linux.git/kernel/futex.c, branch v4.20-rc2

mm: remove include/linux/bootmem.h

2018-10-31T15:54:16+00:00

Move remaining definitions and declarations from include/linux/bootmem.h
into include/linux/memblock.h and remove the redundant header.

The includes were replaced with the semantic patch below and then
semi-automated removal of duplicated '#include 

@@
@@
- #include 
+ #include 

[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: dma-direct: fix up for the removal of linux/bootmem.h]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002185342.133d1680@canb.auug.org.au
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: powerpc: fix up for removal of linux/bootmem.h]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: x86/kaslr, ACPI/NUMA: fix for linux/bootmem.h removal]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181008190341.5e396491@canb.auug.org.au
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536927045-23536-30-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport 
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Chris Zankel 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Cc: Greentime Hu 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Guan Xuetao 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" 
Cc: Jonas Bonn 
Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
Cc: Ley Foon Tan 
Cc: Mark Salter 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Matt Turner 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Michal Simek 
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt 
Cc: Paul Burton 
Cc: Richard Kuo 
Cc: Richard Weinberger 
Cc: Rich Felker 
Cc: Russell King 
Cc: Serge Semin 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Tony Luck 
Cc: Vineet Gupta 
Cc: Yoshinori Sato 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

futex: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep

2018-10-09T11:19:28+00:00

lockdep_assert_held() is better suited for checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when the lock is held by some other task. This
is also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().

Signed-off-by: Lance Roy 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003053902.6910-12-ldr709@gmail.com

futex: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-08-20T16:23:00+00:00

In preparation of enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases which
fall through.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180816172124.GA2407@embeddedor.com

pids: introduce find_get_task_by_vpid() helper

2018-02-07T02:32:46+00:00

There are several functions that do find_task_by_vpid() followed by
get_task_struct().  We can use a helper function instead.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509602027-11337-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport 
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

futex: Fix OWNER_DEAD fixup

2018-01-24T08:58:18+00:00

Both Geert and DaveJ reported that the recent futex commit:

  c1e2f0eaf015 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")

introduced a problem with setting OWNER_DEAD. We set the bit on an
uninitialized variable and then entirely optimize it away as a
dead-store.

Move the setting of the bit to where it is more useful.

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Reported-by: Dave Jones 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Fixes: c1e2f0eaf015 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122103947.GD2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

futex: Prevent overflow by strengthen input validation

2018-01-14T17:55:03+00:00

UBSAN reports signed integer overflow in kernel/futex.c:

 UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/futex.c:2041:18
 signed integer overflow:
 0 - -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int'

Add a sanity check to catch negative values of nr_wake and nr_requeue.

Signed-off-by: Li Jinyue 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513242294-31786-1-git-send-email-lijinyue@huawei.com

futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex

2018-01-14T17:49:16+00:00

Julia reported futex state corruption in the following scenario:

   waiter                                  waker                                            stealer (prio > waiter)

   futex(WAIT_REQUEUE_PI, uaddr, uaddr2,
         timeout=[N ms])
      futex_wait_requeue_pi()
         futex_wait_queue_me()
            freezable_schedule()
            
                                           futex(LOCK_PI, uaddr2)
                                           futex(CMP_REQUEUE_PI, uaddr,
                                                 uaddr2, 1, 0)
                                              /* requeues waiter to uaddr2 */
                                           futex(UNLOCK_PI, uaddr2)
                                                 wake_futex_pi()
                                                    cmp_futex_value_locked(uaddr2, waiter)
                                                    wake_up_q()
           
           task>
                                                                                           futex(LOCK_PI, uaddr2)
                                                                                              __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()
                                                                                                 try_to_take_rt_mutex() /* steals lock */
                                                                                                    rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, stealer)
                                                                                              
         
         rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock()
            __rt_mutex_slowlock()
               try_to_take_rt_mutex() /* fails, lock held by stealer */
               if (timeout && !timeout->task)
                  return -ETIMEDOUT;
            fixup_owner()
               /* lock wasn't acquired, so,
                  fixup_pi_state_owner skipped */

   return -ETIMEDOUT;

   /* At this point, we've returned -ETIMEDOUT to userspace, but the
    * futex word shows waiter to be the owner, and the pi_mutex has
    * stealer as the owner */

   futex_lock(LOCK_PI, uaddr2)
     -> bails with EDEADLK, futex word says we're owner.

