Pull fuse update from Miklos Szeredi:
 "The first part makes sure we don't hold up umount with pending async
  requests.  In addition to being a cleanup, this is a small behavioral
  change (for the better) and unlikely to break anything.

  The second part prepares for a cleanup of the fuse device I/O code by
  adding a helper for simple request submission, with some savings in
  line numbers already realized"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse:
  fuse: use file_inode() in fuse_file_fallocate()
  fuse: introduce fuse_simple_request() helper
  fuse: reduce max out args
  fuse: hold inode instead of path after release
  fuse: flush requests on umount
  fuse: don't wake up reserved req in fuse_conn_kill()

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

The following pattern is repeated many times:

	req = fuse_get_req_nopages(fc);
	/* Initialize req->(in|out).args */
	fuse_request_send(fc, req);
	err = req->out.h.error;
	fuse_put_request(req);

Create a new replacement helper:

	/* Initialize args */
	err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);

In addition to reducing the code size, this will ease moving from the
complex arg-based to a simpler page-based I/O on the fuse device.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

The third out-arg is never actually used.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

path_put() in release could trigger a DESTROY request in fuseblk.  The
possible deadlock was worked around by doing the path_put() with
schedule_work().

This complexity isn't needed if we just hold the inode instead of the path.
Since we now flush all requests before destroying the super block we can be
sure that all held inodes will be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Use fuse_abort_conn() instead of fuse_conn_kill() in fuse_put_super().
This flushes and aborts requests still on any queues.  But since we've
already reset fc->connected, those requests would not be useful anyway and
would be flushed when the fuse device is closed.

Next patches will rely on requests being flushed before the superblock is
destroyed.

Use fuse_abort_conn() in cuse_process_init_reply() too, since it makes no
difference there, and we can get rid of fuse_conn_kill().

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Waking up reserved_req_waitq from fuse_conn_kill() doesn't make sense since
we aren't chaging ff->reserved_req here, which is what this waitqueue
signals.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Now that d_invalidate can no longer fail, stop returning a useless
return code.  For the few callers that checked the return code update
remove the handling of d_invalidate failure.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>