Chaitanya, John and Mikhail reported commit 25500ba7e77c ("locking/mutex:
Remove the list_head from struct mutex") wrecked ww_mutex.

Specifically there were 2 issues:

 - __ww_waiter_prev() had the termination condition wrong; it would terminate
   when the previous entry was the first, which results in a truncated
   iteration: W3, W2, (no W1).

 - __mutex_add_waiter(@pos != NULL), as used by __ww_waiter_add() /
   __ww_mutex_add_waiter(); this inserts @waiter before @pos (which is what
   list_add_tail() does). But this should then also update lock->first_waiter.

Much thanks to Prateek for spotting the __mutex_add_waiter() issue!

Fixes: 25500ba7e77c ("locking/mutex: Remove the list_head from struct mutex")
Reported-by: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/af005996-05e9-4336-8450-d14ca652ba5d%40intel.com
Reported-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CANDhNCq%3Doizzud3hH3oqGzTrcjB8OwGeineJ3mwZuGdDWG8fRQ%40mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CABXGCsO5fKq2nD9nO8yO1z50ZzgCPWqueNXHANjntaswoOh2Dg@mail.gmail.com
Debugged-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260422092335.GH3102924%40noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net

Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "Fair scheduling updates:
   - Skip SCHED_IDLE rq for SCHED_IDLE tasks (Christian Loehle)
   - Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the wakeup path (K Prateek Nayak)
   - Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() (K Prateek Nayak)
   - Simplify SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() (K Prateek Nayak)
   - Avoid overflow in enqueue_entity() (K Prateek Nayak)
   - Update overutilized detection (Vincent Guittot)
   - Prevent negative lag increase during delayed dequeue (Vincent Guittot)
   - Clear buddies for preempt_short (Vincent Guittot)
   - Implement more complex proportional newidle balance (Peter Zijlstra)
   - Increase weight bits for avg_vruntime (Peter Zijlstra)
   - Use full weight to __calc_delta() (Peter Zijlstra)

  RT and DL scheduling updates:
   - Fix incorrect schedstats for rt and dl thread (Dengjun Su)
   - Skip group schedulable check with rt_group_sched=0 (Michal Koutný)
   - Move group schedulability check to sched_rt_global_validate()
     (Michal Koutný)
   - Add reporting of runtime left & abs deadline to sched_getattr()
     for DEADLINE tasks (Tommaso Cucinotta)

  Scheduling topology updates by K Prateek Nayak:
   - Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions
   - Extract "imb_numa_nr" calculation into a separate helper
   - Allocate per-CPU sched_domain_shared in s_data
   - Switch to assigning "sd->shared" from s_data
   - Remove sched_domain_shared allocation with sd_data

  Energy-aware scheduling updates:
   - Filter false overloaded_group case for EAS (Vincent Guittot)
   - PM: EM: Switch to rcu_dereference_all() in wakeup path
     (Dietmar Eggemann)

  Infrastructure updates:
   - Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq (Marco Crivellari)

  Proxy scheduling updates by John Stultz:
   - Make class_schedulers avoid pushing current, and get rid of proxy_tag_curr()
   - Minimise repeated sched_proxy_exec() checking
   - Fix potentially missing balancing with Proxy Exec
   - Fix and improve task::blocked_on et al handling
   - Add assert_balance_callbacks_empty() helper
   - Add logic to zap balancing callbacks if we pick again
   - Move attach_one_task() and attach_task() helpers to sched.h
   - Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration)
   - Add K Prateek Nayak to scheduler reviewers for proxy execution

  Misc cleanups and fixes by John Stultz, Joseph Salisbury, Peter
  Zijlstra, K Prateek Nayak, Michal Koutný, Randy Dunlap, Shrikanth
  Hegde, Vincent Guittot, Zhan Xusheng, Xie Yuanbin and Vincent Guittot"

* tag 'sched-core-2026-04-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (46 commits)
  sched/eevdf: Clear buddies for preempt_short
  sched/rt: Cleanup global RT bandwidth functions
  sched/rt: Move group schedulability check to sched_rt_global_validate()
  sched/rt: Skip group schedulable check with rt_group_sched=0
  sched/fair: Avoid overflow in enqueue_entity()
  sched: Use u64 for bandwidth ratio calculations
  sched/fair: Prevent negative lag increase during delayed dequeue
  sched/fair: Use sched_energy_enabled()
  sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration)
  sched: Move attach_one_task and attach_task helpers to sched.h
  sched: Add logic to zap balance callbacks if we pick again
  sched: Add assert_balance_callbacks_empty helper
  sched/locking: Add special p->blocked_on==PROXY_WAKING value for proxy return-migration
  sched: Fix modifying donor->blocked on without proper locking
  locking: Add task::blocked_lock to serialize blocked_on state
  sched: Fix potentially missing balancing with Proxy Exec
  sched: Minimise repeated sched_proxy_exec() checking
  sched: Make class_schedulers avoid pushing current, and get rid of proxy_tag_curr()
  MAINTAINERS: Add K Prateek Nayak to scheduler reviewers
  sched/core: Get this cpu once in ttwu_queue_cond()
  ...

As we add functionality to proxy execution, we may migrate a
donor task to a runqueue where it can't run due to cpu affinity.
Thus, we must be careful to ensure we return-migrate the task
back to a cpu in its cpumask when it becomes unblocked.

Peter helpfully provided the following example with pictures:
"Suppose we have a ww_mutex cycle:

                  ,-+-* Mutex-1 <-.
        Task-A ---' |             | ,-- Task-B
                    `-> Mutex-2 *-+-'

Where Task-A holds Mutex-1 and tries to acquire Mutex-2, and
where Task-B holds Mutex-2 and tries to acquire Mutex-1.

Then the blocked_on->owner chain will go in circles.

        Task-A  -> Mutex-2
          ^          |
          |          v
        Mutex-1 <- Task-B

We need two things:

 - find_proxy_task() to stop iterating the circle;

 - the woken task to 'unblock' and run, such that it can
   back-off and re-try the transaction.

Now, the current code [without this patch] does:
        __clear_task_blocked_on();
        wake_q_add();

And surely clearing ->blocked_on is sufficient to break the
cycle.

Suppose it is Task-B that is made to back-off, then we have:

  Task-A -> Mutex-2 -> Task-B (no further blocked_on)

and it would attempt to run Task-B. Or worse, it could directly
pick Task-B and run it, without ever getting into
find_proxy_task().

Now, here is a problem because Task-B might not be runnable on
the CPU it is currently on; and because !task_is_blocked() we
don't get into the proxy paths, so nobody is going to fix this
up.

Ideally we would have dequeued Task-B alongside of clearing
->blocked_on, but alas, [the lock ordering prevents us from
getting the task_rq_lock() and] spoils things."

Thus we need more than just a binary concept of the task being
blocked on a mutex or not.

So allow setting blocked_on to PROXY_WAKING as a special value
which specifies the task is no longer blocked, but needs to
be evaluated for return migration *before* it can be run.

This will then be used in a later patch to handle proxy
return-migration.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260324191337.1841376-7-jstultz@google.com

So far, we have been able to utilize the mutex::wait_lock
for serializing the blocked_on state, but when we move to
proxying across runqueues, we will need to add more state
and a way to serialize changes to this state in contexts
where we don't hold the mutex::wait_lock.

So introduce the task::blocked_lock, which nests under the
mutex::wait_lock in the locking order, and rework the locking
to use it.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260324191337.1841376-5-jstultz@google.com

Add compiler context analysis annotations.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121111213.851599178@infradead.org

Add compiler context analysis annotations.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121111213.745353747@infradead.org

Instead of embedding a list_head in struct mutex, store a pointer to
the first waiter.  The list of waiters remains a doubly linked list so
we can efficiently add to the tail of the list, remove from the front
(or middle) of the list.

Some of the list manipulation becomes more complicated, but it's a
reasonable tradeoff on the slow paths to shrink data structures which
embed a mutex like struct file.

Some of the debug checks have to be deleted because there's no equivalent
to checking them in the new scheme (eg an empty waiter->list now means
that it is the only waiter, not that the waiter is no longer on the list).

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260305195545.3707590-4-willy@infradead.org

The __clear_task_blocked_on() helper added a number of sanity
checks ensuring we hold the mutex wait lock and that the task
we are clearing blocked_on pointer (if set) matches the mutex.

However, there is an edge case in the _ww_mutex_wound() logic
where we need to clear the blocked_on pointer for the task that
owns the mutex, not the task that is waiting on the mutex.

For this case the sanity checks aren't valid, so handle this
by allowing a NULL lock to skip the additional checks.

K Prateek Nayak and Maarten Lankhorst also pointed out that in
this case where we don't hold the owner's mutex wait_lock, we
need to be a bit more careful using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE in both
the __clear_task_blocked_on() and __set_task_blocked_on()
implementations to avoid accidentally tripping WARN_ONs if two
instances race. So do that here as well.

This issue was easier to miss, I realized, as the test-ww_mutex
driver only exercises the wait-die class of ww_mutexes. I've
sent a patch[1] to address this so the logic will be easier to
test.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250801023358.562525-2-jstultz@google.com/

Fixes: a4f0b6fef4b0 ("locking/mutex: Add p->blocked_on wrappers for correctness checks")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/68894443.a00a0220.26d0e1.0015.GAE@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+602c4720aed62576cd79@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250805001026.2247040-1-jstultz@google.com

This lets us assert mutex::wait_lock is held whenever we access
p->blocked_on, as well as warn us for unexpected state changes.

[fix conflicts, call in more places]
[jstultz: tweaked commit subject, reworked a good bit]
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250712033407.2383110-4-jstultz@google.com

Track the blocked-on relation for mutexes, to allow following this
relation at schedule time.

   task
     | blocked-on
     v
   mutex
     | owner
     v
   task

This all will be used for tracking blocked-task/mutex chains
with the prox-execution patch in a similar fashion to how
priority inheritance is done with rt_mutexes.

For serialization, blocked-on is only set by the task itself
(current). And both when setting or clearing (potentially by
others), is done while holding the mutex::wait_lock.

[minor changes while rebasing]
[jstultz: Fix blocked_on tracking in __mutex_lock_common in error paths]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250712033407.2383110-3-jstultz@google.com