And suggested that what commit:

  73d786bd043e ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state")

removes from fixup_owner() looks to be just what is needed. And indeed
it is -- I completely missed that requeue_pi could also result in this
case. So we need to restore that, except that subsequent patches, like
commit:

  16ffa12d7425 ("futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under hb->lock")

changed all the locking rules. Even without that, the sequence:

-               if (rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex)) {
-                       locked = 1;
-                       goto out;
-               }

-               raw_spin_lock_irq(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
-               owner = rt_mutex_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex);
-               if (!owner)
-                       owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex);
-               raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
-               ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, owner);

already suggests there were races; otherwise we'd never have to look
at next_owner.

So instead of doing 3 consecutive wait_lock sections with who knows
what races, we do it all in a single section. Additionally, the usage
of pi_state->owner in fixup_owner() was only safe because only the
rt_mutex owner would modify it, which this additional case wrecks.

Luckily the values can only change away and not to the value we're
testing, this means we can do a speculative test and double check once
we have the wait_lock.

Fixes: 73d786bd043e ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state")
Reported-by: Julia Cartwright 
Reported-by: Gratian Crisan 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Tested-by: Julia Cartwright 
Tested-by: Gratian Crisan 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171208124939.7livp7no2ov65rrc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

futex: futex_wake_op, fix sign_extend32 sign bits

2017-12-10T20:50:57+00:00

sign_extend32 counts the sign bit parameter from 0, not from 1.  So we
have to use "11" for 12th bit, not "12".

This mistake means we have not allowed negative op and cmp args since
commit 30d6e0a4190d ("futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined
behaviour") till now.

Fixes: 30d6e0a4190d ("futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Merge branch 'linus' into core/urgent, to pick up dependent commits

2017-11-04T07:53:04+00:00

We want to fix an objtool build warning that got introduced in the latest upstream kernel.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

futex: futex_wake_op, do not fail on invalid op

2017-11-02T14:41:50+00:00

In commit 30d6e0a4190d ("futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined
behaviour"), I let FUTEX_WAKE_OP to fail on invalid op.  Namely when op
should be considered as shift and the shift is out of range (< 0 or > 31).

But strace's test suite does this madness:

  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xa0caffee);
  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xbadfaced);
  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xffffffff);

When I pick the first 0xa0caffee, it decodes as:

  0x80000000 & 0xa0caffee: oparg is shift
  0x70000000 & 0xa0caffee: op is FUTEX_OP_OR
  0x0f000000 & 0xa0caffee: cmp is FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ
  0x00fff000 & 0xa0caffee: oparg is sign-extended 0xcaf = -849
  0x00000fff & 0xa0caffee: cmparg is sign-extended 0xfee = -18

That means the op tries to do this:

  (futex |= (1 << (-849))) == -18

which is completely bogus. The new check of op in the code is:

        if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
                if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
                        return -EINVAL;
                oparg = 1 << oparg;
        }

which results obviously in the "Invalid argument" errno:

  FAIL: futex
  ===========

  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xa0caffee) = -1: Invalid argument
  futex.test: failed test: ../futex failed with code 1

So let us soften the failure to print only a (ratelimited) message, crop
the value and continue as if it were right.  When userspace keeps up, we
can switch this to return -EINVAL again.

[v2] Do not return 0 immediatelly, proceed with the cropped value.

Fixes: 30d6e0a4190d ("futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds