grace periods might have elapsed since those objects were added, and if so, there is no point in further deferring their freeing. This commit therefore adds per-page grace-period snapshots which are obtained from get_state_synchronize_rcu(). When the batch is ready to be passed to call_rcu(), each page's snapshot is checked by passing it to poll_state_synchronize_rcu(). If a given page's RCU grace period has already elapsed, its objects are freed immediately by kvfree_rcu_bulk(). Otherwise, these objects are freed after a call to synchronize_rcu(). This approach requires that the pages be traversed in reverse order, that is, the oldest ones first. Test example: kvm.sh --memory 10G --torture rcuscale --allcpus --duration 1 \ --kconfig CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64 \ --kconfig CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y \ --kconfig CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y \ --kconfig CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n \ --bootargs "rcuscale.kfree_rcu_test=1 rcuscale.kfree_nthreads=16 \ rcuscale.holdoff=20 rcuscale.kfree_loops=10000 \ torture.disable_onoff_at_boot" --trust-make Before this commit: Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8535693700 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1188, memory footprint: 2248MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8466933582 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1157, memory footprint: 2820MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 5375602446 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1130, memory footprint: 6502MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 7523283832 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1006, memory footprint: 3343MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 6459171956 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1150, memory footprint: 6549MB After this commit: Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8560060176 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1787, memory footprint: 61MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8573885501 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1777, memory footprint: 93MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8320000202 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1727, memory footprint: 66MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8552718794 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1790, memory footprint: 75MB Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 8601368792 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 1724, memory footprint: 62MB The reduction in memory footprint is well in excess of an order of magnitude. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>