... and get rid of a bunch of bugs in it.  Background:
the reason for path_mountpoint() is that umount() really doesn't
want attempts to revalidate the root of what it's trying to umount.
The thing we want to avoid actually happen from complete_walk();
solution was to do something parallel to normal path_lookupat()
and it both went overboard and got the boilerplate subtly
(and not so subtly) wrong.

A better solution is to do pretty much what the normal path_lookupat()
does, but instead of complete_walk() do unlazy_walk().  All it takes
to avoid that ->d_weak_revalidate() call...  mountpoint_last() goes
away, along with everything it got wrong, and so does the magic around
LOOKUP_NO_REVAL.

Another source of bugs is that when we traverse mounts at the final
location (and we need to do that - umount . expects to get whatever's
overmounting ., if any, out of the lookup) we really ought to take
care of ->d_manage() - as it is, manual umount of autofs automount
in progress can lead to unpleasant surprises for the daemon.  Easily
solved by using handle_lookup_down() instead of follow_mount().

Tested-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

One of the most frustrating messages our sustaining team sees is
the "Lock reclaim failed!" message. Add some observability in the
client's lock reclaim logic so we can capture better data the
first time a problem occurs.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Add a trace point in the main state manager loop to observe state
recovery operation. Help track down state recovery bugs.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Static analysis with Coverity detected a memory leak

Reported-by: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Fixes: ec4b09250898 ("NFS: inter ssc open")
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

This is triggering problems with static analysis with Coverity

Reported-by: Colin King <colin.king@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Remove duplicated include.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Fix sparse warning:

fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c:527:5: warning:
 symbol '_nfs42_proc_copy_notify' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Changing a sparse file could have an effect not only on the file size,
but also on the number of blocks used by the file in the underlying
filesystem. The server's cache_consistency_bitmap doesn't update the
SPACE_USED attribute, so let's switch to the nfs4_fattr_bitmap to catch
this update whenever we do an ALLOCATE or DEALLOCATE.

This patch fixes xfstests generic/568, which tests that fallocating an
unaligned range allocates all blocks touched by that range. Without this
patch, `stat` reports 0 bytes used immediately after the fallocate.
Adding a `sleep 5` to the test also catches the update, but it's better
to do so when we know something has changed.

Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

My understanding is that -EBUSY refers to the underlying device, and
that -ETXTBSY is used when attempting to access a file in use by the
kernel (like a swapfile). Changing this return code helps us pass
xfstests generic/569

Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Remove NULL check before kfree, NULL check is taken care
on kfree.

Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>