linux.git/fs/locks.c, branch v5.3

Merge tag 'nfsd-5.3' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux

2019-07-11T04:22:43+00:00

Pull nfsd updates from Bruce Fields:
 "Highlights:

   - Add a new /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/ directory which exposes some
     long-requested information about NFSv4 clients (like open files)
     and allows forced revocation of client state.

   - Replace the global duplicate reply cache by a cache per network
     namespace; previously, a request in one network namespace could
     incorrectly match an entry from another, though we haven't seen
     this in production. This is the last remaining container bug that
     I'm aware of; at this point you should be able to run separate
     nfsd's in each network namespace, each with their own set of
     exports, and everything should work.

   - Cleanup and modify lock code to show the pid of lockd as the owner
     of NLM locks. This is the correct version of the bugfix originally
     attempted in b8eee0e90f97 ("lockd: Show pid of lockd for remote
     locks")"

* tag 'nfsd-5.3' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux: (34 commits)
  nfsd: Make __get_nfsdfs_client() static
  nfsd: Make two functions static
  nfsd: Fix misuse of strlcpy
  sunrpc/cache: remove the exporting of cache_seq_next
  nfsd: decode implementation id
  nfsd: create xdr_netobj_dup helper
  nfsd: allow forced expiration of NFSv4 clients
  nfsd: create get_nfsdfs_clp helper
  nfsd4: show layout stateids
  nfsd: show lock and deleg stateids
  nfsd4: add file to display list of client's opens
  nfsd: add more information to client info file
  nfsd: escape high characters in binary data
  nfsd: copy client's address including port number to cl_addr
  nfsd4: add a client info file
  nfsd: make client/ directory names small ints
  nfsd: add nfsd/clients directory
  nfsd4: use reference count to free client
  nfsd: rename cl_refcount
  nfsd: persist nfsd filesystem across mounts
  ...

locks: Cleanup lm_compare_owner and lm_owner_key

2019-07-03T21:52:09+00:00

After the update to use nlm_lockowners for the NLM server, there are no
more users of lm_compare_owner and lm_owner_key.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington 
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease

2019-06-19T12:49:38+00:00

check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or
for write before allowing to take a write lease.  The check that was
implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has
several false positives.  For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an
extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on
the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written.

Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to
eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be
taken on an overlayfs file.

The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric
w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently
does not break a write lease.

This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when
CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already
defined.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

locks: Add trace_leases_conflict

2019-06-19T12:49:37+00:00

Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files

2019-05-21T08:50:45+00:00

Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:

 - Have no license information of any form

 - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
   initial scan/conversion to ignore the file

These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:

  GPL-2.0-only

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge tag 'nfsd-5.2' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux

2019-05-16T01:21:43+00:00

Pull nfsd updates from Bruce Fields:
 "This consists mostly of nfsd container work:

  Scott Mayhew revived an old api that communicates with a userspace
  daemon to manage some on-disk state that's used to track clients
  across server reboots. We've been using a usermode_helper upcall for
  that, but it's tough to run those with the right namespaces, so a
  daemon is much friendlier to container use cases.

  Trond fixed nfsd's handling of user credentials in user namespaces. He
  also contributed patches that allow containers to support different
  sets of NFS protocol versions.

  The only remaining container bug I'm aware of is that the NFS reply
  cache is shared between all containers. If anyone's aware of other
  gaps in our container support, let me know.

  The rest of this is miscellaneous bugfixes"

* tag 'nfsd-5.2' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux: (23 commits)
  nfsd: update callback done processing
  locks: move checks from locks_free_lock() to locks_release_private()
  nfsd: fh_drop_write in nfsd_unlink
  nfsd: allow fh_want_write to be called twice
  nfsd: knfsd must use the container user namespace
  SUNRPC: rsi_parse() should use the current user namespace
  SUNRPC: Fix the server AUTH_UNIX userspace mappings
  lockd: Pass the user cred from knfsd when starting the lockd server
  SUNRPC: Temporary sockets should inherit the cred from their parent
  SUNRPC: Cache the process user cred in the RPC server listener
  nfsd: Allow containers to set supported nfs versions
  nfsd: Add custom rpcbind callbacks for knfsd
  SUNRPC: Allow further customisation of RPC program registration
  SUNRPC: Clean up generic dispatcher code
  SUNRPC: Add a callback to initialise server requests
  SUNRPC/nfs: Fix return value for nfs4_callback_compound()
  nfsd: handle legacy client tracking records sent by nfsdcld
  nfsd: re-order client tracking method selection
  nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations when using nfsdcld
  nfsd: un-deprecate nfsdcld
  ...

Merge tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux

2019-05-07T19:48:10+00:00

Pull Wimplicit-fallthrough updates from Gustavo A. R. Silva:
 "Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

  This is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.

  Most of them have been baking in linux-next for a whole development
  cycle. And with Stephen Rothwell's help, we've had linux-next
  nag-emails going out for newly introduced code that triggers
  -Wimplicit-fallthrough to avoid gaining more of these cases while we
  work to remove the ones that are already present.

  We are getting close to completing this work. Currently, there are
  only 32 of 2311 of these cases left to be addressed in linux-next. I'm
  auditing every case; I take a look into the code and analyze it in
  order to determine if I'm dealing with an actual bug or a false
  positive, as explained here:

      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c2fad584-1705-a5f2-d63c-824e9b96cf50@embeddedor.com/

  While working on this, I've found and fixed the several missing
  break/return bugs, some of them introduced more than 5 years ago.

  Once this work is finished, we'll be able to universally enable
  "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to avoid any of these kinds of bugs from
  entering the kernel again"

* tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (27 commits)
  memstick: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  drm/nouveau/nvkm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  NFC: st21nfca: Fix fall-through warnings
  NFC: pn533: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  ASN.1: mark expected switch fall-through
  lib/cmdline.c: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  lib: zstd: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_nvram: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_hipd: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: ppa: mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: osst: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_nvme: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_nportdisc: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_hbadisc: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_els: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_ct: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: imm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: csiostor: csio_wr: mark expected switch fall-through
  ...

locks: move checks from locks_free_lock() to locks_release_private()

2019-04-24T13:51:48+00:00

Code that allocates locks using locks_alloc_lock() will free it
using locks_free_lock(), and will benefit from the BUG_ON()
consistency checks therein.

However some code (nfsd and lockd) allocate a lock embedded in
some other data structure, and so free the lock themselves after
calling locks_release_private().  This path does not benefit from
the consistency checks.

To help catch future errors, move the BUG_ON() checks to
locks_release_private() - which locks_free_lock() already calls.
This ensures that all users for locks will find out if the lock
isn't detached properly before being free.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs

2019-04-08T23:21:02+00:00

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook 
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva

locks: wake any locks blocked on request before deadlock check

2019-03-25T12:36:24+00:00

Andreas reported that he was seeing the tdbtorture test fail in some
cases with -EDEADLCK when it wasn't before. Some debugging showed that
deadlock detection was sometimes discovering the caller's lock request
itself in a dependency chain.

While we remove the request from the blocked_lock_hash prior to
reattempting to acquire it, any locks that are blocked on that request
will still be present in the hash and will still have their fl_blocker
pointer set to the current request.

This causes posix_locks_deadlock to find a deadlock dependency chain
when it shouldn't, as a lock request cannot block itself.

We are going to end up waking all of those blocked locks anyway when we
go to reinsert the request back into the blocked_lock_hash, so just do
it prior to checking for deadlocks. This ensures that any lock blocked
on the current request will no longer be part of any blocked request
chain.

URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202975
Fixes: 5946c4319ebb ("fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Andreas Schneider 
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton