As Al pointed, d_revalidate should return RCU lookup before using d_inode.
This was originally introduced by:
commit 34286d666230 ("fs: rcu-walk aware d_revalidate method").

Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>

This reverts commit 1028b55bafb7611dda1d8fed2aeca16a436b7dff.

It's broken: it makes ext4 return an error at an invalid point, causing
the readdir wrappers to write the the position of the last successful
directory entry into the position field, which means that the next
readdir will now return that last successful entry _again_.

You can only return fatal errors (that terminate the readdir directory
walk) from within the filesystem readdir functions, the "normal" errors
(that happen when the readdir buffer fills up, for example) happen in
the iterorator where we know the position of the actual failing entry.

I do have a very different patch that does the "signal_pending()"
handling inside the iterator function where it is allowable, but while
that one passes all the sanity checks, I screwed up something like four
times while emailing it out, so I'm not going to commit it today.

So my track record is not good enough, and the stars will have to align
better before that one gets committed.  And it would be good to get some
review too, of course, since celestial alignments are always an iffy
debugging model.

IOW, let's just revert the commit that caused the problem for now.

Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pull ext4 bugfixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "These changes contains a fix for overlayfs interacting with some
  (badly behaved) dentry code in various file systems.  These have been
  reviewed by Al and the respective file system mtinainers and are going
  through the ext4 tree for convenience.

  This also has a few ext4 encryption bug fixes that were discovered in
  Android testing (yes, we will need to get these sync'ed up with the
  fs/crypto code; I'll take care of that).  It also has some bug fixes
  and a change to ignore the legacy quota options to allow for xfstests
  regression testing of ext4's internal quota feature and to be more
  consistent with how xfs handles this case"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: ignore quota mount options if the quota feature is enabled
  ext4 crypto: fix some error handling
  ext4: avoid calling dquot_get_next_id() if quota is not enabled
  ext4: retry block allocation for failed DIO and DAX writes
  ext4: add lockdep annotations for i_data_sem
  ext4: allow readdir()'s of large empty directories to be interrupted
  btrfs: fix crash/invalid memory access on fsync when using overlayfs
  ext4 crypto: use dget_parent() in ext4_d_revalidate()
  ext4: use file_dentry()
  ext4: use dget_parent() in ext4_file_open()
  nfs: use file_dentry()
  fs: add file_dentry()
  ext4 crypto: don't let data integrity writebacks fail with ENOMEM
  ext4: check if in-inode xattr is corrupted in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea()

Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
outdated comments.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Previously, ext4 would fail the mount if the file system had the quota
feature enabled and quota mount options (used for the older quota
setups) were present.  This broke xfstests, since xfs silently ignores
the usrquote and grpquota mount options if they are specified.  This
commit changes things so that we are consistent with xfs; having the
mount options specified is harmless, so no sense break users by
forbidding them.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We should be testing for -ENOMEM but the minus sign is missing.

Fixes: c9af28fdd449 ('ext4 crypto: don't let data integrity writebacks fail with ENOMEM')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

This should be fixed in the quota layer so we can test with the quota
mutex held, but for now, we need this to avoid tests from crashing the
kernel aborting the regression test suite.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently if block allocation for DIO or DAX write fails due to ENOSPC,
we just returned it to userspace. However these ENOSPC errors can be
transient because the transaction freeing blocks has not yet committed.
This demonstrates as failures of generic/102 test when the filesystem is
mounted with 'dax' mount option.

Fix the problem by properly retrying the allocation in case of ENOSPC
error in get blocks functions used for direct IO.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>                                                                               

With the internal Quota feature, mke2fs creates empty quota inodes and
quota usage tracking is enabled as soon as the file system is mounted.
Since quotacheck is no longer preallocating all of the blocks in the
quota inode that are likely needed to be written to, we are now seeing
a lockdep false positive caused by needing to allocate a quota block
from inside ext4_map_blocks(), while holding i_data_sem for a data
inode.  This results in this complaint:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&ei->i_data_sem);
                                lock(&s->s_dquot.dqio_mutex);
                                lock(&ei->i_data_sem);
   lock(&s->s_dquot.dqio_mutex);

Google-Bug-Id: 27907753

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org