linux.git/fs/fuse, branch v3.1-rc2

Merge branch 'for-3.1' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux

2011-07-26T05:49:19+00:00

* 'for-3.1' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
  nfsd: don't break lease on CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR
  locks: rename lock-manager ops
  nfsd4: update nfsv4.1 implementation notes
  nfsd: turn on reply cache for NFSv4
  nfsd4: call nfsd4_release_compoundargs from pc_release
  nfsd41: Deny new lock before RECLAIM_COMPLETE done
  fs: locks: remove init_once
  nfsd41: check the size of request
  nfsd41: error out when client sets maxreq_sz or maxresp_sz too small
  nfsd4: fix file leak on open_downgrade
  nfsd4: remember to put RW access on stateid destruction
  NFSD: Added TEST_STATEID operation
  NFSD: added FREE_STATEID operation
  svcrpc: fix list-corrupting race on nfsd shutdown
  rpc: allow autoloading of gss mechanisms
  svcauth_unix.c: quiet sparse noise
  svcsock.c: include sunrpc.h to quiet sparse noise
  nfsd: Remove deprecated nfsctl system call and related code.
  NFSD: allow OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID to be only op in COMPOUND

Fix up trivial conflicts in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt

fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers

2011-07-21T00:47:59+00:00

Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
Thanks,

Acked-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fs: handle SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA properly in all fs's that define their own llseek

2011-07-21T00:47:58+00:00

This converts everybody to handle SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA properly.  In some cases
we just return -EINVAL, in others we do the normal generic thing, and in others
we're simply making sure that the properly due-dilligence is done.  For example
in NFS/CIFS we need to make sure the file size is update properly for the
SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA case, but since it calls the generic llseek stuff itself
that is all we have to do.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

locks: rename lock-manager ops

2011-07-21T00:23:19+00:00

Both the filesystem and the lock manager can associate operations with a
lock.  Confusingly, one of them (fl_release_private) actually has the
same name in both operation structures.

It would save some confusion to give the lock-manager ops different
names.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

no need to check for LOOKUP_OPEN in ->create() instances

2011-07-20T05:43:56+00:00

... it will be set in nd->flag for all cases with non-NULL nd
(i.e. when called from do_last()).

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

don't transliterate lower bits of ->intent.open.flags to FMODE_...

2011-07-20T05:43:52+00:00

->create() instances are much happier that way...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()

2011-07-20T05:43:24+00:00

not used by the instances anymore.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to generic_permission()

2011-07-20T05:43:22+00:00

redundant; all callers get it duplicated in mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK and none of
them removes that bit.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

kill check_acl callback of generic_permission()

2011-07-20T05:43:16+00:00

its value depends only on inode and does not change; we might as
well store it in ->i_op->check_acl and be done with that.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

more conservative S_NOSEC handling

2011-06-03T22:24:58+00:00

Caching "we have already removed suid/caps" was overenthusiastic as merged.
On network filesystems we might have had suid/caps set on another client,
silently picked by this client on revalidate, all of that *without* clearing
the S_NOSEC flag.

AFAICS, the only reasonably sane way to deal with that is
	* new superblock flag; unless set, S_NOSEC is not going to be set.
	* local block filesystems set it in their ->mount() (more accurately,
mount_bdev() does, so does btrfs ->mount(), users of mount_bdev() other than
local block ones clear it)
	* if any network filesystem (or a cluster one) wants to use S_NOSEC,
it'll need to set MS_NOSEC in sb->s_flags *AND* take care to clear S_NOSEC when
inode attribute changes are picked from other clients.

It's not an earth-shattering hole (anybody that can set suid on another client
will almost certainly be able to write to the file before doing that anyway),
but it's a bug that needs fixing.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro