* 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (61 commits)
  jbd2: Add MAINTAINERS entry
  jbd2: fix a potential leak of a journal_head on an error path
  ext4: teach ext4_ext_split to calculate extents efficiently
  ext4: Convert ext4 to new truncate calling convention
  ext4: do not normalize block requests from fallocate()
  ext4: enable "punch hole" functionality
  ext4: add "punch hole" flag to ext4_map_blocks()
  ext4: punch out extents
  ext4: add new function ext4_block_zero_page_range()
  ext4: add flag to ext4_has_free_blocks
  ext4: reserve inodes and feature code for 'quota' feature
  ext4: add support for multiple mount protection
  ext4: ensure f_bfree returned by ext4_statfs() is non-negative
  ext4: protect bb_first_free in ext4_trim_all_free() with group lock
  ext4: only load buddy bitmap in ext4_trim_fs() when it is needed
  jbd2: Fix comment to match the code in jbd2__journal_start()
  ext4: fix waiting and sending of a barrier in ext4_sync_file()
  jbd2: Add function jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier()
  jbd2: fix sending of data flush on journal commit
  ext4: fix ext4_ext_fiemap_cb() to handle blocks before request range correctly
  ...

Provide a function which returns whether a transaction with given tid
will send a flush to the filesystem device.  The function will be used
by ext4 to detect whether fsync needs to send a separate flush or not.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

In data=ordered mode, it's theoretically possible (however rare) that
an inode is filed to transaction's t_inode_list and a flusher thread
writes all the data and inode is reclaimed before the transaction
starts to commit.  In such a case, we could erroneously omit sending a
flush to file system device when it is different from the journal
device (because data can still be in disk cache only).

Fix the problem by setting a flag in a transaction when some inode is added
to it and then send disk flush in the commit code when the flag is set.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

summarise_journal_usage seems to be obsolete for a long time,
so remove it.

Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

In do_get_write_access() we wait on BH_Unshadow bit for buffer to get
from shadow state. The waking code in journal_commit_transaction() has
a bug because it does not issue a memory barrier after the buffer is
moved from the shadow state and before wake_up_bit() is called. Thus a
waitqueue check can happen before the buffer is actually moved from
the shadow state and waiting process may never be woken. Fix the
problem by issuing proper barrier.

Reported-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

* 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: fix data corruption regression by reverting commit 6de9843dab3f
  ext4: Allow indirect-block file to grow the file size to max file size
  ext4: allow an active handle to be started when freezing
  ext4: sync the directory inode in ext4_sync_parent()
  ext4: init timer earlier to avoid a kernel panic in __save_error_info
  jbd2: fix potential memory leak on transaction commit
  ext4: fix a double free in ext4_register_li_request
  ext4: fix credits computing for indirect mapped files
  ext4: remove unnecessary [cm]time update of quota file
  jbd2: move bdget out of critical section

There is potential memory leak of journal head in function
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction. The problem is that JBD2 will not
reclaim the journal head of commit record if error occurs or journal
is abotred.

I use the following script to reproduce this issue, on a RHEL6
system. I found it very easy to reproduce with async commit enabled.

mount /dev/sdb /mnt -o journal_checksum,journal_async_commit
touch /mnt/xxx
echo offline > /sys/block/sdb/device/state
sync
umount /mnt
rmmod ext4
rmmod jbd2

Removal of the jbd2 module will make slab complaining that
"cache `jbd2_journal_head': can't free all objects".

Signed-off-by: Zhang Huan <zhhuan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>

'write_op' was still used, even though it was always WRITE_SYNC now.
Add plugging around the cases where it submits IO, and flush them
before we end up waiting for that IO.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

With the plugging now being explicitly controlled by the
submitter, callers need not pass down unplugging hints
to the block layer. If they want to unplug, it's because they
manually plugged on their own - in which case, they should just
unplug at will.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>