Pull lsm updates from Paul Moore:
 "Thirteen patches, all focused on moving away from the current 'secid'
  LSM identifier to a richer 'lsm_prop' structure.

  This move will help reduce the translation that is necessary in many
  LSMs, offering better performance, and make it easier to support
  different LSMs in the future"

* tag 'lsm-pr-20241112' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm:
  lsm: remove lsm_prop scaffolding
  netlabel,smack: use lsm_prop for audit data
  audit: change context data from secid to lsm_prop
  lsm: create new security_cred_getlsmprop LSM hook
  audit: use an lsm_prop in audit_names
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_inode_getsecid
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_current_getsecid
  audit: update shutdown LSM data
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_ipc_getsecid
  audit: maintain an lsm_prop in audit_context
  lsm: add lsmprop_to_secctx hook
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_audit_rule_match
  lsm: add the lsm_prop data structure

Change the security_current_getsecid_subj() and
security_task_getsecid_obj() interfaces to fill in a lsm_prop structure
instead of a u32 secid.  Audit interfaces will need to collect all
possible security data for possible reporting.

Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: audit@vger.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[PM: subject line tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

The audit process LSM information is changed from a secid audit_sig_sid
to an lsm_prop in audit_sig_lsm. Update the users of this data
appropriately. Calls to security_secid_to_secctx() are changed to use
security_lsmprop_to_secctx() instead. security_current_getsecid_subj()
is scaffolded. It will be updated in a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[PM: subject line tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Reorganize kerneldoc parameter names to match the parameter
order in the function header.

Problems identified using Coccinelle.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Use str_enabled_disabled() helper instead of open
coding the same.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

In a few audit records, PIDs were being recorded with task_pid_nr()
instead of task_tgid_nr().

$ grep "task_pid_nr" kernel/audit*.c
audit.c:       task_pid_nr(current),
auditfilter.c: pid = task_pid_nr(current);
auditsc.c:     audit_log_format(ab, " pid=%u", task_pid_nr(current));

For single-thread applications, the process id (pid) and the thread
group id (tgid) are the same. However, on multi-thread applications,
task_pid_nr() returns the current thread id (user-space's TID), while
task_tgid_nr() returns the main thread id (user-space's PID). Since
the users are more interested in the process id (pid), rather than the
thread id (tid), this patch converts these callers to the correct method.

Link: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/126

Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.

Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
[PM: subject line tweaks]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

When auditd_set sets the auditd_conn pointer, audit messages can
immediately be put on the socket by other kernel threads. If the backlog
is large or the rate is high, this can immediately fill the socket
buffer. If the audit daemon requested an ACK for this operation, a full
socket buffer causes the ACK to get dropped, also setting ENOBUFS on the
socket.

To avoid this race and ensure ACKs get through, fast-track the ACK in
this specific case to ensure it is sent before auditd_conn is set.

Signed-off-by: Chris Riches <chris.riches@nutanix.com>
[PM: fix some tab vs space damage]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Fixes following checkpatch.pl issue:
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line

Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
[PM: subject line tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

The ifdef-else logic is already in the header file, so include it
unconditionally, no functional changes here.

Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
[PM: fixed misspelling in the subject]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>