<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/include/linux/hrtimer_rearm.h, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>hrtimer: Push reprogramming timers into the interrupt return path</title>
<updated>2026-02-27T15:40:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Peter Zijlstra</name>
<email>peterz@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2026-02-24T16:38:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=15dd3a9488557d3e6ebcecacab79f4e56b69ab54'/>
<id>15dd3a9488557d3e6ebcecacab79f4e56b69ab54</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently hrtimer_interrupt() runs expired timers, which can re-arm
themselves, after which it computes the next expiration time and
re-programs the hardware.

However, things like HRTICK, a highres timer driving preemption, cannot
re-arm itself at the point of running, since the next task has not been
determined yet. The schedule() in the interrupt return path will switch to
the next task, which then causes a new hrtimer to be programmed.

This then results in reprogramming the hardware at least twice, once after
running the timers, and once upon selecting the new task.

Notably, *both* events happen in the interrupt.

By pushing the hrtimer reprogram all the way into the interrupt return
path, it runs after schedule() picks the new task and the double reprogram
can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260224163431.273488269@kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently hrtimer_interrupt() runs expired timers, which can re-arm
themselves, after which it computes the next expiration time and
re-programs the hardware.

However, things like HRTICK, a highres timer driving preemption, cannot
re-arm itself at the point of running, since the next task has not been
determined yet. The schedule() in the interrupt return path will switch to
the next task, which then causes a new hrtimer to be programmed.

This then results in reprogramming the hardware at least twice, once after
running the timers, and once upon selecting the new task.

Notably, *both* events happen in the interrupt.

By pushing the hrtimer reprogram all the way into the interrupt return
path, it runs after schedule() picks the new task and the double reprogram
can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260224163431.273488269@kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>hrtimer: Prepare stubs for deferred rearming</title>
<updated>2026-02-27T15:40:13+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Peter Zijlstra</name>
<email>peterz@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2026-02-24T16:37:58+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a43b4856bc039675165a50d9ef5f41b28520f0f4'/>
<id>a43b4856bc039675165a50d9ef5f41b28520f0f4</id>
<content type='text'>
The hrtimer interrupt expires timers and at the end of the interrupt it
rearms the clockevent device for the next expiring timer.

That's obviously correct, but in the case that a expired timer set
NEED_RESCHED the return from interrupt ends up in schedule(). If HRTICK is
enabled then schedule() will modify the hrtick timer, which causes another
reprogramming of the hardware.

That can be avoided by deferring the rearming to the return from interrupt
path and if the return results in a immediate schedule() invocation then it
can be deferred until the end of schedule().

To make this correct the affected code parts need to be made aware of this.

Provide empty stubs for the deferred rearming mechanism, so that the
relevant code changes for entry, softirq and scheduler can be split up into
separate changes independent of the actual enablement in the hrtimer code.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260224163431.000891171@kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The hrtimer interrupt expires timers and at the end of the interrupt it
rearms the clockevent device for the next expiring timer.

That's obviously correct, but in the case that a expired timer set
NEED_RESCHED the return from interrupt ends up in schedule(). If HRTICK is
enabled then schedule() will modify the hrtick timer, which causes another
reprogramming of the hardware.

That can be avoided by deferring the rearming to the return from interrupt
path and if the return results in a immediate schedule() invocation then it
can be deferred until the end of schedule().

To make this correct the affected code parts need to be made aware of this.

Provide empty stubs for the deferred rearming mechanism, so that the
relevant code changes for entry, softirq and scheduler can be split up into
separate changes independent of the actual enablement in the hrtimer code.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260224163431.000891171@kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
