linux.git/fs/f2fs/segment.h, branch v4.18 Linux kernel source tree f2fs: fix to update mtime correctly 2018-06-04T21:31:11+00:00 Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com 2018-06-04T15:20:17+00:00 a1f72ac2c0a8d8a3488b31867c9255264331a4db If we change system time to the past, get_mtime() will return a overflowed time, and SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime will be udpated incorrectly, this patch fixes the two issues. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
If we change system time to the past, get_mtime() will return a
overflowed time, and SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime will be udpated
incorrectly, this patch fixes the two issues.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: avoid stucking GC due to atomic write 2018-05-31T18:31:51+00:00 Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com 2018-05-07T12:28:54+00:00 2ef79ecb5e906d87475d3e0c49b22425499a89f3 f2fs doesn't allow abuse on atomic write class interface, so except limiting in-mem pages' total memory usage capacity, we need to limit atomic-write usage as well when filesystem is seriously fragmented, otherwise we may run into infinite loop during foreground GC because target blocks in victim segment are belong to atomic opened file for long time. Now, we will detect failure due to atomic write in foreground GC, if the count exceeds threshold, we will drop all atomic written data in cache, by this, I expect it can keep our system running safely to prevent Dos attack. In addition, his patch adds to show GC skip information in debugfs, now it just shows count of skipped caused by atomic write. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
f2fs doesn't allow abuse on atomic write class interface, so except
limiting in-mem pages' total memory usage capacity, we need to limit
atomic-write usage as well when filesystem is seriously fragmented,
otherwise we may run into infinite loop during foreground GC because
target blocks in victim segment are belong to atomic opened file for
long time.

Now, we will detect failure due to atomic write in foreground GC, if
the count exceeds threshold, we will drop all atomic written data in
cache, by this, I expect it can keep our system running safely to
prevent Dos attack.

In addition, his patch adds to show GC skip information in debugfs,
now it just shows count of skipped caused by atomic write.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: clean up with is_valid_blkaddr() 2018-05-31T18:31:50+00:00 Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com 2018-05-23T14:25:08+00:00 7b525dd01365c6764018e374d391c92466be1b7a - rename is_valid_blkaddr() to is_valid_meta_blkaddr() for readability. - introduce is_valid_blkaddr() for cleanup. No logic change in this patch. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
- rename is_valid_blkaddr() to is_valid_meta_blkaddr() for readability.
- introduce is_valid_blkaddr() for cleanup.

No logic change in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Revert "f2fs: add ovp valid_blocks check for bg gc victim to fg_gc" 2018-05-31T18:31:50+00:00 Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com 2018-04-26T09:05:51+00:00 299254d85dec4ac0515a14e6d96ff70841302719 For extreme case: 10 section, op = 10%, no_fggc_threshold = 90% All section usage: 85% 85% 85% 85% 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95% During foreground GC, if we skip select dirty section whose usage is larger than no_fggc_threshold, we can only recycle 80% invalid space from four 85% usage sections and two 90% usage sections, result in encountering out-of-space issue. This reverts commit e93b9865251a0503d83fd570e7d5a7c8bc351715 to fix this issue, besides, we keep the logic that we scan all dirty section when searching a victim, so that GC can select victim with least valid blocks. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
For extreme case:
10 section, op = 10%, no_fggc_threshold = 90%
All section usage: 85% 85% 85% 85% 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95%

During foreground GC, if we skip select dirty section whose usage
is larger than no_fggc_threshold, we can only recycle 80% invalid
space from four 85% usage sections and two 90% usage sections,
result in encountering out-of-space issue.

This reverts commit e93b9865251a0503d83fd570e7d5a7c8bc351715 to
fix this issue, besides, we keep the logic that we scan all dirty
section when searching a victim, so that GC can select victim with
least valid blocks.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: don't use GFP_ZERO for page caches 2018-05-31T18:31:45+00:00 Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com 2018-04-09T12:25:06+00:00 81114baa835b59ed02d14aa1d67f91ea874077cd Related to https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/8/661 Sometimes, we need to write meta data to new allocated block address, then we will allocate a zeroed page in inner inode's address space, and fill partial data in it, and leave other place with zero value which means some fields are initial status. There are two inner inodes (meta inode and node inode) setting __GFP_ZERO, I have just checked them, for both of them, we can avoid using __GFP_ZERO, and do initialization by ourselves to avoid unneeded/redundant zeroing from mm. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
Related to https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/8/661

Sometimes, we need to write meta data to new allocated block address,
then we will allocate a zeroed page in inner inode's address space, and
fill partial data in it, and leave other place with zero value which means
some fields are initial status.

There are two inner inodes (meta inode and node inode) setting __GFP_ZERO,
I have just checked them, for both of them, we can avoid using __GFP_ZERO,
and do initialization by ourselves to avoid unneeded/redundant zeroing
from mm.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: check blkaddr more accuratly before issue a bio 2018-03-19T06:33:50+00:00 Yunlei He heyunlei@huawei.com 2018-03-08T08:29:13+00:00 0833721ec3658a4e9d5e58b6fa82cf9edc431e59 This patch check blkaddr more accuratly before issue a write or read bio. Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
This patch check blkaddr more accuratly before issue a
write or read bio.

Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: add auto tuning for small devices 2018-03-12T23:05:51+00:00 Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org 2018-02-22T22:09:30+00:00 84b89e5d943d8d6b997fcebb4609373e1b3e4b03 If f2fs is running on top of very small devices, it's worth to avoid abusing free LBAs. In order to achieve that, this patch introduces some parameter tuning. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
If f2fs is running on top of very small devices, it's worth to avoid abusing
free LBAs. In order to achieve that, this patch introduces some parameter
tuning.

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: rebuild sit page from sit info in mem 2018-01-25T18:44:34+00:00 Yunlei He heyunlei@huawei.com 2018-01-25T09:27:11+00:00 068c3cd85866785303f18960a4c00a182515b963 This patch rebuild sit page from sit info in mem instead of issue a read io. I test this method and the result is as below: Pre: mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1 976.819992: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1 976.856446: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 998.976946: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 999.023269: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1022.060772: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1022.111034: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1 1070.127643: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1070.187352: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1095.942124: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1095.995975: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1122.535091: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1122.586521: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1 1147.897487: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1 1147.959438: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1 1177.926951: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1 1177.976823: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1 1204.176087: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1 1204.239046: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit Some sit flush consume more than 50ms. Now: mmc_perf_test-2187 [007] ...1 196.840684: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [007] ...1 196.841258: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [007] ...1 219.430582: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [007] ...1 219.431144: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [002] ...1 243.638678: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [000] ...1 243.638980: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [002] ...1 265.392180: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [002] ...1 265.392245: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [000] ...1 290.309051: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [000] ...1 290.309116: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [003] ...1 317.144209: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [003] ...1 317.145913: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [005] ...1 343.224954: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [005] ...1 343.225574: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [000] ...1 370.239846: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [000] ...1 370.241138: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [001] ...1 397.029043: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [001] ...1 397.030750: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [003] ...1 425.386377: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit mmc_perf_test-2187 [003] ...1 425.387735: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit Most sit flush consume no more than 1ms. Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
This patch rebuild sit page from sit info in mem instead
of issue a read io.

I test this method and the result is as below:

Pre:
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1   976.819992: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1   976.856446: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1   998.976946: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1   999.023269: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1022.060772: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1022.111034: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1  1070.127643: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1070.187352: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1095.942124: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1095.995975: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1122.535091: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1122.586521: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1  1147.897487: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [001] ...1  1147.959438: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [003] ...1  1177.926951: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1  1177.976823: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1  1204.176087: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
 mmc_perf_test-12061 [002] ...1  1204.239046: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit

Some sit flush consume more than 50ms.

Now:
mmc_perf_test-2187  [007] ...1   196.840684: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [007] ...1   196.841258: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [007] ...1   219.430582: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [007] ...1   219.431144: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [002] ...1   243.638678: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [000] ...1   243.638980: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [002] ...1   265.392180: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [002] ...1   265.392245: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [000] ...1   290.309051: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [000] ...1   290.309116: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [003] ...1   317.144209: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [003] ...1   317.145913: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [005] ...1   343.224954: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [005] ...1   343.225574: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [000] ...1   370.239846: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [000] ...1   370.241138: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [001] ...1   397.029043: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [001] ...1   397.030750: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [003] ...1   425.386377: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start flush sit
mmc_perf_test-2187  [003] ...1   425.387735: f2fs_write_checkpoint: dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = end flush sit

Most sit flush consume no more than 1ms.

Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: split need_inplace_update 2018-01-22T22:56:53+00:00 Chao Yu yuchao0@huawei.com 2018-01-17T08:31:38+00:00 bb9e3bb8dbf5975a493e4e2dfbb900018579890c This patch splits need_inplace_update to two functions: a. should_update_inplace() includes all conditions that we must use IPU. b. should_update_outplace() includes all conditions that we must use OPU. So that, in f2fs_ioc_set_pin_file() and f2fs_defragment_range(), we can use corresponding function to check whether we can trigger OPU/IPU or not. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
This patch splits need_inplace_update to two functions:
a. should_update_inplace() includes all conditions that we must use IPU.
b. should_update_outplace() includes all conditions that we must use OPU.

So that, in f2fs_ioc_set_pin_file() and f2fs_defragment_range(), we can
use corresponding function to check whether we can trigger OPU/IPU or not.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
f2fs: return error during fill_super 2018-01-03T03:27:31+00:00 Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org 2017-12-20T03:16:34+00:00 c39a1b348c4fe172729eff77c533dabc3c7cdaa7 Let's avoid BUG_ON during fill_super, when on-disk was totall corrupted. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> 
Let's avoid BUG_ON during fill_super, when on-disk was totall corrupted.

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>