Fixes: 0813299c586b ("ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5efbe1b9-ad8b-4a4f-b422-24824d2b775c@kili.mountain
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+0c73d1d8b952c5f3d714@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "Bug fixes and regressions for ext4, the most serious of which is a
  potential deadlock during directory renames that was introduced during
  the merge window discovered by a combination of syzbot and lockdep"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: zero i_disksize when initializing the bootloader inode
  ext4: make sure fs error flag setted before clear journal error
  ext4: commit super block if fs record error when journal record without error
  ext4, jbd2: add an optimized bmap for the journal inode
  ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_update_inline_data
  ext4: move where set the MAY_INLINE_DATA flag is set
  ext4: Fix deadlock during directory rename
  ext4: Fix comment about the 64BIT feature
  docs: ext4: modify the group desc size to 64
  ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems
  ext4: fix RENAME_WHITEOUT handling for inline directories
  ext4: make kobj_type structures constant
  ext4: fix cgroup writeback accounting with fs-layer encryption

If the boot loader inode has never been used before, the
EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT inode will initialize it, including setting the
i_size to 0.  However, if the "never before used" boot loader has a
non-zero i_size, then i_disksize will be non-zero, and the
inconsistency between i_size and i_disksize can trigger a kernel
warning:

 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2580 at fs/ext4/file.c:319
 CPU: 0 PID: 2580 Comm: bb Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-00004-g703695902cfa
 RIP: 0010:ext4_file_write_iter+0xbc7/0xd10
 Call Trace:
  vfs_write+0x3b1/0x5c0
  ksys_write+0x77/0x160
  __x64_sys_write+0x22/0x30
  do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80

Reproducer:
 1. create corrupted image and mount it:
       mke2fs -t ext4 /tmp/foo.img 200
       debugfs -wR "sif <5> size 25700" /tmp/foo.img
       mount -t ext4 /tmp/foo.img /mnt
       cd /mnt
       echo 123 > file
 2. Run the reproducer program:
       posix_memalign(&buf, 1024, 1024)
       fd = open("file", O_RDWR | O_DIRECT);
       ioctl(fd, EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT);
       write(fd, buf, 1024);

Fix this by setting i_disksize as well as i_size to zero when
initiaizing the boot loader inode.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217159
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308032643.641113-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Now, jounral error number maybe cleared even though ext4_commit_super()
failed. This may lead to error flag miss, then fsck will miss to check
file system deeply.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307061703.245965-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com

Now, 'es->s_state' maybe covered by recover journal. And journal errno
maybe not recorded in journal sb as IO error. ext4_update_super() only
update error information when 'sbi->s_add_error_count' large than zero.
Then 'EXT4_ERROR_FS' flag maybe lost.
To solve above issue just recover 'es->s_state' error flag after journal
replay like error info.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307061703.245965-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com

The generic bmap() function exported by the VFS takes locks and does
checks that are not necessary for the journal inode.  So allow the
file system to set a journal-optimized bmap function in
journal->j_bmap.

Reported-by: syzbot+9543479984ae9e576000@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=e4aaa78795e490421c79f76ec3679006c8ff4cf0
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Syzbot found the following issue:
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 without journal. Quota mode: none.
fscrypt: AES-256-CTS-CBC using implementation "cts-cbc-aes-aesni"
fscrypt: AES-256-XTS using implementation "xts-aes-aesni"
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5071 at mm/page_alloc.c:5525 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5525
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 5071 Comm: syz-executor263 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5525
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003c2f1c0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffffc90003c2f220 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003c2f248
RBP: ffffc90003c2f2d8 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003c2f220
R10: fffff52000785e49 R11: 1ffff92000785e44 R12: 0000000000040d40
R13: 1ffff92000785e40 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000785e3c
FS:  0000555556c0d300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f95d5e04138 CR3: 00000000793aa000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:237 [inline]
 alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:260 [inline]
 __kmalloc_large_node+0x95/0x1e0 mm/slab_common.c:1113
 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:956 [inline]
 __kmalloc+0xfe/0x190 mm/slab_common.c:981
 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:584 [inline]
 kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:720 [inline]
 ext4_update_inline_data+0x236/0x6b0 fs/ext4/inline.c:346
 ext4_update_inline_dir fs/ext4/inline.c:1115 [inline]
 ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x328/0x990 fs/ext4/inline.c:1307
 ext4_add_entry+0x5a4/0xeb0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2385
 ext4_add_nondir+0x96/0x260 fs/ext4/namei.c:2772
 ext4_create+0x36c/0x560 fs/ext4/namei.c:2817
 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
 open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
 path_openat+0x12ac/0x2dd0 fs/namei.c:3711
 do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3741
 do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
 __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1342 [inline]
 __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1337 [inline]
 __x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1337
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue happens as follows:
ext4_iget
   ext4_find_inline_data_nolock ->i_inline_off=164 i_inline_size=60
ext4_try_add_inline_entry
   __ext4_mark_inode_dirty
      ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea ->i_extra_isize=32 s_want_extra_isize=44
         ext4_xattr_shift_entries
	 ->after shift i_inline_off is incorrect, actually is change to 176
ext4_try_add_inline_entry
  ext4_update_inline_dir
    get_max_inline_xattr_value_size
      if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off)
	entry = (struct ext4_xattr_entry *)((void *)raw_inode +
			EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off);
        free += EXT4_XATTR_SIZE(le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_size));
	->As entry is incorrect, then 'free' may be negative
   ext4_update_inline_data
      value = kzalloc(len, GFP_NOFS);
      -> len is unsigned int, maybe very large, then trigger warning when
         'kzalloc()'

To resolve the above issue we need to update 'i_inline_off' after
'ext4_xattr_shift_entries()'.  We do not need to set
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag here, since ext4_mark_inode_dirty()
already sets this flag if needed.  Setting EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA
when it is needed may trigger a BUG_ON in ext4_writepages().

Reported-by: syzbot+d30838395804afc2fa6f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307015253.2232062-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The only caller of ext4_find_inline_data_nolock() that needs setting of
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag is ext4_iget_extra_inode().  In
ext4_write_inline_data_end() we just need to update inode->i_inline_off.
Since we are going to add one more caller that does not need to set
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA, just move setting of EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA
out to ext4_iget_extra_inode().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307015253.2232062-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

As lockdep properly warns, we should not be locking i_rwsem while having
transactions started as the proper lock ordering used by all directory
handling operations is i_rwsem -> transaction start. Fix the lock
ordering by moving the locking of the directory earlier in
ext4_rename().

Reported-by: syzbot+9d16c39efb5fade84574@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0813299c586b ("ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory")
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9d16c39efb5fade84574
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301141004.15087-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

64BIT is part of the incompatible feature set, update the comment
accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301133842.671821-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>