linux.git/fs/jbd/commit.c, branch v2.6.14 Linux kernel source tree [PATCH] Change ll_rw_block() calls in JBD 2005-09-07T23:57:55+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2005-09-06T22:19:12+00:00 26707699b5337ea471ba1774447e8a1170c99e52 We must be sure that the current data in buffer are sent to disk. Hence we have to call ll_rw_block() with SWRITE. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> 
We must be sure that the current data in buffer are sent to disk.  Hence we
have to call ll_rw_block() with SWRITE.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Fix JBD race in t_forget list handling 2005-09-07T23:57:54+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2005-09-06T22:19:09+00:00 e6c9f5c1888097c936334bf9740024520ca47b8e Fix race between journal_commit_transaction() and other places as journal_unmap_buffer() that are adding buffers to transaction's t_forget list. We have to protect against such places by holding j_list_lock even when traversing the t_forget list. The fact that other places can only add buffers to the list makes the locking easier. OTOH the lock ranking complicates the stuff... Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> 
Fix race between journal_commit_transaction() and other places as
journal_unmap_buffer() that are adding buffers to transaction's t_forget list.
 We have to protect against such places by holding j_list_lock even when
traversing the t_forget list.  The fact that other places can only add buffers
to the list makes the locking easier.  OTOH the lock ranking complicates the
stuff...

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org 2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip! 
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!