Currently, iproute2's BPF ELF loader works fine with array of maps
when retrieving the fd from a pinned node and doing a selfcheck
against the provided map attributes from the object file, but we
fail to do the same for hash of maps and thus refuse to get the
map from pinned node.

Reason is that when allocating hash of maps, fd_htab_map_alloc() will
set the value size to sizeof(void *), and any user space map creation
requests are forced to set 4 bytes as value size. Thus, selfcheck
will complain about exposed 8 bytes on 64 bit archs vs. 4 bytes from
object file as value size. Contract is that fdinfo or BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID
returns the value size used to create the map.

Fix it by handling it the same way as we do for array of maps, which
means that we leave value size at 4 bytes and in the allocation phase
round up value size to 8 bytes. alloc_htab_elem() needs an adjustment
in order to copy rounded up 8 bytes due to bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem()
calling into htab_map_update_elem() with the pointer of the map
pointer as value. Unlike array of maps where we just xchg(), we're
using the generic htab_map_update_elem() callback also used from helper
calls, which published the key/value already on return, so we need
to ensure to memcpy() the right size.

Fixes: bcc6b1b7ebf8 ("bpf: Add hash of maps support")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

bpf_prog_size(prog->len) is not the correct length we want to dump
back to user space. The code in bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd() uses this
to copy prog->insnsi to user space, but bpf_prog_size(prog->len) also
includes the size of struct bpf_prog itself plus program instructions
and is usually used either in context of accounting or for bpf_prog_alloc()
et al, thus we copy out of bounds in bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd()
potentially. Use the correct bpf_prog_insn_size() instead.

Fixes: 1e2709769086 ("bpf: Add BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

err in bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd() still holds 0 at that time from prior
check_uarg_tail_zero() check. Explicitly return -EFAULT instead, so
user space can be notified of buggy behavior.

Fixes: 1e2709769086 ("bpf: Add BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We have to subtract the src max from the dst min, and vice-versa, since
 (e.g.) the smallest result comes from the largest subtrahend.

Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Pull networking fixes from David Miller:

 1) BPF verifier signed/unsigned value tracking fix, from Daniel
    Borkmann, Edward Cree, and Josef Bacik.

 2) Fix memory allocation length when setting up calls to
    ->ndo_set_mac_address, from Cong Wang.

 3) Add a new cxgb4 device ID, from Ganesh Goudar.

 4) Fix FIB refcount handling, we have to set it's initial value before
    the configure callback (which can bump it). From David Ahern.

 5) Fix double-free in qcom/emac driver, from Timur Tabi.

 6) A bunch of gcc-7 string format overflow warning fixes from Arnd
    Bergmann.

 7) Fix link level headroom tests in ip_do_fragment(), from Vasily
    Averin.

 8) Fix chunk walking in SCTP when iterating over error and parameter
    headers. From Alexander Potapenko.

 9) TCP BBR congestion control fixes from Neal Cardwell.

10) Fix SKB fragment handling in bcmgenet driver, from Doug Berger.

11) BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS needs to check for null __sk, from Cong
    Wang.

12) xmit_recursion in ppp driver needs to be per-device not per-cpu,
    from Gao Feng.

13) Cannot release skb->dst in UDP if IP options processing needs it.
    From Paolo Abeni.

14) Some netdev ioctl ifr_name[] NULL termination fixes. From Alexander
    Levin and myself.

15) Revert some rtnetlink notification changes that are causing
    regressions, from David Ahern.

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (83 commits)
  net: bonding: Fix transmit load balancing in balance-alb mode
  rds: Make sure updates to cp_send_gen can be observed
  net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Push the request_irq function to the end of probe
  ipv4: initialize fib_trie prior to register_netdev_notifier call.
  rtnetlink: allocate more memory for dev_set_mac_address()
  net: dsa: b53: Add missing ARL entries for BCM53125
  bpf: more tests for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks
  bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks
  bpf: fix up test cases with mixed signed/unsigned bounds
  bpf: allow to specify log level and reduce it for test_verifier
  bpf: fix mixed signed/unsigned derived min/max value bounds
  ipv6: avoid overflow of offset in ip6_find_1stfragopt
  net: tehuti: don't process data if it has not been copied from userspace
  Revert "rtnetlink: Do not generate notifications for CHANGEADDR event"
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable CMODE config support for 6390X
  dt-binding: ptp: Add SoC compatibility strings for dte ptp clock
  NET: dwmac: Make dwmac reset unconditional
  net: Zero terminate ifr_name in dev_ifname().
  wireless: wext: terminate ifr name coming from userspace
  netfilter: fix netfilter_net_init() return
  ...

