Stefan reports that there are issues with the level triggered
notification. Since we're late in the cycle, and it was introduced for
the 6.0 release, just disable it at prep time and we can bring this
back when Samba is happy with it.

Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We need to make sure (at build time) that struct io_cmd_data is not
casted to a structure that's larger.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c024cdf25ae19fc0319d4180e2298bade8ed17b8.1660201408.git.metze@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

In preparation for adding limits, and one more user, abstract out the
core bits of the allocation+free cache.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

This is where it's used, move the flush handler in there.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Don't duplicate code disabling REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED for IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED
(i.e. io-wq), move the handling into __io_arm_poll_handler().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0ff0ffdfaa65b3d536131535c3dad3c63d9b7bb0.1657203020.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Instead of clearing REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED while arming a poll, unset the bit
when we're removing the entry from the table in io_poll_tw_hash_eject().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/02e48bb88d6f1480c94ac2924c43ad1fbd48e92a.1657203020.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Just as with io_poll_double_prepare() setting REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL, we can
race with the first poll entry when setting REQ_F_ASYNC_DATA. Move it
under io_poll_double_prepare().

Fixes: a18427bb2d9b ("io_uring: optimise submission side poll_refs")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/df6920f509c11115aa2bce8b34dc5fdb0eb98920.1657203020.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

When adding a second poll entry we should set REQ_F_DOUBLE_POLL
unconditionally. We might race with the first entry removal but that
doesn't change the rule.

Fixes: a18427bb2d9b ("io_uring: optimise submission side poll_refs")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+49950ba66096b1f0209b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8b680d83ded07424db83e8745585e7a6d72826ef.1657203020.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

On overflow, multishot poll can still complete with the IORING_CQE_F_MORE
flag set.
If in the meantime the user clears a CQE and a the poll was cancelled then
the poll will post a CQE without the IORING_CQE_F_MORE (and likely result
-ECANCELED).

However when processing the application will encounter the non-overflow
CQE which indicates that there will be no more events posted. Typical
userspace applications would free memory associated with the poll in this
case.
It will then subsequently receive the earlier CQE which has overflowed,
which breaks the contract given by the IORING_CQE_F_MORE flag.

Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220630091231.1456789-9-dylany@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Some use cases of io_post_aux_cqe would not want to overflow as is, but
might want to change the flags/result. For example multishot receive
requires in order CQE, and so if there is an overflow it would need to
stop receiving until the overflow is taken care of.

Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220630091231.1456789-8-dylany@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>