Edward reported that there's an issue in min/max value bounds
tracking when signed and unsigned compares both provide hints
on limits when having unknown variables. E.g. a program such
as the following should have been rejected:

   0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
   1: (bf) r2 = r10
   2: (07) r2 += -8
   3: (18) r1 = 0xffff8a94cda93400
   5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
   6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+7
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
   7: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8
   8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)
   9: (b7) r2 = -1
  10: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+3
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0
  R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp
  11: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+2
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1
  R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp
  12: (0f) r0 += r1
  13: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +0) = 0
  R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=1 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1
  R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp
  14: (b7) r0 = 0
  15: (95) exit

What happens is that in the first part ...

   8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)
   9: (b7) r2 = -1
  10: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+3

... r1 carries an unsigned value, and is compared as unsigned
against a register carrying an immediate. Verifier deduces in
reg_set_min_max() that since the compare is unsigned and operation
is greater than (>), that in the fall-through/false case, r1's
minimum bound must be 0 and maximum bound must be r2. Latter is
larger than the bound and thus max value is reset back to being
'invalid' aka BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE. Thus, r1 state is now
'R1=inv,min_value=0'. The subsequent test ...

  11: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+2

... is a signed compare of r1 with immediate value 1. Here,
verifier deduces in reg_set_min_max() that since the compare
is signed this time and operation is greater than (>), that
in the fall-through/false case, we can deduce that r1's maximum
bound must be 1, meaning with prior test, we result in r1 having
the following state: R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1. Given that
the actual value this holds is -8, the bounds are wrongly deduced.
When this is being added to r0 which holds the map_value(_adj)
type, then subsequent store access in above case will go through
check_mem_access() which invokes check_map_access_adj(), that
will then probe whether the map memory is in bounds based
on the min_value and max_value as well as access size since
the actual unknown value is min_value <= x <= max_value; commit
fce366a9dd0d ("bpf, verifier: fix alu ops against map_value{,
_adj} register types") provides some more explanation on the
semantics.

It's worth to note in this context that in the current code,
min_value and max_value tracking are used for two things, i)
dynamic map value access via check_map_access_adj() and since
commit 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory")
ii) also enforced at check_helper_mem_access() when passing a
memory address (pointer to packet, map value, stack) and length
pair to a helper and the length in this case is an unknown value
defining an access range through min_value/max_value in that
case. The min_value/max_value tracking is /not/ used in the
direct packet access case to track ranges. However, the issue
also affects case ii), for example, the following crafted program
based on the same principle must be rejected as well:

   0: (b7) r2 = 0
   1: (bf) r3 = r10
   2: (07) r3 += -512
   3: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8
   4: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)
   5: (b7) r6 = -1
   6: (2d) if r4 > r6 goto pc+5
  R1=ctx R2=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0,min_align=2147483648 R3=fp-512
  R4=inv,min_value=0 R6=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp
   7: (65) if r4 s> 0x1 goto pc+4
  R1=ctx R2=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0,min_align=2147483648 R3=fp-512
  R4=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R6=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1
  R10=fp
   8: (07) r4 += 1
   9: (b7) r5 = 0
  10: (6a) *(u16 *)(r10 -512) = 0
  11: (85) call bpf_skb_load_bytes#26
  12: (b7) r0 = 0
  13: (95) exit

Meaning, while we initialize the max_value stack slot that the
verifier thinks we access in the [1,2] range, in reality we
pass -7 as length which is interpreted as u32 in the helper.
Thus, this issue is relevant also for the case of helper ranges.
Resetting both bounds in check_reg_overflow() in case only one
of them exceeds limits is also not enough as similar test can be
created that uses values which are within range, thus also here
learned min value in r1 is incorrect when mixed with later signed
test to create a range:

   0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
   1: (bf) r2 = r10
   2: (07) r2 += -8
   3: (18) r1 = 0xffff880ad081fa00
   5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
   6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+7
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
   7: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8
   8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)
   9: (b7) r2 = 2
  10: (3d) if r2 >= r1 goto pc+3
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3
  R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp
  11: (65) if r1 s> 0x4 goto pc+2
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0
  R1=inv,min_value=3,max_value=4 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp
  12: (0f) r0 += r1
  13: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +0) = 0
  R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=4
  R1=inv,min_value=3,max_value=4 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp
  14: (b7) r0 = 0
  15: (95) exit

This leaves us with two options for fixing this: i) to invalidate
all prior learned information once we switch signed context, ii)
to track min/max signed and unsigned boundaries separately as
done in [0]. (Given latter introduces major changes throughout
the whole verifier, it's rather net-next material, thus this
patch follows option i), meaning we can derive bounds either
from only signed tests or only unsigned tests.) There is still the
case of adjust_reg_min_max_vals(), where we adjust bounds on ALU
operations, meaning programs like the following where boundaries
on the reg get mixed in context later on when bounds are merged
on the dst reg must get rejected, too:

   0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
   1: (bf) r2 = r10
   2: (07) r2 += -8
   3: (18) r1 = 0xffff89b2bf87ce00
   5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
   6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+6
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
   7: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8
   8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)
   9: (b7) r2 = 2
  10: (3d) if r2 >= r1 goto pc+2
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3
  R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp
  11: (b7) r7 = 1
  12: (65) if r7 s> 0x0 goto pc+2
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3
  R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=imm1,max_value=0 R10=fp
  13: (b7) r0 = 0
  14: (95) exit

  from 12 to 15: R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0
  R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=imm1,min_value=1 R10=fp
  15: (0f) r7 += r1
  16: (65) if r7 s> 0x4 goto pc+2
  R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3
  R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=inv,min_value=4,max_value=4 R10=fp
  17: (0f) r0 += r7
  18: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +0) = 0
  R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=4,max_value=4 R1=inv,min_value=3
  R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=inv,min_value=4,max_value=4 R10=fp
  19: (b7) r0 = 0
  20: (95) exit

Meaning, in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() we must also reset range
values on the dst when src/dst registers have mixed signed/
unsigned derived min/max value bounds with one unbounded value
as otherwise they can be added together deducing false boundaries.
Once both boundaries are established from either ALU ops or
compare operations w/o mixing signed/unsigned insns, then they
can safely be added to other regs also having both boundaries
established. Adding regs with one unbounded side to a map value
where the bounded side has been learned w/o mixing ops is
possible, but the resulting map value won't recover from that,
meaning such op is considered invalid on the time of actual
access. Invalid bounds are set on the dst reg in case i) src reg,
or ii) in case dst reg already had them. The only way to recover
would be to perform i) ALU ops but only 'add' is allowed on map
value types or ii) comparisons, but these are disallowed on
pointers in case they span a range. This is fine as only BPF_JEQ
and BPF_JNE may be performed on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers
which potentially turn them into PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE type depending
on the branch, so only here min/max value cannot be invalidated
for them.

In terms of state pruning, value_from_signed is considered
as well in states_equal() when dealing with adjusted map values.
With regards to breaking existing programs, there is a small
risk, but use-cases are rather quite narrow where this could
occur and mixing compares probably unlikely.

Joint work with Josef and Edward.

  [0] https://lists.iovisor.org/pipermail/iovisor-dev/2017-June/000822.html

Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Reported-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Pull ->s_options removal from Al Viro:
 "Preparations for fsmount/fsopen stuff (coming next cycle). Everything
  gets moved to explicit ->show_options(), killing ->s_options off +
  some cosmetic bits around fs/namespace.c and friends. Basically, the
  stuff needed to work with fsmount series with minimum of conflicts
  with other work.

  It's not strictly required for this merge window, but it would reduce
  the PITA during the coming cycle, so it would be nice to have those
  bits and pieces out of the way"

* 'work.mount' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  isofs: Fix isofs_show_options()
  VFS: Kill off s_options and helpers
  orangefs: Implement show_options
  9p: Implement show_options
  isofs: Implement show_options
  afs: Implement show_options
  affs: Implement show_options
  befs: Implement show_options
  spufs: Implement show_options
  bpf: Implement show_options
  ramfs: Implement show_options
  pstore: Implement show_options
  omfs: Implement show_options
  hugetlbfs: Implement show_options
  VFS: Don't use save/replace_mount_options if not using generic_show_options
  VFS: Provide empty name qstr
  VFS: Make get_filesystem() return the affected filesystem
  VFS: Clean up whitespace in fs/namespace.c and fs/super.c
  Provide a function to create a NUL-terminated string from unterminated data

Implement the show_options superblock op for bpf as part of a bid to get
rid of s_options and generic_show_options() to make it easier to implement
a context-based mount where the mount options can be passed individually
over a file descriptor.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Pull memdup_user() conversions from Al Viro:
 "A fairly self-contained series - hunting down open-coded memdup_user()
  and memdup_user_nul() instances"

* 'work.memdup_user' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  bpf: don't open-code memdup_user()
  kimage_file_prepare_segments(): don't open-code memdup_user()
  ethtool: don't open-code memdup_user()
  do_ip_setsockopt(): don't open-code memdup_user()
  do_ipv6_setsockopt(): don't open-code memdup_user()
  irda: don't open-code memdup_user()
  xfrm_user_policy(): don't open-code memdup_user()
  ima_write_policy(): don't open-code memdup_user_nul()
  sel_write_validatetrans(): don't open-code memdup_user_nul()

Currently the verifier does not track imm across alu operations when
the source register is of unknown type. This adds additional pattern
matching to catch this and track imm. We've seen LLVM generating this
pattern while working on cilium.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>